HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5021  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 12:40 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Opponents of amalgamation in this forum often point to Toronto as an example of how it didn't work, but there's a medium..........

Whereas, to balance locality needs with regional, "partial amalgamation" of Metro Vancouver's 21 municipalities would be most ideal. 21 municipalities is a whole lot to deal with in an already tiny geographical area. Instead, turn that 21 to maybe 12. Merge Vancouver with Richmond for instance. Merge the three jurisdictions in the North Shore. Merge the Tri-Cities. Etc. ......................

We're not talking a Toronto style amalgamation of what would be equivalent to merging all 21 municipalities in Metro Vancouver into just 1. .........................

I think the idea of amalgamation is polarized by some, that it's this (and has to be) some false huge scary monster.... but in reality, there exists a middle in the scale of amalgamation - a scale that is actually beneficial.

The creation of Metropolitan Toronto back in the 60s, with the City and the Boroughs seems to fit that "happy medium" which you're referring to. Would that be roughly correct?
     
     
  #5022  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 11:26 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
They do a service to us all. Those people shouldn't be on the road in the first place, and public transit makes sure they're off. Poetic justice I say.
In that case...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPH-rNUmBjw
     
     
  #5023  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 3:38 PM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
lol @ the videos. I remember watching those.

And I agree that by all accounts that Derek Corrigan just wants all the transit/transportation improvements and associated development funds to himself and no one else... or otherwise he'll start complaining to no end about this excuse or that.

Anyway, at the rate that Metro Vancouver is heading, we're certainly going to end up with a lot of rival cities or groupings... We already see it with Vancouver vs Burnaby vs Surrey, City of Langley vs Township of Langley, the two municipalities (the city and district) of North Vancouver, etc.
     
     
  #5024  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 5:42 PM
The_Henry_Man The_Henry_Man is offline
HA
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Cloud, MN/Richmond, BC
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Whereas, to balance locality needs with regional, "partial amalgamation" of Metro Vancouver's 21 municipalities would be most ideal. 21 municipalities is a whole lot to deal with in an already tiny geographical area. Instead, turn that 21 to maybe 12. Merge Vancouver with Richmond for instance. Merge the three jurisdictions in the North Shore. Merge the Tri-Cities. Etc.
NO!!! I don't want COV's wacky radical tree-hugging nutjobs and radical socialists destroying my city of Richmond after they already destroyed their own! Thanks but no thanks. Those tree huggers are more than welcome to stay in West End or Yaletown.

(Anyways, back to topic)
     
     
  #5025  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 7:22 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
What civic official in BC isn't a union puppet?
I think there's about 3 of them...
     
     
  #5026  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 7:39 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Thanks for the info and links.

I think someone on here brought up a great analogy: that if we "spread the wealth" across the region and diffuse what should be in Downtown Vancouver, we'll end up as a region of a bunch of Saskatoons.

That was a brilliant analogy. Fact is, a strong central city enables greater economies of scale for more and better things (whether it be jobs, attractions, infrastructure, you name it) - not just for the central city itself, but for the entire region...which otherwise would not see the benefits incurred were it not for the focus on the central city.

That's why I'm greatly opposed to the idea of turning Surrey into a full-fledged second "metropolitan area" for Metro Vancouver.

Not saying there shouldn't be regional town centres though, those are fantastic and are within the medium - far short of becoming a metropolitan area.

And it's also why I'm a supporter of amalgamation of the region's numerous municipalities into larger clusters. That's how we'll get big picture thinking going instead of all the local-focused and petty squabbling. Regional needs and interests are thrown out the door in favour of ensuring their own municipalities keep job creation within their city and to also ensure their municipal tax revenues keep growing. It's all a petty local competition when we should be thinking regionally, and competing not against each other but rather nationally (Calgary, Toronto) and internationally.
Stop it with this already. You're making way too much sense! Such things are not allowed in this region. Socially engineered ideologies only!
     
     
  #5027  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 8:35 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
Stop it with this already. You're making way too much sense! Such things are not allowed in this region. Socially engineered ideologies only!


Ain't that the truth !!! Truth? Did I say "truth?" Truth is good ... but only if it's politically correct ... and made in BC.
     
     
  #5028  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 9:46 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
/me points to the topic?
     
     
  #5029  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 9:59 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man View Post
NO!!! I don't want COV's wacky radical tree-hugging nutjobs and radical socialists destroying my city of Richmond after they already destroyed their own! Thanks but no thanks. Those tree huggers are more than welcome to stay in West End or Yaletown.

