HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4021  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 4:42 PM
bcp's Avatar
bcp bcp is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,143
WOW...not even a slight mention of transit....22% is about...oh...6,000 on average? boo hoo, park on the street, deal with it...

also funny that they dont mention how many privately owned pay parking STRUCTURES (which we can assume are permanent)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4022  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 7:25 PM
EngiNerd's Avatar
EngiNerd EngiNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,003
Exactly, there is no shortage of parking, their rationale just seems completely off base...but they have to spend that $15 mil from RTD on parking, so really they probably have to build a parking garage to use that up.

Their not mentioning transit is the reason they never got a stop there in the first place...but its a huge part of the picture now, and will be even more so once the other lines are built out.
__________________
"The engineer is the key figure in the material progress of the world. It is his engineering that makes a reality of the potential value of science by translating scientific knowledge into tools, resources, energy and labor to bring them into the service of man. To make contributions of this kind the engineer requires the imagination to visualize the need of society and to appreciate what is possible as well as the technological and broad social age understanding to bring his vision to reality."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4023  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 8:35 PM
bcp's Avatar
bcp bcp is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,143
agreed...but what is scary is the tone...doesnt sound like "great we have a parking garage"...it sounds like "we must continue to create more parking"....this will be good for pedi-cabs on blake for sure!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4024  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:14 PM
Zmapper Zmapper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 210
I would think more people would take advantage of RTD Rockies Ride buses. Unfortunately, at a $30 Regional fare for a family of four plus a $4 parking fee if your live out-of-district, it is by far cheaper to drive to the stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4025  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:19 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
That's a reason I drive to ball games (or downtown generally sometimes) also. The train is just as convenient, and quite close to my house. But who goes to ball games alone? And by the time you have two people going together, it's significantly cheaper to drive and park.

Same problem, incidentally, that I-70 rail will have - your pricing competition is not a single occupant vehicle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4026  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:24 PM
EngiNerd's Avatar
EngiNerd EngiNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,003
This is true, the economics of it definitely don't make as much sense for groups of over about 2 people. However that said, if it does become harder to park, the convenience of driving will continue to decrease, and also with dwindling parking supply comes higher rates, also leading to people potentially using the train more.

The SE corridor trains are still packed to go to a Rockies game on the weekend, even though they suck as a team.

In the end though, I think the Metro Ballpark district really just wants to keep the revenue stream coming in from parkers, they don't see anything from those riding the RTD until they enter the park. That and they have $15m burning a hole in their pocket it sounds like.
__________________
"The engineer is the key figure in the material progress of the world. It is his engineering that makes a reality of the potential value of science by translating scientific knowledge into tools, resources, energy and labor to bring them into the service of man. To make contributions of this kind the engineer requires the imagination to visualize the need of society and to appreciate what is possible as well as the technological and broad social age understanding to bring his vision to reality."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4027  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 10:25 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngiNerd View Post
This is true, the economics of it definitely don't make as much sense for groups of over about 2 people. However that said, if it does become harder to park, the convenience of driving will continue to decrease, and also with dwindling parking supply comes higher rates, also leading to people potentially using the train more.

The SE corridor trains are still packed to go to a Rockies game on the weekend, even though they suck as a team.

In the end though, I think the Metro Ballpark district really just wants to keep the revenue stream coming in from parkers, they don't see anything from those riding the RTD until they enter the park. That and they have $15m burning a hole in their pocket it sounds like.
Very true, as parking gets more expensive, transit becomes more competitive. But then the entire experience of going to a game becomes more expensive. The baseball district is in the business of providing the infrastructure for the baseball infrastructure - not making transit more appealing. If they have it within their power (and budget) to provide parking, and that keeps baseball more affordable than other alternatives, then that's their responsibility. I don't have to like it, but I can't fault them for it.

Maybe RTD should put a little bit of effort into revamping its asinine fare structure, rather than us complaining about a baseball stadium wanting to replace 4,000+ nearby parking spaces that have been lost in recent years. This just isn't a discussion any rational regular joe would even begin to understand.

EDIT: We were talking about the fare structure at the forum meet this weekend, and about proposed plans for the airport train to replicate the current (very expensive, barely competitive) skyride fare structure. But another example...and not a great one, because I don't necessarily care what happens with out-of-district riders. But it's just as relevant for any suburban riders.

When my mother and brother come up to Denver on weekends for theater - we've looked at what it would cost for them to take the train in. For two of them to park at Lincoln, and ride into downtown and back, is presently $22. It's roughly 19 miles each way - so say 40 miles, at 20mpg... it's $8 in gas to drive it r/t, plus maybe $5 to park. I simply do not understand how a $10 round trip fare from park meadows to downtown is justifiable in any normal world. It's insane. It's BARELY competitive for a single driver (and I imagine that's why the fare is set there). But even discussing the light rail for two people is lunacy. Or at any time other than peak parking times (regular weekday commuting) for a single driver. It's set up to be a commuter system, period.

