HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4881  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2013, 4:48 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,107
Ogden is wanting to with their Streetcar.

Provo I think has it in the long range plan. They are also working on BRT currently.

So both Ogden and Provo are working on their transit expansions plans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4882  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 11:23 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountyLemonade View Post
CNG buses are definitely making a comeback in the city. Twenty-four will enter service this year. Something like 101 CNG buses are to be ordered over a span of three years. UTA is really putting stock in the improved technology.

Mayor, do you remember on which route you saw the CNG bus running?

This is an article that appeared on Feb. 14. This was exactly around the week we were discussing CNG on this thread.
Apparantly, CNG technology wasn't handleing the high mountain altitudes effectively back in the 90's, so the State gave up on it. Now, the technology has advanced to the point that it has become enthusiastly embraced by both the U. of U. and Ut. State, and it would seem UTA is also getting on board.

Utah Considers Compressed Natural Gas Buses for State-wide Fleet

http://investments-and-acquisitions.com/...-natural-gas-buses-for-state-wide-fleet/

The natural gas surplus in Utah, and the high levels of air pollution, make the state a prime candidate for natural gas burning vehicles. The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) had the same idea back in the 1990s, when they put a fleet of natural gas buses in place to help cut back on emissions due to public transportation. Unfortunately, the environmentally responsible buses weren’t rugged enough to stand up to the high altitude and mountainous terrain. The UTA pulled the plug on the efforts in favor of pursuing clean diesel or hybrid alternatives.

Compressed natural gas (CNG) technology has advanced significantly since the 90’s, and several UTA board members are ready to give the locally produced fuel another try. They’ve secured two buses from Los Angeles and Phoenix to run and evaluate for performance. The test will continue for the next two weeks. If these new buses have enough pickup to maintain speed along Utah’s steep roads, the UTA will integrate similar buses into their fleet. The bus replacement would happen gradually over four years.

CNG buses would lower NOx emissions and also reduce the cost of public transportation for the residents of Utah. The standard $2 fares were increased to $2.25 at the start of August to help cover the cost of fuel. Diesel prices have skyrocketed recently, exceeding $3 per gallon. The natural gas sold in Utah sells for just $1.52 per gallon equivalent. Given the money that could be saved, UTA Chairman Greg Hughes remarks, “I just don’t see a downside.”

Before the CNG buses can be put into place, they have to pass the ongoing performance test. They are currently operating along two different routes – 3900 South and Highland Drive/1300 East. Members of the Utah Clean Cities Coalition are working in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to collect the necessary data. Geographical information collected by the bus systems in Utah is being uploaded to a DOE lab in Denver that specializes in alternative fuels. There, a team of researchers are duplicating the performance tests indoors where emissions can be closely monitored and sampled. The DOE will then generate a report, detailing exactly how clean these CNG buses are in practice.

Clean Energy officials applaud the UTA for its efforts not only with CNG vehicles, but also with the diesel-electric hybrid buses that they have already begun using. Utah is quickly becoming the role model for clean fleets of public transportation vehicles.


article on U. of U. and Ut. State CNG buses...

Thomas Built CNG Buses Ace it at Utah Universities

http://www.thomasbus.com/about-us/news/bus-report/2012_summer/cng-buses-at-universities.asp

.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4883  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 1:49 PM
UTAZLoVer's Avatar
UTAZLoVer UTAZLoVer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 445
I just have to question the age of this article, since UTA fares haven't been $2.00 since pre-2011, and fares actually increased from $2.25 to $2.35 last April.....perhaps its an older article that was more recently posted somewhere. On the up side of that, maybe their test run with CNG is done at this point and we can hope it went well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
This is an article that appeared on Feb. 14. This was exactly around the week we were discussing CNG on this thread.
Apparantly, CNG technology wasn't handleing the high mountain altitudes effectively back in the 90's, so the State gave up on it. Now, the technology has advanced to the point that it has become enthusiastly embraced by both the U. of U. and Ut. State, and it would seem UTA is also getting on board.

