HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #641  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2012, 8:27 PM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
But the feds won't fund construction if the locals have refused to fund operations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #642  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2012, 8:36 PM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by zilfondel View Post
Now, although I think the project as it is designed is a large waste of money, I still believe that a local bridge + MAX in Clark County would help congestion.
I don't dispute that at all. But when a congestion point gets relieved, unless that relief comes from having fewer cars instead of enabling more of them, it creates new congestion points and exacerbate others. And that's what this boondoggle monster project would do.

It's like a bathtub. Let's say some genius comes along and decides it takes too long for the water to drain after a bath, so he creates a tub with a super-wide drain. WHOOOSH, right? Not so much, unless all of the pipes can handle that much water at once. But they can't.

Portland's highway system isn't particularly well designed. Instead of routing traffic around the city, it dumps a lot straight into the heart of it. The last thing we want to do is make that worse.

I'm not saying we shouldn't relieve congestion points. But this one isn't worth 4.2 billion dollars, and it certainly isn't worth the six billion or more it'll eventually cost when all of the competing interests finish duking it out, especially since the new congestion messes it'll add to will cost even more to fix.

If Vancouver wants light rail, the answer is to build a pedestrian/bike/light rail bridge. And if Vancouver doesn't want light rail, it's about time we stop trying to take it there and pour our resources into Portland neighborhoods like SE! NE! NOPO! I realize that's an entirely different can of worms... but, man... 4.2 billion for a project Vancouver voters just shot down a key component of. Make the madness stop.

With all of the talk of Portland-Creep, I think it's about time Portland starts pouring its resources back into Portland. Voters in Vancouver don't want light rail? No worries. We'll take it into SE instead via the Streetcar, which is something we should have been focusing on anyway (the new inner-inner-inner-inner SE line doesn't count since it goes nowhere near where most people in SE live). Decades from now, when Vancouver realizes how amazing our system is and finally wants to be part of it, they can pay their fair share to make that happen. And I'll support the project 100%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #643  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2012, 8:37 PM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,523
This is all probably a moot point since our next mayor doesn't seem to want to focus on anything grander than filling potholes. Shrug.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #644  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2012, 6:21 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65MAX View Post
Wasn't the Clark Co tax supposed to fund operations? It had nothing to do with capital costs for the bridge. The light rail construction funding wasn't killed by that vote.
I've heard the feds won't fund a light rail project that has no operations funding sources.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #645  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2012, 7:17 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
I've heard the feds won't fund a light rail project that has no operations funding sources.
They won't. However C-TRAN has said they can come up with the committed funds needed by cutting some bus service, planned fleet upgrades, and even perhaps a smaller taxing district that only requires the approval of citizens of Vancouver, and not the entire service district.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #646  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2012, 7:46 AM
davehogan davehogan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
They won't. However C-TRAN has said they can come up with the committed funds needed by cutting some bus service, planned fleet upgrades, and even perhaps a smaller taxing district that only requires the approval of citizens of Vancouver, and not the entire service district.
From what I've heard, that's the next step, and the project sounds like Vancouver supports it. Clark County doesn't, but if Vancouver does that's a good start.

I just moved to NE, so I'd love better access to Vancouver. I don't feel like going to downtown Portland just to get up to Vancouver, but that's the most direct option from where I live.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #647  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 12:49 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Quote:
Washington initiative king Tim Eyman, 'birther' attorney team up to stop Vancouver light rail
Quote:
Debbie Peterson, who lost the 49th District Senate race to Democrat Sharon Wylie in November, has recruited Eyman to help pressure the Vancouver City Council to put the so-called "Stop Light Rail" initiative on the ballot.
Quote:
"We're really excited," Peterson wrote in an fund-raising email blast to anti-light rail foes over the weekend. "Last week, we got in touch with 'Mr. Initiative' Tim Eyman and told him about the unfair and unjust disqualification of our stop light rail initiative. Tim dove right in and got us hooked up with Stephen Pidgeon, an absolutely brilliant constitutional attorney, to handle our lawsuit."

