Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds
No! Don't fall to this mentality! Sometimes it's not better than nothin' because at least with nothin', you have the hope of gettin' somethin'. Know what I'm sayin'?
|
I respectfully disagree. By that line of thinking, Salt Lake would still be a barren and empty desert. Nothing would get built.
Though not praise-worthy, the Liberty Gateway fits the natural progression of Salt Lake's growth. It will add several hundred people to an empty spot-- people who are likely to rely mostly on the transit system, to patron downtown's shops, eateries and events. So it's much better than nothing.
It seems pretty naive to me to expect an architectural gem with every proposal, or skyscrapers or whatever. Sometimes we get lucky, mostly with civic buildings, but the demand just isn't high enough to make developers compete, or to require ingenuity and innovation of designers and architects.
I'm not even sure it would be good to skip the natural progression and just have everyone go balls out, because then you end up with monstrosities like Dubai. We even got that kind of thing to a small degree with City Creek, and look at how hard a time they're having selling those. I want some signature stuff just as much as anyone here, but it's projects like this that are required to get to that point. Ever increasing density is the bottom line.