Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian
I'm moving this forward because I think that I make valid points. There is no argument against a stadium if everybody is in favour of a library at a similar cost.
|
The argument would be if a stadium would justify the cost—a library is used by every day by a huge swath of people, creates a repository of information and physical artifacts, and provides gathering space for community groups, lectures, meetings, rallies, clubs, etc. It's also a draw to the neighbourhood around it.
Stadiums only provide public benefit with a thriving sports franchise in place, and they tend to create desolate zones in the neighbourhoods nearby (not always, but usually). Public funding for stadiums is way riskier, and there's a history of them becoming huge civic money pits. Look at Edmonton's situation right now. As
this Globe writer put it after Edmonton Oilers owner tried to extract more public money for a new Edmonton stadium: "Maybe it’s just a terrible misread of how public sentiment has shifted these past few years—squarely away from taxpayer subsidies so that billionaire owners can finance new homes for their professional sport play-things."
If there was a good chance of us getting an NHL team, I'd change my tune, but frankly, I think the GTA is more likely to get a second team before Halifax gets anything.