Who is Stephen Pidgeon?

Pidgeon unsuccessfully ran for attorney general in 2012 as a Republican and is the author of "The Obama Error," a book claiming President Barack Obama is a British citizen who changed his name from "Barak Mounir Ubayd" to "Barack Hussein Obama" in 1982 in British Columbia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #648  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 12:57 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,386
I was convinced I was reading an Onion article.
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #649  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 6:06 PM
JordanL JordanL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,004
Didn't ODOT write Portland a letter to veto-by-proxy on the CRC? And then didn't Portland essentially tell Vancouver that they would veto any bridge that doesn't have LRT?

Does Clark County really think this bridge is getting Oregon voter approval without LRT?

Portland has over $10 billion in transportation infrastructure, and Clark Co. is being given the option to buy into it for less than $500 million.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #650  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2013, 12:13 AM
davehogan davehogan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanL View Post
Didn't ODOT write Portland a letter to veto-by-proxy on the CRC? And then didn't Portland essentially tell Vancouver that they would veto any bridge that doesn't have LRT?

Does Clark County really think this bridge is getting Oregon voter approval without LRT?

Portland has over $10 billion in transportation infrastructure, and Clark Co. is being given the option to buy into it for less than $500 million.
It also will lose more federal funding than the light rail portion will cost, so they're just making it cost the states more, which will probably keep it from happening as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #651  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2013, 10:45 AM
JordanL JordanL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by davehogan View Post
It also will lose more federal funding than the light rail portion will cost, so they're just making it cost the states more, which will probably keep it from happening as well.
Between the fudging of numbers, Pearson airfield, and LRT, this project has made me dislike Vancouver more than any of my experiences with Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #652  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2013, 2:55 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
^I was walking to my car at Gateway last week and noticed some guy that also rode the train from downtown hop into his super sized truck with Washington license plates and a 'no loot rail' bumper sticker. WTF Vantucky?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #653  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2013, 2:27 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
Vancouver has problems
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #654  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2013, 3:12 AM
Grantenfuego's Avatar
Grantenfuego Grantenfuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
^I was walking to my car at Gateway last week and noticed some guy that also rode the train from downtown hop into his super sized truck with Washington license plates and a 'no loot rail' bumper sticker. WTF Vantucky?
Proof that even the Vancouverites complaining/ trying to block light rail will ride it when it gets built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #655  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2013, 5:03 PM
dubu's Avatar
dubu dubu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: bend oregon
Posts: 1,490
they should call it the purple line

because vancouver is gay literally and pot is legal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #656  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2013, 5:51 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,101
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #657  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2013, 8:56 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
they should call it the purple line

because vancouver is gay literally and pot is legal
It will be an extension of the yellow line.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #658  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2013, 11:13 PM
dubu's Avatar
dubu dubu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: bend oregon
Posts: 1,490
get rid of the yellow line. brt boat rapid transit/ bus rapid transit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #659  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2013, 4:47 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,386
Oregon House approves Columbia River Crossing plan -- with contingencies

Quote:
SALEM, Ore. -- The Oregon House of Representatives moved the I-5 Bridge Replacement Project -- for the span between Portland and Vancouver, Wash. -- "one step closer to reality today," according to a news release Monday from the Office of the House Speaker.

House Bill 2800 passed on a bipartisan 45-11 vote with four excused, according to the release.

http://www.koinlocal6.com/news/local/sto...rossing-plan/o_2Lzym26UCKY8rLOosG-Q.cspx
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #660  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2013, 6:36 AM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,078
Another view of Columbia River Crossing: Opponent's animated image shows before, after of project at Jantzen Beach


http://blog.oregonlive.com/commuting/2013/02/columbia_river_crossing_oppone.html#incart_river
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.