Quote:
Originally Posted by (Eco)nomy_404
Don't get me wrong, it's really too bad that those employees at Hostess will lose their jobs. Those in Utah, though, will be lucky to live in such a healthy, rapidly growing labor market. Those 600 jobs will be more than off-set by Adobe's 1,000 easily. We are very fortunate to live in the state with the 5th lowest rate in the nation! Even for those of us who are employed, having a healthy labor market is great for upward mobility to higher-paying jobs! 
|
There seems to be a lot of interest from other foody giants in buying Hostess, or at least major facets(brands) of it's business. I would hope that a State like Utah, which is far more business friendly and competitive will emerge from a buyout with it's local brands intact. Maybe this will even be an opportunity for Hostess to expand in Utah, under different ownership.
It's crazy some of the stories, like not being able to deliver Wonder Bread, and Twinkies on the same delivery truck. Then, once the truck arrives, the driver is not allowed to unload the product. This kind of costly union inefficiency won't be allowed under new ownership, so States like California will lose the support of the new company, whereas a State like Utah should reap the benefit of relocation. Utah is a very strategically located State for efficient distribution, in addition to it's highly reputable workforce and politically friendly business climate. Of course, it's all contingent on Hostess remaining in the U.S.