(Anyways, back to topic)
I was hoping Richmond's progressive nature, common sense and its focus on things that really matter would help dilute the Vancouver crazies. :p
     
     
  #5030  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 3:42 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
I don't think many of my "tree hugger" friends can afford to live in Yaletown.
     
     
  #5031  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 6:22 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,723
Ya, those idiots in Vancouver... Surrey is the wave of the future. Only Vancouver socialists would reject a casino right?
     
     
  #5032  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 7:08 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
In all fairness, I've quite warmed up to the Vancouver "crazies." In the past few months, they've started to really focus on the big picture issues, such as the one this topic is named after. We haven't heard of anything remotely equivalent to backyard chickens in more than a year.
     
     
  #5033  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 7:24 AM
The_Henry_Man The_Henry_Man is offline
HA
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Cloud, MN/Richmond, BC
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
In all fairness, I've quite warmed up to the Vancouver "crazies." In the past few months, they've started to really focus on the big picture issues, such as the one this topic is named after. We haven't heard of anything remotely equivalent to backyard chickens in more than a year.
Agreed. At least they didn't cave into that lunatic Gordon Price. Getting the feds to contribute to greater proportion of the funds (say around 60-65% of the total cost) for the M-Line extension will be the biggest factor.

But to be honest, when's the last time the COV really focused on luring big companies back to downtown core and set up HQ here (I understand, it's going to be tough. High real estate price is already one), as a core city policy? But it's good start they're starting to build several business-only skyscrapers, such as Telus Gardens/Bentall 6, to stop our city's slide to a resort town. But I don't think the architects or city planners have gone far enough. Instead, what I really would love to see is build 700+ft business skyscrapers similar to IDS Tower in downtown Minneapolis (57 floors). Even just one or two is already good enough, and goes a long way to really improve our skyline.
     
     
  #5034  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 8:21 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man View Post
Agreed. At least they didn't cave into that lunatic Gordon Price. Getting the feds to contribute to greater proportion of the funds (say around 60-65% of the total cost) for the M-Line extension will be the biggest factor.

But to be honest, when's the last time the COV really focused on luring big companies back to downtown core and set up HQ here (I understand, it's going to be tough. High real estate price is already one), as a core city policy? But it's good start they're starting to build several business-only skyscrapers, such as Telus Gardens/Bentall 6, to stop our city's slide to a resort town. But I don't think the architects or city planners have gone far enough. Instead, what I really would love to see is build 700+ft business skyscrapers similar to IDS Tower in downtown Minneapolis (57 floors). Even just one or two is already good enough, and goes a long way to really improve our skyline.
The City of Vancouver's powers with regards to job creation are quite limited, although I suppose we could say the same thing about the City's role with making the Broadway extension a reality.

The COV could definitely put a bigger focus on its job creation aspirations, but that would probably lie with:
1) cutting business property taxes
2) cutting down on the red tape (i.e. Old Stock Exchange vs. nearby residents)
3) promotion

The power lies with the provincial government...they could make the Broadway Line happen if they really wanted to. Just like Gateway, BC Place, and the convention centre. And the same can be said about job creation, that the province has the tools required to drive back business into BC/Vancouver....just like how one previous provincial government used these tools to drive businesses and jobs out of the province in the 1990s.

I've said this before but the provincial government has largely played the role of giving Vancouver the great things it's known for and for also spurring the city's economy.
- Expo 86
- every SkyTrain line
- BC Place, Canada Place
- convention centre
- Olympics
- further spurring the city's real estate industry, beginning with its sales of the Expo lands to Li Ka Shing for redevelopment
- the PNE as an entertainment institution

The only things I can think of that comes to anywhere equivalent to any of these that the City of Vancouver has been directly responsible for is Library Square (Gordon Campbell) and the three bridges that cross False Creek today. And maybe the Olympic Village, although I see that more as a catalyst of the provincial government.

The next City of Vancouver driven project of any equivalence would be the streetcar.

If I had a wish list for building development projects, it would be (in no particular order, and does not include transport infrastructure):

- 400-700 foot office/hotel/retail buildings on Bay parkade site

- 400-700 foot office/hotel/retail buildings at old Canada Post

- Massive new 500,000 square foot VAG at Larwill Park

- Renovated and expanded (under Georgia Plaza) VAG courthouse building at Robson for the new home of the Museum of Vancouver. Including the filling/removal of the Robson Square pit where the ice rink is, to create a flat and large at-grade plaza that is covered by a glass roof similar to the proposed clam shell glass roof or the old Plaza of Nations roof. Seriously, we have to start realizing that the weather is only nice here about 5 months of the year max. BTW, Bing Thom's proposal to turn the VAG courthouse building into a performing arts centre will only make the building dead except when people are going in/out of events held there.

