HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5221  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2013, 10:57 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Somone living in OV would probably get to Waterfront just as quick on the streetcar if not quicker instead of switching at Main St or riding the otherway and switching at OV station. But in either case the streetcar would be popular in shuttling passengers.
Nope. Downtown is way too saturated with buses. Any rapid transit (Skytrain) is 3 x faster than trolley bus, which is the equivalent of Toronto streetcar.
     
     
  #5222  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2013, 5:43 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Nope. Downtown is way too saturated with buses. Any rapid transit (Skytrain) is 3 x faster than trolley bus, which is the equivalent of Toronto streetcar.
I till think a streetcar from Main street station to Granville Island would be a huge benefit to the city. It would primarily run on a rail bed that already exists (and was re-built) and would nicely connect Granville Island and Olympic Village to the Expo Line and Canada Line.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #5223  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2013, 10:33 PM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
Yeah, I see the streetcar plan as essentially two separate routes (Arbutus/Granville Is. to Main St, and Gastown to Stanley Park) connected together out of operational necessity. Both those routes alone would do well - I think the ridership on the Olympic Line in 2010 established that quite well. Over two months it averaged something ridiculous like 25,000 rides a day on such a tiny stretch... if the full stretch from Main to Arbutus could net even half that in regular service it'd be a great success, and I think that's very feasible.
     
     
  #5224  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2013, 8:34 PM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Why the heck would anyone living on the south side of False Creek want to take a streetcar downtown when they're just a few minute's walk from a Skytrain station? If we ran the streetcar all the way to Granville Island, does anyone seriously think that downtown-bound passengers who board there would stay on the streetcar and not transfer at the Olympic Village station?
Lets break that down into two options (if both exist).

1) You leave the Olympic Village and walk to the nearest Skytrain Station and are heading to Waterfront, your trip will take a minimum of 15 minutes (depending on where you leave from and what station you walk to). It will be longer if have to wait a few minutes at the station. You are pretty close to downtown, but it takes less time to go from Granville and 16th to Waterfront on the #10.

2) You walk out your door and take a very short walk to the OV tram station, get on a tram and are at waterfront in less time. Change your destination to Gastown (probably the fastest growing office area in Vancouver) and the advantage is even greater.

And you are forgetting the multitude of other trips the streetcar serves effectively. What about people coming from the Expo Line to Granville Island? What about people going from Canada Line to Chinatown? If the extension is built to Yaletown, it would connect Canada line to BC Place. And I don't think I have to explain the benefit of it going out to Stanley Park instead of the crowded 19.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
With more and more development along the south shore of False Creek I can see the need for some sort of shuttle service along it. I'm not convinced that a streetcar is the most cost-effective means to provide the service, but at least it would be fairly cheap to implement since almost all of the right-of-way already exists.

But I see absolutely no need for a streetcar to run downtown since it already has two Skytrain lines and by far the most frequent and numerous bus and trolley routes anywhere in the lower mainland.
Skytrain is a regional system, providing a huge time savings when travelling between 2 distant points. The closer the points get together, the less savings Skytrain offers over surface travel.

The streetcar isn't for getting people into downtown, it's for connecting the dots between Skytrain stations and areas that are under served.

Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Nope. Downtown is way too saturated with buses. Any rapid transit (Skytrain) is 3 x faster than trolley bus, which is the equivalent of Toronto streetcar.
The difference here is that the Streetcar would take routes not used by the trolley bus. There are no trolley wires on Water, Cordova, or Columbia and no service at all on W 1st. The 19 goes out to Stanley Park, and it is busy during the summer (standing room only on weekends after Burrard).

The trolley buses are also very busy with long distance travel. People get on downtown and are riding those buses into deep Vancouver. And they all travel on the same route through downtown and bunch up. Every trolley is as fast as the slowest trolley. By having the streetcar take streets with no trolleys on them, it is not held up by their traffic, and thus, can offer huge time savings for people trying to get around the East Side (which is more in demand now than since the 60's). You also segregate travellers. Instead of having the suburban buses slowed down by people getting on and off, they can enjoy more manageable passenger volumes, and downtown travelers don't have to be crammed onto buses with commuters heading home.