Utah Considers Compressed Natural Gas Buses for State-wide Fleet

http://investments-and-acquisitions.com/...-natural-gas-buses-for-state-wide-fleet/

The natural gas surplus in Utah, and the high levels of air pollution, make the state a prime candidate for natural gas burning vehicles. The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) had the same idea back in the 1990s, when they put a fleet of natural gas buses in place to help cut back on emissions due to public transportation. Unfortunately, the environmentally responsible buses weren’t rugged enough to stand up to the high altitude and mountainous terrain. The UTA pulled the plug on the efforts in favor of pursuing clean diesel or hybrid alternatives.

Compressed natural gas (CNG) technology has advanced significantly since the 90’s, and several UTA board members are ready to give the locally produced fuel another try. They’ve secured two buses from Los Angeles and Phoenix to run and evaluate for performance. The test will continue for the next two weeks. If these new buses have enough pickup to maintain speed along Utah’s steep roads, the UTA will integrate similar buses into their fleet. The bus replacement would happen gradually over four years.

CNG buses would lower NOx emissions and also reduce the cost of public transportation for the residents of Utah. The standard $2 fares were increased to $2.25 at the start of August to help cover the cost of fuel. Diesel prices have skyrocketed recently, exceeding $3 per gallon. The natural gas sold in Utah sells for just $1.52 per gallon equivalent. Given the money that could be saved, UTA Chairman Greg Hughes remarks, “I just don’t see a downside.”

Before the CNG buses can be put into place, they have to pass the ongoing performance test. They are currently operating along two different routes – 3900 South and Highland Drive/1300 East. Members of the Utah Clean Cities Coalition are working in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to collect the necessary data. Geographical information collected by the bus systems in Utah is being uploaded to a DOE lab in Denver that specializes in alternative fuels. There, a team of researchers are duplicating the performance tests indoors where emissions can be closely monitored and sampled. The DOE will then generate a report, detailing exactly how clean these CNG buses are in practice.

Clean Energy officials applaud the UTA for its efforts not only with CNG vehicles, but also with the diesel-electric hybrid buses that they have already begun using. Utah is quickly becoming the role model for clean fleets of public transportation vehicles.


article on U. of U. and Ut. State CNG buses...

Thomas Built CNG Buses Ace it at Utah Universities

http://www.thomasbus.com/about-us/news/bus-report/2012_summer/cng-buses-at-universities.asp

.
__________________
If people were all meant to pop out of bed, we'd all sleep in toasters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4884  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 9:38 PM
Zmapper Zmapper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 210
Are the CNG buses that UTA is testing from NABI or another vendor?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4885  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2013, 4:09 AM
CountyLemonade's Avatar
CountyLemonade CountyLemonade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 394
UTA tested CNG buses from Phoenix and Los Angeles about three years ago. So, yes, that article is quite old.

And yeah, their test had to have gone well. CNG buses are entering service soon.

Last edited by CountyLemonade; Mar 13, 2013 at 3:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4886  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2013, 3:01 AM
stayinginformed stayinginformed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 576
Only a few more weeks until TRAX opening. Here is the opening commercial.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4887  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2013, 12:10 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,700
A little blurb coinciding with some of our posts regarding CNG and cleaning up our transportation. While it's good news, it's also a meager amount of contribution, considering the vast billions that has been bungled on new tech. projects. Anyway, glad to see that CNG is proving to be an excellent bridge option.

Department of Environmental Quality awards grants for natural gas use

Deseret News

SALT LAKE CITY — Natural gas usage will expand in Utah thanks to grants from the Department of Environmental Quality's Division of Air Quality.

The division has awarded $250,000 in grants from the Clean Fuels Grant and Loan Program to help three entities — Salt Lake City Corp., Utah Transit Authority and University of Utah — purchase natural gas equipment or expand natural gas refueling stations along the Wasatch Front.


Salt Lake City will use the grant to purchase four CNG vehicles for its fleet.

“The conversion of the city's fleet to CNG is proving to be very successful and well-received by the community," said Renee Zollinger, Salt Lake City's environmental manager. "The purchase of these vehicles will expand the breadth and diversity of alternative fuel vehicles used to deliver city services and help demonstrate that the technology is beneficial in a wide variety of applications.”

.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4888  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 10:27 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
So UTA's final decision is to not run the airport line any earlier or later to meet the demands of those early and late flights. I understand their reasoning, but this is one reason that I'm glad UTA will soon be cutting back on construction and planning of new lines to focus more on the system already in place. I think once they do that, they'll find ways to make the system more efficient and better serve needs like this one, especially those weekend flights.

