HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2013, 10:04 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I'm not an expert either, but it would also depend on whether the C car (if it has motors) contributes the same level of propulsion to the train as the A and B cars or whether it is just a "booster" (in which case it may place added load on the other cars).
If an A-C-B trainset had poorer performance specs than our existing trains, then it would impact the entire system. I really can't see Bombardier trying to pitch lower-performance trainsets, nor could I see how Translink would be willing to buy them.

Therefore, I strongly believe that "C" cars will contain exactly the same propulsive and braking technology as "A" and "B" cars. Not only does that maintain performance, but the parts commonality also lowers manufacturing and maintenance costs.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:34 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.