HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3741  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2013, 11:48 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14by40 View Post
^^^ you mean fraser and broadway right
opps yup my bad
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #3742  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2013, 11:54 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,007
Great looking mid-sized infill.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3743  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 2:26 AM
Log1988's Avatar
Log1988 Log1988 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Poco
Posts: 81
Does anybody know what's being built on commercial drive between East 15th and East 16th? I can't find the related DP application.
     
     
  #3744  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 7:28 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,389
Vancouver mulling first co-housing complex
Will cohousing be Vancouver's next big thing?

From laneway homes to tiny condos, there are all kinds of creative ideas for making Metro Vancouver real estate more affordable.
A proposed co-housing project that would use shared facilities to lower costs and promote neighbourly socialization is heading to Vancouver city council Tuesday.

The planned 31-unit complex would feature a communal dining area, kitchen, gathering space, laundry room, music room, guest suite, exercise studio, roof-top deck, indoor play area, a teenagers’ lounge and a bicycle repair room.

Unlike co-operative buildings, which are legal entities that own real estate, co-housing is a privately owned lifestyle choice. The bulk of the proposed units would be available for purchase while at least two would be designated rentals.

VIDEO STORY AT http://bc.ctvnews.ca/vancouver-mulling-first-co-housing-complex-1.1152973#ixzz2KfS86aby
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #3745  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 10:27 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
I can't tell if they're going to incorporate the station building or not. Anyone have an answer?

Here's a drawing of the building:

Looks good. 8 storeys - not bad as an entrance marker to Cambie Village.

You can see the station in the render - but if you mean access from the condo directly into the station,
the answer would be "no" as the project is too small to warrant that kind of expense.
     
     
  #3746  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 10:40 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Looks good. 8 storeys - not bad as an entrance marker to Cambie Village.

You can see the station in the render - but if you mean access from the condo directly into the station,
the answer would be "no" as the project is too small to warrant that kind of expense.
What I meant was whether the building would be built over the station house. I couldn't tell in the render if the station is the backed out box or the portion of the building under the balcony with the people on it. I took another look and it appears to be both. So it's good news, the station won't be left orphaned on the plot of land.
     
     
  #3747  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 3:40 PM
Porfiry Porfiry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
What I meant was whether the building would be built over the station house. I couldn't tell in the render if the station is the backed out box or the portion of the building under the balcony with the people on it. I took another look and it appears to be both. So it's good news, the station won't be left orphaned on the plot of land.
It looks like it will be built atop the station. The blacked out portion is just the glass canopy. The station is underneath the building -- the windows in the render don't match reality, but the concrete structure does.

Also, from Wikipedia: "The station is designed to accommodate the future construction of a transit-connected development over the station entrance."
     
     
  #3748  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2013, 6:12 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Great to see that the station will be integrated into the building. And I am so glad to see that they are going for 8 storeys here.
__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #3749  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 12:52 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,529
I noticed new info for the Cambie & 12th (Whte Spot) condo -
2806-2850 Cambie Street.

It's now really UGLY!!
Looks like something they'd allow on Main in Mt. Pleasant.

Cambie & 12th Condo –
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/2806-2850cambie/index.htm

Here are the renders for the previous proposal:
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...s/2806-2850cambie/documents/pers_rev.pdf

Renderings of the current proposal: (ugly!!)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan.../2806-2850cambie/documents/pers_rev2.pdf


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by officedweller; Feb 13, 2013 at 1:15 AM.
     
     
  #3750  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 12:58 AM
Redkey's Avatar
Redkey Redkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I noticed new info for the Cambie & 12th (Whte Spot) condo -
2806-2850 Cambie.

It's now really UGLY!!
Looks like something they'd allow on Main in Mt. Pleasant.

Renderings: (ugly!!)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan.../2806-2850cambie/documents/pers_rev2.pdf

Here are the renders for the previous proposal:
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...s/2806-2850cambie/documents/pers_rev.pdf
I actually like it, I think its an improvement over the old renders.
     
     
  #3751  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:06 AM
BIMBAM's Avatar
BIMBAM BIMBAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redkey View Post
I actually like it, I think its an improvement over the old renders.
I agree, it's nice to see some architectural variety, and I love the massing and use of brick.
     
     
  #3752  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:07 AM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
Wow, that Cambie & 12th revised design is pretty awful!

Maybe an opportune time to change architects? Not sure why these guys were hired to begin with, but they sure are making it look difficult...

http://www.fougerearchitecture.ca/ (looks like their main body of work is mediocre suburban townhomes in the 90's)
     
     
  #3753  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:08 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIMBAM View Post
I agree, it's nice to see some architectural variety, and I love the massing and use of brick.
Are you two effing serious? I don't even know what to call this half-aborted spawn of PoMo and faux-historicism. No wonder we get such bad architecture in this city
     
     
  #3754  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:14 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,529
Also noticed this one for 4412-4488 Cambie Street
NE corner at 29th (turn-off to MidLothian Way)

Not nice either.... (same architects as the White Spot project (vastly different - PoMo this time (still ugly)).

http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/4412-4488cambie/index.htm
     
     
  #3755  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:21 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,529
My problem with the White Spot condo is that it is far too bulky (all of the brick on the upper levels primarily frame balconies - and the faux historicism is not suited to the Cambie corridor which is not early 20th century, but baby boomer 1940s vintage.)

It would fit in down in Chinatown (or forced to be imposed on Mt. Pleasant) (but would still be "heavy" - a comment I made on one of the other midrises being built down in Chinatown with the bricked corner balconies).
     
     
  #3756  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 1:22 AM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Also noticed this one for 4412-4488 Cambie Street
NE corner at 29th (turn-off to MidLothian Way)

Not nice either.... (same architects as the White Spot project (vastly different - PoMo this time (still ugly)).

http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/4412-4488cambie/index.htm
Wow, that's also bad...maybe this architect offered a groupon for 50% off architectural services .
     
     
  #3757  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 5:05 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
It would fit in down in Chinatown (or forced to be imposed on Mt. Pleasant) (but would still be "heavy" - a comment I made on one of the other midrises being built down in Chinatown with the bricked corner balconies).
funny you say that as I was thinking it would fit perfect on Union street with that clump of Brick faced condos there. I like the project but am not sure it fits in at that location as you say.
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #3758  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 5:52 AM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
well, if you ask me, it looks the same as almost every other major condominium project in vancouver, only difference is the massing, which brings a bulk that i think is sorely needed across the city.
     
     
  #3759  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 7:14 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Also noticed this one for 4412-4488 Cambie Street
NE corner at 29th (turn-off to MidLothian Way)

Not nice either.... (same architects as the White Spot project (vastly different - PoMo this time (still ugly)).

http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/4412-4488cambie/index.htm
Welcome to Gregorville which is shaping up to be a complete misuse of the city's one true ceremonial boulevard. Banal architecture rushed through in the name of "green" density. Our only hope is the housing market continues to tank and stalls these projects until saner heads prevail.
     
     
  #3760  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2013, 4:55 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Welcome to Gregorville which is shaping up to be a complete misuse of the city's one true ceremonial boulevard. Banal architecture rushed through in the name of "green" density. Our only hope is the housing market continues to tank and stalls these projects until saner heads prevail.
Gregorville ?????

Please: Gregoristan.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:51 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.