Last edited by bunt_q; Oct 30, 2012 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4028  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 11:02 PM
EngiNerd's Avatar
EngiNerd EngiNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,003
Actually if they were coming from out of district (I'm assuming) it would be $24 for them to ride the LRT wouldn't it (not including gas)? $5 each way X 2 + $4 for parking at the PnR. But yeah, I have done that calculation many times, and for me going downtown with my girlfriend on the LRT and parking at the Arapahoe Station, it just doesn't make much sense unless:

A) There is a ton of traffic
B) We both plan on drinking and need the train ride to sober up (and hopefully not miss the last train at 2:12AM)
C) There is no C

So if they carry this ludicrous rate scheme to the airport, it could end up more than it is for say the Airport Shuttle? It does make more sense on a weekday for sure when parking rates downtown are higher, but on the weekend when you can park in pretty much any garage downtown for $5 for the evening after 5pm, the math just doesn't work.
__________________
"The engineer is the key figure in the material progress of the world. It is his engineering that makes a reality of the potential value of science by translating scientific knowledge into tools, resources, energy and labor to bring them into the service of man. To make contributions of this kind the engineer requires the imagination to visualize the need of society and to appreciate what is possible as well as the technological and broad social age understanding to bring his vision to reality."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4029  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 11:33 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
And it depends on how much walking you have to do for transit to work for you. If you're a person who's willing to walk 6-8 blocks, you can park for a couple bucks any day of the week.

Is out of district parking up to $4? I thought it was $2, dang.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4030  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2012, 3:03 AM
EngiNerd's Avatar
EngiNerd EngiNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,003
Yup, $4 for out of district....$2 for in district per day after the first 24hrs.
__________________
"The engineer is the key figure in the material progress of the world. It is his engineering that makes a reality of the potential value of science by translating scientific knowledge into tools, resources, energy and labor to bring them into the service of man. To make contributions of this kind the engineer requires the imagination to visualize the need of society and to appreciate what is possible as well as the technological and broad social age understanding to bring his vision to reality."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4031  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2012, 4:44 PM
bobg bobg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 474
I know this is unlikely to pass, but what about a tax or fee on tickets that allow people to use their ticket as an RTD pass to and from the game?

Even with free/subsidized transit you know a large percentage of people are still going to drive so the tax can be significantly lower than the absurdly high regional fare. You end up with drivers subsidizing non-drivers, and price sensitive people do not see parking as a barrier to going to a Rockies game since transit will be priced into it. Of course there may be more demand for transit than current supply, but if RTD gets enough revenue they may be able to adjust accordingly.

I guess my thinking behind it is that Red Rocks charges a parking fee on every ticket and they get away with it. It's a low fee at Red Rocks and not everyone drives there (a lot of event buses), and certainly not everyone drives to Red Rocks solo. If transit is the most practical way to get to and out of Rockies games why shouldn't we do something similar?

Or I guess RTD could just re-visit it's fare structure.

Last edited by bobg; Oct 31, 2012 at 4:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4032  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2012, 5:43 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
That's a neat idea. Ecopasses based on ticketed events rather than neighborhoods.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4033  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2012, 7:26 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Roll transit into ticket prices, make it free. I like that. You'd also have to reduce parking costs in facility lots, otherwise it's just a tax on attending those events, which would run counter to what any of those event operators want (they are not in the business of pushing transit, their business is to push boost their own attendance), but it might level the playing field.

But that only works for facilities that have reasonable transit access. That would be absurd for, say, the zoo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4034  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2012, 9:45 PM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
If Amendment 64 passes, wouldn't that transform a large amount of current, illegal, non-taxed, black market sales of marijuana, into legal, sales taxed purchases of marijuana? In other words, an instant boost to sales tax collections? I'm just wondering how much this might infuse RTD with additional sales tax collections for FasTracks.
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4035  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2012, 11:12 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Read Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. At some point the state will "just say no" to free wheeling pot use. Even if it passes, I would hope the general assembly simply ignores it. If you disagree with federal law, then you need to work to change it. You don't get to just ignore it. Think about all the stuff the red states would like to just ignore.

Even if the state does decide to enforce it, I am pretty sure it calls for a state excise tax, which wouldn't generate anything for RTD.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4036  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2012, 8:48 PM
the1wags the1wags is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
They are hanging the first arch on the north side of the train hall.

http://www.earthcam.com/client/kiewit/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4037  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2012, 1:57 AM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
Read Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. At some point the state will "just say no" to free wheeling pot use. Even if it passes, I would hope the general assembly simply ignores it. If you disagree with federal law, then you need to work to change it. You don't get to just ignore it. Think about all the stuff the red states would like to just ignore.

Even if the state does decide to enforce it, I am pretty sure it calls for a state excise tax, which wouldn't generate anything for RTD.
Speaking of politics... I should have asked this sooner, who was the best RTD person to vote for?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the1wags View Post
They are hanging the first arch on the north side of the train hall.

http://www.earthcam.com/client/kiewit/
It looks so delicious.
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4038  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2012, 9:41 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
So this is happening in Oslo, Norway called 'Barcode' where they are developing underutilized train yards, etc. (obviously more heavy transit than we are) but we can hope that DUS will get this urban!!


Photos from kingofthehill Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=202409


Photos from kingofthehill Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=202409
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream

Last edited by RyanD; Nov 22, 2012 at 4:44 AM. Reason: Brainlapse for giving credit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4039  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2012, 10:10 PM
Zmapper Zmapper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 210
At first glance the first picture looks strikingly similar to the 16th Street Union Station Bridge (forgot its actual name).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4040  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2012, 12:39 AM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
That's the anti-Colotecture. Urban form, good. Architecture, bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.