HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3021  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2013, 11:29 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,766
Glad to see they're restoring the base facade of the Tribune Building. Does anyone know what materials they'll be using?
I haven't been able to find a pic of what it looked like originally yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajiuO View Post
Tribune building lower face lift

While I was looking through some historic pics I ran across this. It's
always hard to believe that they demolished towers like these
behind the New York City Hall. New Yorkers would pay a premium to
live in one of these today if it were restored and converted.

http://www.thebillywilson.com/2012/12/the-population-of-every-city-in-canada.html

Above is Lower Manhattan's Newspaper Row before 1903 showing city hall in front (still standing), and from left
to right "New York World Building" built 1890 (demolished), "New York Tribune Building" built 1875 (demolished),
"American Tract Society Building" built 1894-95 (still standing), and the "New York Times Building" built 1889
(still standing) Source: Wikipedia


Last edited by delts145; Apr 2, 2013 at 11:46 PM.
     
     
  #3022  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 2:42 AM
Merewether's Avatar
Merewether Merewether is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: 8410*
Posts: 201
SLC demograhic atlas

A newish Salt Lake City atlas from the U Bureau of Economic and Business Research based on 2010 census demographic data

http://www.ucdp.utah.edu/?q=node/5
     
     
  #3023  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 3:29 AM
jmonkey's Avatar
jmonkey jmonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,034
Thanks for the photo update, ajiuO!! Some great photos! Thanks.

Great to see work on the Tribune Building, and it will be even better to see it occupied again! I think I have seen several street-level treatments of the building in photos over the years, so I'm sure it has been changed several times. Signage on this building also seemed to change greatly over the years. Jedikermit would know for certain, I bet.

It was also just in the news that the city would be moving the spruce tree in front of the building, as the roots were constricted from the surrounding concrete and asphalt. It will be moved to another location in the city. The tree was part of Christmas traditions in the city for many years, and very sentimental for many still.
     
     
  #3024  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 6:13 AM
ajiuO's Avatar
ajiuO ajiuO is offline
A.K.A. Vigo
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,998
I have been wounding what the deal with that tree was.. They dug out all around it.
     
     
  #3025  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 3:24 PM
jtrent77 jtrent77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
Does anybody know anything about this front page article on sltrib.com?

Kearns teacher pitching Muppets as LEGO figures
     
     
  #3026  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 3:25 PM
stayinginformed stayinginformed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 576
Not development related, but one of our own is in the news. Way to go Jedikermit.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56096018-78/com-cuusoo-idea-ideas.html.csp
     
     
  #3027  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 2:41 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Mayor View Post
You're right those would all be on other threads. While you may consider everything between Santaquin and N. Ogden to be Salt Lake City. That would be much to large of an area for one thread.
1) Utah Valley Thread
2-6) Salt Lake MSA Thread
7) Ogden Thread
#2, Brickyard, should be in Salt Lake City since it's actually in Salt Lake City.
     
     
  #3028  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 4:22 AM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Are you kidding me? This proposal has been online for over a year and only has 2300 supporters?

We need to share this with everyone. If you support it and log in via Facebook, it'll post it to your FB profile. We can probably get more supporters via FB.

FYI: JediKermit, how did you get this in the newspaper? Via Press release?



Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinginformed View Post
Not development related, but one of our own is in the news. Way to go Jedikermit.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56096018-78/com-cuusoo-idea-ideas.html.csp
     
     
  #3029  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 12:43 PM
Reachforthesky Reachforthesky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 207
Salt Lake City Annexation info

Found some interesting info concerning SLC annexing portions of Millcreek, It appears plans have been in place since 1979! Why's it taken so long to put into action?






http://www.slcinfobase.com/CouncilArchives/agendas/2002agendas/reports/5-7ITEMA3SYNOPSIS.pdf
     
     
  #3030  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 2:54 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
#2, Brickyard, should be in Salt Lake City since it's actually in Salt Lake City.
You're right. I always forget that goofy little section is actually in SLC.
     
