HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4521  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2013, 7:55 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
I admit I like the Austin cars, but I also like the Philly ones RTD will be using. They are no-nonsense. They say "I am a real train, not somebody's cute toy transit." They are the exact opposite of these, which I hate with a vengeance:


image by chanaher on flickr
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4522  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2013, 3:21 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,317
Yeah, I really like RTD's EMUs. Like Cirrus said, unapologetic, in-your-face, people mover.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4523  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2013, 10:00 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
http://project.wnyc.org/commute-times-us/embed.html?layer=0#12.00/39.7320/-104.9826
^ Check out this commuting map. It's interactive and shows the average commute time per zip code.

Quote:
Mega-Commuters Take Manhattan

Do you travel at least 90 minutes and 50 miles to get to work? The U.S. Census Bureau calls you a "mega-commuter" — and you're not alone.

About 2 percent of workers in the New York Metro Area are mega-commuters, according to American Community Survey figures released Tuesday.

The routes into Manhattan have some of the highest number of mega-commuters in the country. The flow into the city from Suffolk County, New York, and Fairfield County, Connecticut, are near the top of that list, behind two counties outside of Los Angeles.

Also in the top-ten for number of mega-commuters: Those who commute to New York from Pennsylvania's Monroe County — a 91-mile trip that takes about 2 hours each way.
http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2013/mar/05/mega-commuters-take-manhattan/
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4524  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2013, 1:15 AM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
New York has had 90 to 240 minute commutes for years.

http://mta.info/mnr/html/mnrmap.htm

(Metro-North Railroad)

http://mta.info/lirr/Timetable/lirrmap.htm

(LIRR)

And the speeds have not increased since the 1920s or so, but a huge number of people STILL use these commuter lines.

What else was the bar car for?
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4525  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2013, 1:17 AM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
I admit I like the Austin cars, but I also like the Philly ones RTD will be using. They are no-nonsense. They say "I am a real train, not somebody's cute toy transit." They are the exact opposite of these, which I hate with a vengeance:

[snip]
image by chanaher on flickr
Reminds me of wine retailers selling wine in a plastic bladder enclosed in cardboard...
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf

Last edited by Cirrus; Mar 14, 2013 at 7:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4526  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2013, 8:06 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Here's part 2 of the frequent bus network series on DenverUrbanism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by me on DenverUrbanism.com
Advertise special buses with a special brand

RTD has a great network of frequent bus routes that are much more convenient than the average bus line. Unfortunately, most people can’t tell the frequent routes from the regular ones. A map highlighting the best lines can help, but combining the map with a special brand for the routes shown on it would be even better.

Something like this, perhaps:



read more
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4527  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 7:20 PM
Beastie Bern Beastie Bern is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
A few questions from an observer

Hi all!

I love this forum and the thoughtful analysis that goes into many of the threads!
I'm a Denverite living in Grand Junction and i'm hoping to make a move back to my hometown.

I was wondering if anyone could offer some opinion and thoughts about light rail and the Fastracks project.

What do you like about Fastracks?
What are some of the liabilities of the project?
Where can improvements be made on RTD's part?
How do you feel RTD's public outreach and public information "dissemination" is?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4528  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 7:49 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Oh dear. Can of worms. OK.

>>What do you like about Fastracks?
Besides the obvious fact that it's a massive regional transit expansion, I assume? I like that they have figured out that EMU/DMU is better than light rail for the sort of long distance commute-based trips that FasTracks is mostly built around. I love light rail, but EMU/DMU is more suited to what Denver uses most of these lines for, so I am proud of RTD for not pre-supposing 1 single mode. I like that they put together a practical package that the voters in a politically balcanized region could support. And I like the architecture; they've done a great job with attractive stations & bridges.

>>What are some of the liabilities of the project?
Do you mean liabilities in terms of "future responsibilities" or in terms of "problems"? If the former, RTD will have a much larger operating bill every year once the trains start running, and in 30 or 40 years they're going to have a lot of maintenance work that will have to be done in order to keep the system running smoothly.

If the latter, there are 3 big problems with FasTracks:
1) It doesn't provide enough service to the most transit-ready and transit-supportive (but transit-lacking) places in the inner city, most notably Colfax, Broadway, Highlands, and Cherry Creek.
2) It terminates almost all transit trips at Union Station, which is not where most of the riders want to go. Shuttles can be provided, but even so that inconveniences riders, which lowers ridership.
3) The planning for the Boulder line was not done correctly. BRT was more practical but rail was what people wanted, so instead of biting the bullet and doing one of them correctly, RTD "compromised" by doing both, but neither of them well. As a result Boulder will get 2 transit lines, but neither will be very good.

Note that all of these are good problems to have, compared to no FasTracks at all.

>>Where can improvements be made on RTD's part?
The 3 problems listed directly above will have to be fixed eventually. In the short term they could manage the bus system better, so that people use it more. In the long term they'll need to find a way to extend the rail system from Union Station east through downtown. Eventually they'll have to decide which mode to do correctly in Boulder.

How do you feel RTD's public outreach and public information "dissemination" is?
Can't answer this. Not in Colorado, so I don't see it.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4529  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2013, 8:07 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,317
System is not where the people are. Consequently, we are forced to plan for and implement TOD in places (most) we shouldn't be.

RTD is so consumed by FasTracks they are ignoring their bread-and-butter, bus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4530  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2013, 1:14 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
RyanD posted this in the development thread. Looks like Denver is getting a bike station.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanD View Post
New triangle building rendering.. I like it a lot! And this is the first time we see the bike facility. Sweet!!

