HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2012, 4:16 PM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
Looks great, thanks for posting the link and render. I've always regretted not taking any courses at the Surrey campus when I was an SFU student, it's such a gorgeous building. The thought of having a multi-building post-secondary campus right in the middle of Downtown Surrey is very exciting, I think it's one of the best things about Surrey's city centre and can only get better if the campus grows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2012, 11:51 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whalleyboy View Post
You know back in the day Vancouver and other cities NoF use have a lot of farm space to that it spread out if you look they pretty much left none of it. Now Surrey and other SoF cities well pushing out into area toward farm land yes. But hey all other Cities NoF were no better back in the day. Except now there is ALR in place. Although its worth noting surrey had plans to save farm land way before the ALR was put in place.
As for green spaces you Lets compare big massive green parks between Vancouver and Surrey. Please tell me all the big green spaces you have around Vancouver that can compare to the amount in surrey
In just north Surrey alone: Green timbers, Bear creek, Tynhead, Surrey Bend(this alone pretty much is equal to stanley park), Hawthorn, Then on top of those green space we have are green veins that run all around the city to keep the green areas connected

Yes surrey is having cul-de-sac/winding road single detached development. But these are in areas where they do not want to see High development or lot of through traffic areas. Its called traffic calming. It allows cities to have nice quite neighbor hoods and not have to deal with high volumes of traffic.
Plus it pushes high density towards areas where the city wants it to be.
It gave me a headache trying to read your post lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2012, 12:00 PM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansky View Post
langley, white rock and surrey "mainland" r combining to become one gigantic suburb, there is considerable future in projects like the berazan, if the economy could handle it...

why not build a gigantic casino - edgewater surrey, and an ice rink in this area...
White Rock will always remain secluded from 'Mainland Surrey' as you call it because of it's geological location. As for Langley and Surrey I'd say that both cities have been one giant suburb for the past 10 years and you can include Delta in there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2012, 6:50 PM
sryboy's Avatar
sryboy sryboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by skymaster View Post
White Rock will always remain secluded from 'Mainland Surrey' as you call it because of it's geological location.
Within 20 years White rock will be back in the fold and part of Surrey. They are almost already bankrupt ,use most of Surrey's municiple resources now and cant raise taxes much higher. I have friends who used to laugh when it was suggested that W/R would be back into Surrey but now they too realize that its going to happen. White rock is too small to make it on its own unless they follow New West's model of high density. Only thing delaying it is ego.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 5:50 AM
Skyhigh8 Skyhigh8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 28
wish they can bring the highway directly into City Centre without too many traffic lights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 4:45 PM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by sryboy View Post
Within 20 years White rock will be back in the fold and part of Surrey. They are almost already bankrupt ,use most of Surrey's municiple resources now and cant raise taxes much higher. I have friends who used to laugh when it was suggested that W/R would be back into Surrey but now they too realize that its going to happen. White rock is too small to make it on its own unless they follow New West's model of high density. Only thing delaying it is ego.
New Westminster has a huge industry and job base, no way White Rock can even come close to following New Westminster's model.

(New West has three huge heavy industry hubs, parts of Quensborough, western edge of the city flanking the river and the eastern edge of the city flanking the river and Brunet creek...to top it off they have a casino)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 10:11 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,129
white rock should have a pier casino
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2012, 1:00 AM
tybuilding tybuilding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 898
APEGBC is giving a presentation today about the Surrey City Hall:

http://www.apeg.bc.ca/services/branches/fv.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2012, 7:45 AM
renthefinn's Avatar
renthefinn renthefinn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by skymaster View Post
White Rock will always remain secluded from 'Mainland Surrey' as you call it because of it's geological location. As for Langley and Surrey I'd say that both cities have been one giant suburb for the past 10 years and you can include Delta in there as well.
I think you meant Geographical... they are different geologically in some sense, but not enough to prevent a bridge of development, they are some distance away though... Geographical?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2012, 8:07 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,129
saw some BC news here in Alberta, they want to put a gateway casino in south surrey, they should put it in surrey centre area instead, seems like there is a lot of opposition to it in south surrey
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2012, 5:27 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,128
I don't quite understand the statement White Rock is secluded from mainland Surrey. Remember, White Rock is 3km by 1km in size. It is tiny. 90% of the area in South Surrey people refer to as White Rock isn't White Rock at all.

It's 16 blocks deep only.

So if you mean South Surrey is cut off then I'd argue so are Cloverdale and Clayton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 2:45 PM
theQ theQ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 145
Performing Arts Centre

I was just reading through the "Build Surrey" Capital Project Corporate Report that was presented to council this past week. I was interested to see that the city plans to fund the performing arts centre and the relocation of the North Surrey Arena (page 6) in 2017...

2017 is 5 years away, and if that's when the begin the construction, I'm sure it'll be another couple of years before it's finished, but it's still nice to see a plan in black and white...

Personally, I don't feel that the whole civic centre development will be complete until they build performing arts centre and open up the plaza from City Hall to the Central City tower (which will require moving the arena).'

I'm hoping that Mayor Watts stays around until 2015.

http://www.surrey.ca/bylawsandcouncillibrary/CR_2012-F039.pdf

Last edited by theQ; Dec 1, 2012 at 2:46 PM. Reason: added hyperlink
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2012, 6:00 PM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by theQ View Post
I'm hoping that Mayor Watts stays around until 2015.
This is one of the many reasons I believe we should install her as Empress For Life
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2013, 3:29 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
Well its a new year and new batch of towers I've come across for the central area of surrey

Lets start with a bosa tower
This one was recently in the papers due to them shutting down the church at 104 and university drive. It will be a 31 storey tower for here

sorry best photos I could find





Next I shall show you the second tower to the urban village area
it is a 35 storey tower





























and finally the last one i've found so far
I couldnt make out to much on it but heres some pictures
its location is 103 ave and university drive



I did see some stuff for a few 4 storey apartments around the same area but they arent all to exciting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2013, 6:25 PM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Oh wow. I won't be able to recognize my own home in 10 years as all this gets built up.

Heck, I was walking down University Drive (nee 134th St) and remembering the wooded corner that is now the D'cor and D'corize developments. Man, how this place is going to change...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2013, 2:30 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
I just really hope they don't change the next urban village tower to be more plain like ultra. Its no wave but its still much nicer in my mind.

I do like how there is three towers planned all for just that one area for the next little bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2013, 2:59 AM
Diet Butcher Diet Butcher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 159
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2013, 8:37 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Impressive plans as usual but are these under construction? Seems like Surrey always looks like it's finally gonna be a hot spot right before the economy goes south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2013, 10:03 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
well from what i know the church on 104 and university drive is being shut down. So bosa can start construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2013, 7:44 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Ew, looks worse than the 90's Concord towers.... like a proposal you'd see in Edmonton or Waterloo
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.