     
  #3031  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 3:18 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reachforthesky View Post
Found some interesting info concerning SLC annexing portions of Millcreek, It appears plans have been in place since 1979! Why's it taken so long to put into action?


http://www.slcinfobase.com/CouncilArchives/agendas/2002agendas/reports/5-7ITEMA3SYNOPSIS.pdf
Obviously much of the plan can't be accomplished at this point, the part stating that all areas served by SLC water should be annexed into SLC. Holladay and Cottonwood Heights already incorporated and they are both served by SLC Water.

I do agree think it makes sense to at least shore up the boundaries a bit more. If you look at a map http://maps.slcgov.com/slcinternetmap/ the southern boundaries are all sorts of whacky. It looks like some property owners wanted to annex in, or the city had interest in certain areas, and they annexed those that were willing.

I think the city should at least shore up the southern boundary at 3300 S from 700 East up to 215, maybe a little bit of the area east of 215 right there as well.

Again the issue isn't simply SLC saying, "Hey we want all these parcels in our city" It takes an annexation movement by the property owners, or one initiated by the city. 51% of the total acreage has to be in favor of the annexation and 33% of the total value has to be in favor of the annexation, in order for it to pass.

A city initiated annexation would be very time consuming and costly, it would require staff to talk with each and every property owner. Staff would have to address a full range of concerns, from tax rates, to school boundaries and more.

The only way I see it happening is if a group of property owners decide they would like to be in SLC rather than Millcreek Township. These owners would need to initiate the process and be the ones to talk to all the property owners and address their concerns.

I believe there is also another route that can be taken, where the annexation would be put to a vote based on voting precincts. I am not familiar with this method however, but I know there was a vote a couple of years ago in the Willowcreek area, concerning annexation into Cottonwood Heights.
     
     
  #3032  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 3:25 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmonkey View Post
Thanks for the photo update, ajiuO!! Some great photos! Thanks.

Great to see work on the Tribune Building, and it will be even better to see it occupied again! I think I have seen several street-level treatments of the building in photos over the years, so I'm sure it has been changed several times. Signage on this building also seemed to change greatly over the years. Jedikermit would know for certain, I bet.

It was also just in the news that the city would be moving the spruce tree in front of the building, as the roots were constricted from the surrounding concrete and asphalt. It will be moved to another location in the city. The tree was part of Christmas traditions in the city for many years, and very sentimental for many still.
I'm glad to see the tree is being moved. I'm a bit of a tree hugger, and I always sensed the poor thing was struggling in that location. It was a nice tradition, but I hope it gets a much more hospitable location for it's type of root system.
     
     
  #3033  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 4:41 PM
sock puppet's Avatar
sock puppet sock puppet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SLC
Posts: 56
The Marmalade Block Makeover

http://chnc-slc.org/wordpress/?p=393

The on-again, off-again Marmalade Block development project located between 500 North and 600 North along the east side of 300 West is definitely on again, and this time looks much more likely to come to fruition.



After languishing for the past few years, we may finally see the property come to life this fall with a formal ground-breaking for the new Marmalade Library, which will serve as the anchor for the proposed development. (see artist’s rendering above, map of property below)



The four acre property, owned by The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, was originally to be developed by Howa Construction along with their development on the west side of 300 West and 600 North. But, while in the planning and early development stages for several years from roughly 2006 to 2009, the plans for the east side of the street finally fell apart due to the recession.

According to a 2010 article in the Salt Lake Tribune, “Howa [Construction] had an option to purchase the four acres on the east side from the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, but the recession intervened. Rick Howa said that after it became clear that his original plan — 82 condominiums and nine townhomes, priced from the low $300,000s to high $600,000s — wasn’t going to work, he still tried to make a deal with the RDA to do something of a retail nature, such as build a grocery store.

But he said he couldn’t come to an agreement with the agency, whose board is the Salt Lake City Council. As a result, Howa’s option expired in 2009 when “It all went down in a ball of flames,’ according to Rick Howa.”, as expressed in the article written by Lesley Mitchell. In the same article, RDA executive director D.J. Baxter, while calling Howa’s original proposal “fantastic,” said the developer’s alternative ideas didn’t do much for him or the board.”

