HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations



Related Pages:  • San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum  • San Francisco Highrise Developments Map


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4161  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2012, 6:10 AM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
     
     
  #4162  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2012, 4:14 PM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 656
Three Tower Project between Harrison Street, Second and Third.

Cresleigh Development is proposing to construct three towers on the south side of Harrison Street between Second and Third. The application calls for a 478,000-square-foot office building, a 406,000-square-foot residential tower and a 300-room hotel along the south side of Harrison.

Read the article here..

It's also been reported here Socketsite



I see a fight over shadows on South Park.
__________________
I ♥ Manhattanization

Last edited by San Frangelino; Nov 19, 2012 at 7:19 PM.
     
     
  #4163  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2012, 5:53 PM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
I'm excited about his development, and the Central Corridor project in general (http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=2557). Can't wait to see some renders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by San Frangelino View Post
I see a fight over shadows on South Park
I doubt it, seeing as South Park is south of the towers. The Earth would have to flip on its axis for those towers to cast shadows on south park . Due to the fact that we're in the northern hemisphere, the sun stays in the southern part of the sky, and shadows will only be cast northwards.

Though on second thought, I wouldn't put it past idiot NIMBYs to argue that shadows would magically land there somehow.
     
     
  #4164  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2012, 7:08 PM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
We finally have a new render for 41 Tehama:









http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2012/...ed_design_and_timing_scoop.html#comments

It's designed by Arquitectonica now, not SOM. Looks kind of boring and boxy in my opinion, though at least it's shiny. The design would look a little better/less stubby if it were at 550' instead of chopped down to 342', but it could be much worse too.
     
     
  #4165  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2012, 2:14 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,568
41 Thema

tech12 - I agree with you, not somehing to write home about.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 55th year in 2026 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #4166  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2012, 2:19 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,568
Crescent Heights - 10th & Market Sts.

I took this picture November 26th. This is the south facade of the complex. I'm alarmed by the dark color & design. Hopefully the 10th Street & Market Street face will be a lot more friendly. There is a grey building across the street at Polk & Market Streets - we don't need another one. The artist's rendering I had seen in the past presented a light colored building.


Img_0729
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 55th year in 2026 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #4167  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2012, 3:22 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
From what I can tell, the Market Street side will be mixed--some of the dark stuff, some more glassy stuff. Here are the renderings for comparison:







Source: Handler Architects
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #4168  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2012, 9:37 PM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
now we're talking: http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2012/11/29/supervisor_ceqa_changes.php

moreover, appeals would be even more limited on large sites (over 5 acres), just in time for the basketball stadium.
     
     
  #4169  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2012, 10:14 PM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by easy as pie View Post
now we're talking: http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2012/11/29/supervisor_ceqa_changes.php

moreover, appeals would be even more limited on large sites (over 5 acres), just in time for the basketball stadium.
Nice! I hope it gets passed...the NIMBYs are probably going to raise hell over it.
     
     
  #4170  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 6:02 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
Planning Department .pdf for 41 Tehama.
     
     
  #4171  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 6:43 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech12 View Post
...the NIMBYs are probably going to raise hell over it.
yep!
     
     
  #4172  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2012, 7:34 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,568
10th and Market Streets

A milestone. The construction of the 12 story part of Crescent Heights facing Market Street has reached the top floor.


10th & Market Sts. by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/antinous/]

My photograph next to Handler Architeck drawing
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 55th year in 2026 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))

Last edited by Jerry of San Fran; Nov 30, 2012 at 7:48 AM.
     
     
  #4173  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 3:21 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
New renders and info for 181 Fremont have been released:

http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2012/...oop_181_fremont_redesigned_and.html#more

Quote:
Having been waylaid by the market, the project is now making its way back through planning, but the proposed steel framed tower has been downsized to 52 stories reaching 700 feet with a decorative screen reaching to 745 feet and a spire to the 802-foot mark

As proposed, the tower would contain a subterranean garage for 200 cars; 2,000 square feet of retail; 404,000 square feet of office space on floors 3 to 35; 74 condos on floors 38 to 52; and 7,000 square feet of residential amenities and a two story open air terrace around the building for residents on level 36.

A bridge to the elevated City Park atop the future Transit Center extends from floor 5.




     
     
  #4174  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 7:41 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,568
181 Fremont

Tech12 -Thanks for the update. Nice looking. I do find the pinnacle to be a bit sharp to my taste- ouch!
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 55th year in 2026 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #4175  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 9:23 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
I love 181 Fremont--that's one cool proposal.
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #4176  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 10:31 PM
mongoXZ's Avatar
mongoXZ mongoXZ is offline
Pipe Layer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 316
Reminds me of Bank of Hong Kong Tower

     
     
  #4177  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 10:53 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,901
looks fantastic. thats a beautiful rendering.
     
     
  #4178  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 11:29 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
I love 181 Fremont--that's one cool proposal.
Me too--I agree. Build it without shortening or VE'ing it!
     
     
  #4179  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 8:14 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,675
181 Fremont is looking nice! This is exactly a style San Francisco could do well with in its skyline. It looks very moder and very sharp, but without being pretentious. I'm getting a bit bored with deconstructivism.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
     
     
  #4180  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 11:40 PM
tall/awkward tall/awkward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 204
Lots of nice new renderings on this thread!

If I had any talent, I would update the pictures on the SF building diagram...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.