- 400-800 foot office/hotel/retail buildings at the Waterfront Station hub redevelopment precinct. The tallest tower, a 800-foot office building, would give the Vancouver skyline the same signature feel that the 2 IFC building gives to the Hong Kong skyline (it's the tallest in the skyline). The area will also include: the large indoor glass roofed transit concourse and bus street behind the Waterfront Station building, as proposed by the City; an expansion of the Vancouver Convention Centre along the water immediately east of Canada Place, with more meeting rooms, ballrooms, another exhibition hall, and a 1,800-seat theatre; a 30,000-seat stadium for the Whitecaps; and new passenger ferry terminals for new passenger-only BC Ferries services to the Island, SeaBus, and private ferry services.

- the approval of PAVCO's full vision for the casino-hotel-entertainment complex west of BC Place

- a new hotel complex at the Westin Bayshore, including a 600-foot tower

- further densification of the West End, replacing aging buildings and low-rises, with buildings ranging from 300-500 feet

- A 2,000-seat performing arts centre taking a portion of the ridiculously large and useless but planned Creekside Park extension

- the expansion of Science World to increase its size by 50%, to accommodate the new and merged home of the H.R. Macmillan Space Centre. The Vanier Park building will be utilized for another museum purpose. This would require taking up some of Creekside Park.

- adding a lot more restaurants, bars, and pubs along our waterfront parks. The seawall and our waterfront parks are otherwise designed solely as an obligation to exercise. They are highly inactive and unexciting places to be when the weather turns cold. I'm not against public space, I'm just against public space that is poorly designed, uncreative, and not well-used during most of the year. I don't buy in that Downtown Vancouver needs more green lawn public space, that there's some silly arbitrary green space quota to be met.

- further densification of the Broadway Corridor, with buildings ranging from 6-30 storeys.

- the completion of the seawall at Kitsilano

- to fulfill the "entertainment" concept of an "entertainment district" around BC Place/Rogers Arena/QE Theatre, the construction of bars, nightclubs, and pubs in and under the viaducts and the new highrises that weave themselves into the viaducts

- Plaza of Nations site: to maintain the "entertainment district" concept, the lower levels (on the podium) will be nothing other than restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and pubs (a continuation of the same thing at the viaducts, described above). Above the podiums are exclusively office towers (that do not significantly impede on views of BC Place) ranging from 10-30 storeys. The office traffic will keep pedestrian activity flow during the day, and the vacant offices won't be an issue for all the night time activity. On the edge of the water will be a glass covered outdoor plaza and amphitheatre.

- Rogers Arena towers....no longer rental buildings, replaced as exclusively office and a hotel. It will not impede on the activities of Rogers Arena nor night time activity in the area. At the base of the towers, more restaurants and bars.

- add a 40-storey, 500,000 square foot office building to International Village mall. Along with a prominent retail anchor, it'll bring much more pedestrian traffic to the mall - will bring real and some "serious" retailers to the mall in hopes of turning this into Downtown Vancouver's second "serious" mall after Pacific Centre. In addition, major office developments will be encouraged nearby to provide more pedestrian activity (developments through the preservation of heritage facades or even the whole building itself and then adding floors on top - like the old Stock Exchange, on the extreme, or that development on Beatty). Like it or not, Downtown is growing eastward and this would all be part of the DTES/Chinatown transition and rebirth.

- another elementary school somewhere in Downtown within a mid-rise building or on a podium of a tower (see NYC's recently built elementary school for 600 kids at 8 Spruce St). The enrollment demand is high in Downtown Vancouver. A true urban school, like the ones in New York. If it's a mid-rise, green/outdoor space will be on the rooftop.

- Lonsdale in North Vancouver: a 200,000 square foot National Maritime Museum at the Pier to replace the dinky museum at Kitsilano

- the doubling in size of the Vancouver Aquarium in Stanley Park, expanding on the grounds the Stanley Park Zoo once stood on

- in the very, very, very long-term: relocation of the Port of Vancouver facilities in Vancouver to new terminal facilities and infrastructure at the port in Tsawwassen. Money from lands sold at Downtown port will be used to build the new port in Tsawwassen. In place of the old port (which begins with the westernmost part of the port's railyard), the expansion of the Vancouver skyline...the next generation's North False Creek, with a touch of Yaletown through the conversion of some of the old/historic port buildings into other usages. They could even keep a few of the massive red port cranes, maintain them as centrepieces of public/green space below.