But that was then and this is now: for the past three years as the recession has wound down, the RDA, starting from scratch, has been plugging away on a new plan for the property. The city agency has already written a “memorandum of understanding” with the Salt Lake City Public Library providing them with the land for a new neighborhood library, and hired MIG Planning, a city planning and consulting firm, with whose help they have held several meetings within the community for neighborhood input on the development.



Now that the first four community input workshops have been held at West High and Washington School, which the planners used to develop input from the community with regard to space planning wishes, parking, building materials, etc., the next step is to let out the “RFQs”, which are the formal “Request for Qualifications” to various interested developers who would essentially apply for consideration to be included based on their past work and their ability to handle their part of the project financially. With respect to the RFQs, the RDA says that they intend to break the block up into five parcels for the purpose of development, rather that letting it all go to one developer. The intention is to allow for a variety of design ideas to go up side by side, rather than build a hasty and monolithic looking project, with an eye to keeping the overall look and design of the project within the scale of the neighborhood. Further, the RDA intends to develop the park and plaza parcel itself, which, once complete, would come under the care of the city’s parks department.




Once the RFQs have been returned to the RDA with more specific proposals later this summer, the agency intends to hold additional meetings this coming fall to bring the neighborhood up to speed with the direction and timing of the project. The Bulletin staff will certainly post this and any other upcoming meetings regarding the project here on the blog in as timely a manner as possible. In fact, we will have another article coming in the next several days specifically about the new library and its design and current progress. As always, we value your comments and questions. More to come….

Thoughts?
     
     
  #3034  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 5:23 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,766
It sounds extremely encouraging Sock Puppet. Thanks for the excellent update.
     
     
  #3035  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 5:55 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
I think this plan is very appropriate for the Marmalade area. I like it a lot, especially the townhomes. I think the library and park space will serve as a good draw for potential residents, and the grocer is a wise move as well.
I suppose this will develop in phases. How many and in what order?
     
     
  #3036  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 6:25 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
I like the row of the 5 story buildings along 300 west.
     
     
  #3037  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 7:06 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,132
That's great news! I think the park and library will be a catalyst for more development to occur in the area. They should put a few pedestrian medians on 300 West to better connect to the other side of the road. Also, a Whole Foods, Trader Joes, or New Seasons grocery store would fit perfectly there, and would also be a major catalyst for more development in the area.

Last edited by Orlando; Apr 4, 2013 at 7:37 PM.
     
     
  #3038  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 7:16 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,639
I'm fine with Salt Lake City not annexing the hell out of its neighbors. I just don't see the need to artificially grow the population that way and there really isn't anything in Millcreek worth annexing (no offense to those who live there, but I mean, it's true...it's a great little community, but it doesn't even encompass the area where the Cottonwood Mall was located).

The only area I could see SLC annexing, which clearly isn't an option based on that list from '79, is South Salt Lake - which would make more sense and bring in certain areas the city could rehabilitate, specifically off State. But that isn't going to happen.

Interesting West Valley is on that list. Today, there is no way the city could annex WVC at its size - though, in '79, it was unincorporated, which explains why it's on the list.
     
     
  #3039  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 9:06 PM
UTPlanner's Avatar
UTPlanner UTPlanner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 941
I like the proposed layout for the Marmalade block. Keep in mind that the artist's rendition is only a rendition at this time so don't fall in love with any of the building designs shown. I also agree that something needs to be done to beautify 300 West in that area. I know that the RDA has looked into landscaping options but I'm not sure if they ever made a final decision.

Also just thought I'd let you know that they're now beginning contruction on Boyer's office tower at 101 S. 200 E. They have their permits in order and digging should start this week.

I'm wondering if anybody has seen the Eastside Apartments lately. They're applying the exterior materials. They're using metal panels which have been very popular with architects lately and I'm not exactly sure why. Looking specifically at the Eastside Apartments, I really can't decide if I like them.
     
     
  #3040  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 9:45 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,132
/\/\/\ Do you know if the design of the new Boyer office tower has changed from the 80's style design that we have seen previously?


Also, I'm not sure what metal panels you are referring to on the Eastside Apartments? Pics or renderings?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.