To bring it back on topic: Now here is where the test comes in. To see how much it affects travel. I think the streetcar will have a huge impact on the area it serves. I think trips to Granville Island on transit are too low, too many people drive there. During the Olympics, everyone took the tram. Connecting into or out of Gastown is quite difficult, and it is a long walk to get to the OV. That said, I don't think it will compare to Skytrain. There will be time savings off a local bus, but not as much as Skytrain offers. There will be increased capacity, but not as much as Skytrain. It will attract new riders, but not as much as Skytrain ( and Canada Line) has in the past.

Building out the Streetcar as a test is a much cheaper alternative than building out LRT somewhere else. And after its done, it will still be useful instead of us wishing we had build Skytrain to Granville Island.
     
     
  #5225  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 5:51 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
You walk out your door and take a very short walk to the OV tram station, get on a tram and are at waterfront in less time.

Skytrain is a regional system, providing a huge time savings when traveling between 2 distant points. The closer the points get together, the less savings Skytrain offers over surface travel.
Both these points ignore the fact that Skytrain will always provide a much more frequent service than a streetcar. Transit users value frequency highly, even more so for shorter trips, and they're willing to walk farther to access it.

Quote:
The streetcar isn't for getting people into downtown, it's for connecting the dots between Skytrain stations and areas that are under served.
Well downtown certainly isn't under served. And if Stanley Park isn't served adequately right now that could easily rectified by providing more trolleys or buses between downtown and the park during the tourist season. Considering that it's not a major commuter destination or has particularly heavy volumes I really don't see any point whatsoever in spending money on a unique transit infrastructure for it.

As I said before, I can see the need for a south False Creek connector, but extending it to downtime or to Stanley Park just seems like folly to me.
     
     
  #5226  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 8:18 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Both these points ignore the fact that Skytrain will always provide a much more frequent service than a streetcar. Transit users value frequency highly, even more so for shorter trips, and they're willing to walk farther to access it.

Well downtown certainly isn't under served. And if Stanley Park isn't served adequately right now that could easily rectified by providing more trolleys or buses between downtown and the park during the tourist season. Considering that it's not a major commuter destination or has particularly heavy volumes I really don't see any point whatsoever in spending money on a unique transit infrastructure for it.

As I said before, I can see the need for a south False Creek connector, but extending it to downtime or to Stanley Park just seems like folly to me.
I think you people are missing the long term view of the street car. You need think of downtown as the area which entirely surrounds False Creek. As the Olympic Village, Mount Pleasant, Chinatown, South Granville and Citygate continue to densify they're just going to be another big continuous blob of downtown.

People will need to be able to connect radially along this circular blob as well as to and from the core. To get from the Downtown East Side to the Broadway Core as is can be a pain in the ass. The street car would atleast connect you to rapid transit without having to double back to get to an extended M-Line.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #5227  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 8:25 AM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
I think you people are missing the long term view of the street car. You need think of downtown as the area which entirely surrounds False Creek. As the Olympic Village, Mount Pleasant, Chinatown, South Granville and Citygate continue to densify they're just going to be another big continuous blob of downtown.

People will need to be able to connect radially along this circular blob as well as to and from the core. To get from the Downtown East Side to the Broadway Core as is can be a pain in the ass. The street car would atleast connect you to rapid transit without having to double back to get to an extended M-Line.
These places are already connected by rail service! It takes what, 6 minutes to get from OV to Chinatown by taking SkyTrain via Waterfront. Getting from DTES to the Broadway core is almost the same 6-minute trip in reverse. The street car will be redundant, period.
     
     
  #5228  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 9:04 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zassk View Post
These places are already connected by rail service! It takes what, 6 minutes to get from OV to Chinatown by taking SkyTrain via Waterfront. Getting from DTES to the Broadway core is almost the same 6-minute trip in reverse. The street car will be redundant, period.
Stadium Skytrain Stn isn't very central in the DTES, and neither is Waterfront. In fact, both are its at the very edge. Somewhere near the Viaduct Dip would have been a great location for a station if the Expo Line was built for local residential traffic. A location along the railway tracks near Main St. would also be a great option for an Expo extension.

