Quote:
Originally Posted by WestEndWander
|
It's a very stupid decision. They now need three grade separations over a train line that is used no more than 2 or 3 times per day. On top of that, the TOD opportunities are limited. They traded the 59 acres of developable Parker land to Andrew Marquess (google his name) in a 1 million dollar deal. The rest of the land is privately owned, and in an industrial park. If the city is looking to increase tax revenues, stimulating increased density along Pembina Highway would be the better way to do that.
Another justification that the city came up for their preferred routing is that it allows them to build an Active Transportation pathway. The pathway along phase 1 is so half assed that it's hard to believe the city is actually considering bikers. On top of that, they're slowly extending the separated bikeways up to Jubilee.
The city actually, at the time of the Parker land swap, had a good plan. They were going to build the RT line along the train line, extend Sterling Lyon to Taylor, and build an RT extension to the new Sterling Lyon section. This would have given the southwest neighbourhoods good RT access, fixed an area with bad roads, and kept the RT corridor along Pembina.
Here's a diagram from the Free Press from way back in 2009:
The shorter route that serves existing residents is the more logical route. This decision is important, as it will set a precedent for all future RT lines. Do we want to build for new developments or for existing residents? Is transit a revenue-generating investment, or a city service?