__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4531  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 1:47 PM
Brainpathology's Avatar
Brainpathology Brainpathology is offline
of Gnomeregan
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLANSIT View Post
System is not where the people are. Consequently, we are forced to plan for and implement TOD in places (most) we shouldn't be.

RTD is so consumed by FasTracks they are ignoring their bread-and-butter, bus.
It could be a lot worse. I love criticizing RTD, but that's because from where RTD is I can imagine something better. Where I am now I can't really even see a functioning transit system from the reality of what it is now. Getting to the parks from downtown on bus is a 3 hour proposition at the very least. There is no connection from the airport to the parks or downtown and no plans to ever have them save for a hodgepodge of different entities building thrown together rail systems that even if built will require at least 1 transfer (on different systems) to get from the airport to downtown or the parks. The one rail system they are building now is akin to building a person with a spine only. It goes to a couple sorta important places but it doesn't really link any two large destinations in the city at all. (I have to add that this is my impression of pretty much every other city I've ever visited that isn't in the northeast or named San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago or Los Angeles.

RTD should be embarrassed, ashamed, held accountable and should, more than 10 years ago, have fixed not having a 20th century method for people to pay fares. I can only assume that this will be fixed by the time coastal elites who already mock Denver visit and try to take the train without cash or meticulous planning before they arrive. It would really 🞵🞵🞵🞵 for their derision and smug haughtiness to actually be appropriate for once. Same for RTD's treatment, fear, and accommodation to the People's Republic; it's a joke.

But again, viable, great and not perfect is still viable and great which is a lot more than any other city of Denver's size (and a great many larger cities)
can boast.
__________________
Alamosa - La Veta - Walsenburg - Rye - Pueblo - Boulder - Colorado Springs - Denver - Los Angeles - Orlando - Tacoma, Old Town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4532  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 4:21 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
^
I took a city bus from the airport to downtown Orlando a couple of years ago. It wasn't super convenient, but it wasn't terrible. I didn't have to transfer. And don't the parks themselves provide a TON of buses from the airport? Certainly looked that way from the airport bus terminal. Not saying Orlando doesn't have terrible transit (it's terrible), or that Denver isn't way better (it's way better), just that my experience wasn't quite what you describe.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4533  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 4:22 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
New b-cycle stations announced:


image from @Denver_Bcycle on twitter
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4534  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 4:52 PM
Brainpathology's Avatar
Brainpathology Brainpathology is offline
of Gnomeregan
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
^
I took a city bus from the airport to downtown Orlando a couple of years ago. It wasn't super convenient, but it wasn't terrible. I didn't have to transfer. And don't the parks themselves provide a TON of buses from the airport? Certainly looked that way from the airport bus terminal. Not saying Orlando doesn't have terrible transit (it's terrible), or that Denver isn't way better (it's way better), just that my experience wasn't quite what you describe.
I haven't done the airport to downtown bus trip yet. And certainly if you pay Disney for a vacation or a hotel room there will be a big bus waiting for you and a bunch of other vacationers when you land. If you live here and work at Disney, and aren't housed by Disney with dedicated similar transportation, you're destined to waste huge blocks of time getting to and from work or getting a car. And if you're not going to Disney trying to get around you're in real trouble as well without a car or living extremely close to work. And even then there are maybe 2 or 3 neighborhoods here where the development model doesn't all but obviate the possibility of walking even if you DO live near work.

BUT your point about visiting Orlando and getting to Disney is definitely true.. that's probably one reason nothing is being done... the city certainly doesn't suffer from a lack of visitors dumping their money here. And Disney has 0% interest in investing in anything outside of their property boundaries (and nor should they - if it is to happen it has to be legislated more). Quite the contrary actually, the worse International Drive, downtown and the surrounding areas become the more likely it is that anyone visiting town will stay at Disney where the development, transit, sight lines from the roads, chipper friendly cast members etc is absolutely, completely and in all other ways controlled.
__________________
Alamosa - La Veta - Walsenburg - Rye - Pueblo - Boulder - Colorado Springs - Denver - Los Angeles - Orlando - Tacoma, Old Town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4535  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 6:16 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,317
Re: 15th St. Protected Bike lane.

The City has committed to using full vertical separation (bollards). The first phase (striping, green paint, bike box, lead interval, signage, non-vertical buffer) will go in this year. The separation portion (bollards, etc.) will go in Spring 2014 (there needs to be a some work done for design).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4536  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 6:25 PM
awholeparade awholeparade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 362
Finally, a Bcycle station in South Broadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4537  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 9:06 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
In other big bikesharing news, your b-cycle membership will soon work in any city in the US with a b-cycle system.

__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4538  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 9:40 PM
Brainpathology's Avatar
Brainpathology Brainpathology is offline
of Gnomeregan
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 1,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
In other big bikesharing news, your b-cycle membership will soon work in any city in the US with a b-cycle system.

[snip]
Is SLC's different somehow? Or was the ad from SLC?
__________________
Alamosa - La Veta - Walsenburg - Rye - Pueblo - Boulder - Colorado Springs - Denver - Los Angeles - Orlando - Tacoma, Old Town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4539  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 9:47 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
It hasn't opened yet, and it's not using the b-cycle name (it will simply be called "GreenBike"). Could be either of those, but I'm guessing it's the latter since they colored it green.

The ad is from Fort Lauderdale, FL.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4540  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 10:56 PM
DenverInfill's Avatar
DenverInfill DenverInfill is offline
mmmm... infillicious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lower Highland, Denver
Posts: 3,357
I see Hawaii is now located off the coast of Florida. Convenient!
__________________
~ Ken

DenverInfill Blog
DenverUrbanism
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:23 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.