The DTES neighbourhood centers on Main and Hastings. It always has, and likely will despite the mess it's currently it. Its about a 10 to 15 minute walk from any skytrain station.

I usually go from Stadium to Granville, then transfer to the Canada line. It's about 35 minutes to Cambie and Broadway. A street car would probably be 15-25 minutes. Including waiting for the train at a reasonable frequency and walking to Broadway or transferring.

The alternative is the 3 and 99 or 3 and 9. Neither are fast. I'm a 10 minute walk from Main and Hastings, and for my partner to get to work at VGH via transit is about 45 minutes. That's using the 22 and 99.

The walk is also about 45 minutes. Biking is always about 10 minutes. Driving can be as little as 5 minutes (or as much as 45). So, she walks every day it's not miserable out. Most people aren't willing to walk as far or as quickly as my partner and I are. We manage about 7 km/h rather steadily.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #5229  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 4:27 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Extending Skytrain from Waterfront down Hastings would put a station or two square in the middle of Chinatown and DTES, but even then, it would be for regional service. The whole point of the streetcar is to provide local service. It isn't all about moving people from DTES to Broadway, it's about moving people from DTES to Broadway, and everything in between. Skytrain by design can't and wont ever do this.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
     
     
  #5230  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 6:28 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
We're getting a bit off topic
     
     
  #5231  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2013, 4:08 AM
Alon Alon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 219
The main in-between nodes are still served by the Canada Line and such.
     
     
  #5232  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2013, 12:40 AM
Joat's Avatar
Joat Joat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 226
How many study phases are usually done for a project like this? I notice both the surrey and UBC line studies are in their second phases and the results of the two studies are supposed to be released early this year. With the provincial election coming up and these studies concluding I wonder if we will have any better of an idea of which line will be chosen.
     
     
  #5233  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2013, 1:34 AM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
No guarantee that either line would be chosen. Broadway has had study after study after study done, for all we know the current one will just produce another shiny new report to stick on the shelf with the others and forget about for 5 years until the next study gets commissioned... In any case supposedly there's still a third phase for each of these studies before any final reports...
     
     
  #5234  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2013, 1:44 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,096
This round of study is to choose the preferred alternatives (note: plural) to be the candidate for phase 3 and further study, which will not begin until there is funding. After that, the preferred alternative (note: singular) will be chosen. If the provincial government doesn't agree, then they'll send TransLink back to do further studies until they come up with the result they like
     
     
  #5235  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2013, 10:14 PM
TransitJack TransitJack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 443
     
     
  #5236  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2013, 4:10 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Well!

The report was very interesting to read, and quite clearly states a dozen times that skytrain to UBC is essential.
     
     
  #5237  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2013, 4:12 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,000
Yeah a good read indeed. Would love for the UBC skytrain extension to be somewhat fast tracked (such as beginning as soon as the Evergreen Line is done).

With the Evergreen Line and a UBC extension, arguable Metro Vancouver would have the continent's best rapid transit system relative to its population size.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #5238  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2013, 4:42 AM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Yeah a good read indeed. Would love for the UBC skytrain extension to be somewhat fast tracked (such as beginning as soon as the Evergreen Line is done).

With the Evergreen Line and a UBC extension, arguable Metro Vancouver would have the continent's best rapid transit system relative to its population size.
Not against UBC extension at all, but for the right price (I am guessing $500/per hour) KPMG would write you a report that states anything you want... And if you want that too include stating the obvious they would do that too....
     
     
  #5239  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2013, 5:36 AM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Anyone with half a brain knows SkyTrain down Broadway to UBC is required. Don't need a KPMG study to tell us that.
     
     
  #5240  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2013, 7:28 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
I just wonder what Surrey's reaction will be to this. It's a nice case for sure, but in the context of regional politics... I don't think it'll totally win over the other cities that feel underserved...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:34 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.