The system we currently have in place is wonderful, and extraordinary considering the size of our metro, but it really is not as good as it could be yet. The focus should soon move from expansion to improvement from within, and also spreading information and understand through the public to improve safety and usage.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/56062948-90/trax-airport-service-uta.html.csp
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4889  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 10:36 PM
StevenF's Avatar
StevenF StevenF is offline
The Drifter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,172
I agree on not doing anymore expansions except in 1 area and that is to add a line down 400 South connecting Central Station to the U.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4890  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 10:55 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,107
I do agree that getting the downtown loop done should happen. Other than that, I don't see any need to expand Trax for another 5 to 10 years. That would ridership to expand and show the need for more TODs along the lines.

I do think it might be a good idea to get another 0.25% sales tax increase in the UTA zone to increase service frequency, morning and evening hours for all transit forms. I think this would go a long way to further reducing car miles traveled as well as increasing transit usage.

The major complaint of UTA is that the frequency and hours are just not there. Increasing these areas I think will cause more people to use the transit options we have as well as may show a need to expand service in some areas.

I do think that Salt Lake should still pursue street cars though. This will help people once they are downtown as well as to help spur development downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4891  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 11:11 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
I can think of two. 1. Downtown Loop for sure, 2. Maybe having Trax line go from draper to Lehi where Adobe is. Then have a break for awhile.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4892  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 1:58 AM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
I agree with the downtown loop, but I think the number one priority now should be focusing on increasing efficiency, ridership, and operating hours.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4893  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 3:29 AM
DMTower's Avatar
DMTower DMTower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 811
^^^ The downtown loop is needed to increase efficiency.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4894  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 12:13 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,107
With a downtown loop, UTA could run a modified version of the airport line early morning and late into the evening, provide direct Hub to U transit without overloading the existing line as well as having a downtown circular train that just goes in a loop around downtown.

It is possible that the airport and the downtown loop could be made into 24 hour trains eventually too before other lines would need to have 24 hour service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4895  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 7:12 PM
SLCMoosy SLCMoosy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 41
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/56068658-90/information-maps-google-uta.html.csp

Google chose UTA as their first transit system to provide live updates via Google Maps - awesome!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4896  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 7:38 PM
vxla vxla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
I was in SLC last weekend; here's a video of the TRAX test train on North Temple (just west of the viaduct) from Monday

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4897  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 7:43 PM
vxla vxla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4
I was in SLC last weekend; here's a video of the TRAX test train on North Temple (just west of the viaduct) from Monday

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4898  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 8:22 PM
Twothirty8 Twothirty8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 59
thanks for sharing VXLA, I'm super excited to ride the new airport trax line.

I definitely think they need to keep creating TRAX lines, especially throughout downtown, the more lines we have, the more cars will be taken off the road, the more it will help our air quality. Plus who doesn't love rail? And, at the rate SLC is growing we need to continue to make new lines just to keep up. New lines just don't pop up overnight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4899  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 8:38 PM
StevenF's Avatar
StevenF StevenF is offline
The Drifter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,172
Until some things are ironed out so scheduling and how often and how late they run are fixed I wouldn't want anymore lines added. Though the exception would be the downtown circular. Just building lines wouldn't be a good idea as you will find that some lines would be empty and no profitability on those. I also think for the Salt Lake Valley we have a pretty good rail set up that covers a high percentage of the Valley. Most people don't need to go more than 10-15 minutes to get to a station.

Where UTA could get a head start is getting right of ways selected and land purchased so it wont get developed. Have areas ready to build on when the need is there for it.

Now bus frequency would be a nice change to a 15-30 min schedule instead of 30-60 minute schedules UTA runs now. If the Schedules were like that I would take the bus more often. The 232 runs close to my home and during peak hours is only a 30 min bus and the rest of the time its an hour. I would love to see that go on more of a 15 min then I could take it to the West Valley TRAX station and use the train more often than I do. But it comes down to the fact I would rather drive my car the 10 min to the station than work my schedule around a 30-60 min bus route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4900  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2013, 12:24 AM
John Martin's Avatar
John Martin John Martin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,195
I'll definitely be driving to work the first few days the extension opens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:02 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.