- Queen Elizabeth Park: the construction of the observation tower that was rejected by NIMBYs a few years ago; and the restoration of the Bloedel Conservatory to become a world-class bird aviary and research centre.

- Langara Golf Course into a City Zoo: Langara Golf Course re-purposed into a world-class 120-acre zoo operated with the same non-profit education/conservation/research-based business plan as the Vancouver Aquarium. Animals will largely come from the closure of the Greater Vancouver Zoo. And since we seem to be on the way towards having a close and friendly relationship with China, playing with international panda diplomacy one of the zoo's feature attraction will be pandas. :p

Last edited by mr.x; Dec 2, 2012 at 11:53 AM.
     
     
  #5035  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 8:59 AM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 688
^^ mr X for Mayor!! Love this list!
     
     
  #5036  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 3:58 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man View Post
... Instead, what I really would love to see is build 700+ft business skyscrapers similar to IDS Tower in downtown Minneapolis (57 floors). Even just one or two is already good enough, and goes a long way to really improve our skyline.
In your mind, who, exactly, would build these towers? Pension funds? REITs? Who, exactly, would build a 700' office tower on spec based on the profile of Class A office tenants in Vancouver? It's all well and good to pine for a more muscular, commercial skyline, but the sort of building you long for is unlikely to be developed in the foreseeable future. 300', 400', half-million square foot towers are a distinct possibility, but even some the country's biggest commercial real estate players like bcIMC, Manulife, and Cadillac Fairview are only prepared to put projects into play that are in the 200 to 400,000 square foot range. Why? Because the tenant pool that wants downtown Class A office space is not large enough to warrant the risk of building the scale of office tower you are imagining.

If there aren't enough large tenants, even with a low prevailing vacancy rate, to make the pro-formas of an office tower work then it won't get built. Don't forget that a lot of the back-office floor space that may well fill Minneapolis' 700' IDS Tower are unlikely to locate in Vancouver's CBD. They are likely to locate in nearby projects like the Rize Containers Project on Terminal, bcIMC's Broadway Tech Centre, which churns out 150,000 square foot, large-floorplate buildings like a metronome, or in PCI's Marine Gateway office building. Nobody wants to flood the market with space and depress rents, or lose prime tenants to a competitor. The players who build office buildings are inherently conservative and they will not build a skyline defining tower just for the sake of it. They build office buildings to make money with the lowest possible amount of risk and capital.

With all of that said, I do think that office towers with significant square footage, and perhaps significant height, will be built in Vancouver in the years ahead. I think that the City's clear policy of restricting residential in the CBD Shoulder area to projects that include a significant office and employment component, coupled with the additional 2 FSR added to as-of-right zoning, will make some pro-formas work. That area is essentially a land bank for future development; a greenfield for office space.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Dec 2, 2012 at 4:24 PM.
     
     
  #5037  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 4:20 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man View Post
.............

........ But it's good start they're starting to build several business-only skyscrapers, such as Telus Gardens/Bentall 6, to stop our city's slide to a resort town. But I don't think the architects or city planners have gone far enough. Instead, what I really would love to see is build 700+ft business skyscrapers similar to IDS Tower in downtown Minneapolis (57 floors). Even just one or two is already good enough, and goes a long way to really improve our skyline.


I fear the slide of Vancouver away from a corporate centre in to a "resort town," and feel this might be changed, firstly by diversifying the city's economy and attracting major corporations.

That being said, yes, something like the IDS Tower (maybe even with its own Crystal Court) would go great in the CBD. Maybe even one or two more. Although it's been pointed out that the econmic climate may not not lend itself to this currently, it's always good to have a "bank" of ideas in stock.
     
     
  #5038  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 4:41 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I have more modest wishes, like that people stick to the topic and consider using metric
     
     
  #5039  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 5:09 PM
ryanmaccdn ryanmaccdn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I have more modest wishes, like that people stick to the topic and consider using metric
Won't happen.... Metric = lame
     
     
  #5040  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 6:32 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I have more modest wishes, like that people stick to the topic and consider using metric
Mod drunk with power!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:33 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.