HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #941  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2012, 8:40 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Good news. Maybe this will turn the tables on pro sports owners pillaging government. The Oilers won't move because there are too many other teams looking to move.
There are? Name one...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #942  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2012, 8:56 PM
polishavenger polishavenger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
There are? Name one...
I dont follow NHL but isnt Nashville, Florida, NY Islanders, New Jersey, Phoenix, Tampa all in crappy markets?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #943  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2012, 1:09 AM
monocle's Avatar
monocle monocle is offline
cow orker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Keep in mind that Edmonton has a new 2.7 km track just finishing paving out at castrol, if the new barn doesn't make sense
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #944  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2012, 1:55 AM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by polishavenger View Post
I dont follow NHL but isnt Nashville, Florida, NY Islanders, New Jersey, Phoenix, Tampa all in crappy markets?
Crappy market doesn't necessarily mean they are wanting to move.

Nashville has seen a large jump in valuation recently and Calgary's Brett Wilson has joined the ownership group.

Florida, yeah kind of but the team was purchased in 2009 and has sucked for a long time. Things are looking better for them.

The Islanders need a new building badly but moving out of the area makes no sense.

New Jersey is an enigma.

Phoenix is a gong show and as long as the City of Glendale is dumb enough to keep paying for the team or an owner actually comes up with financing the team will stay. They are the most likely to be moved but the NHL is in no rush.

Tampa has had some of the worst ownership groups in the league but as of 2010 have had a really strong ownership that have made some really good moves to better the team and have had some successes with Yzerman as GM.

NHL owners are quite happy to break even or not on NHL hockey if they can make money on other events through owning or operating an arena. The Oilers neither own nor operate Rexall Place. They don't get to deduct any costs for hockey related revenue owed to the league to pay players. Outside of Rexall being a dump, the primary reason for a new building is to deduct as many costs by either owning and/or operating a popular building.

There are a few markets that will soon support NHL hockey but there is no way the NHL board of governors OKs a move of an existing team and gives up a massive expansion fee for Qubec City, Seattle, GTA. As far as I know (outside the Coyotes) there are no teams currently up for sale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #945  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 3:23 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
The Islanders will announce today that they are moving to the Barclay's Center in Brooklyn. Calgary will have the third oldest building by 2015.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #946  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 5:36 PM
Ayreonaut's Avatar
Ayreonaut Ayreonaut is offline
EVDS MPlan Grad
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 11,113
Probably a good move for the Isles, getting closer to the core of the city. Is that where the Nets are now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #947  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 5:46 PM
Innersoul1's Avatar
Innersoul1 Innersoul1 is offline
City of Blinding Lights
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
The Islanders will announce today that they are moving to the Barclay's Center in Brooklyn. Calgary will have the third oldest building by 2015.
The Barclay Centre is a great facility. It seemed like an obvious mover, just needed to be negotiated! I wonder how the whole revenue thing will play out with them moving to "The Bank."
__________________
Sweet dreams are made of cheese. Who am I to diss a brie?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #948  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 5:55 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayreonaut View Post
Probably a good move for the Isles, getting closer to the core of the city. Is that where the Nets are now?
Yes, the Nets are playing there, starting this year. The building is brand new. And the building is right in the core, not merely closer to the core.

Last edited by You Need A Thneed; Oct 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #949  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 8:15 PM
Ayreonaut's Avatar
Ayreonaut Ayreonaut is offline
EVDS MPlan Grad
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 11,113
I think Brooklyn seems to have the most 'local' pride of the boroughs, so hopefully the team is well-supported as 'Brooklyn's team'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #950  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 8:35 PM
Innersoul1's Avatar
Innersoul1 Innersoul1 is offline
City of Blinding Lights
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed View Post
Yes, the Nets are playing there, starting this year. The building is brand new. And the building is right in the core, not merely closer to the core.
It's a great looking building but given that it was not built for hockey the configuration for hockey games is REALLY wonky at one end. Check out the pics on this page:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=159071&page=45
__________________
Sweet dreams are made of cheese. Who am I to diss a brie?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #951  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2012, 8:49 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,138
It's too bad they didn't think of hockey when they designed that place, otherwise great looking building.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #952  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2012, 5:45 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
What's interesting about the Isles is that they're expecting to fit barely 15,000 in for hockey once a few adjustments are made. Which is pretty much the same as Winnipeg's "too small" arena.

I think this really speaks volumes as to the future of the NHL. This is the continent's largest market and their second team is going to play out of the smallest barn in the league, on par with the smallest city in the league. Their 3rd team is basically bankrupt and could move at a moment's notice.

I only hope Calgary doesn't follow this pattern. 15,000 seats here would exclude anyone who doesn't work at Banker's Hall. You'd be talking $100+ for nosebleeds - demand would be insane. It would be worse than Toronto.
__________________
Suburbs are the friends with benefits of the housing world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #953  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2012, 6:00 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
What's interesting about the Isles is that they're expecting to fit barely 15,000 in for hockey once a few adjustments are made. Which is pretty much the same as Winnipeg's "too small" arena.

I think this really speaks volumes as to the future of the NHL. This is the continent's largest market and their second team is going to play out of the smallest barn in the league, on par with the smallest city in the league. Their 3rd team is basically bankrupt and could move at a moment's notice.

I only hope Calgary doesn't follow this pattern. 15,000 seats here would exclude anyone who doesn't work at Banker's Hall. You'd be talking $100+ for nosebleeds - demand would be insane. It would be worse than Toronto.
I think the numbers they have been throwing around are all in the 18000 seat range.

How are site lines in the Bell Centre? they hold around 22 000 and have about the number of boxes Ken King is looking for.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #954  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2012, 7:20 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
I have sat in the super nose bleeds in the Bell Centre. Sure, you are high up, but I had no complaints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #955  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2012, 7:32 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
I think the numbers they have been throwing around are all in the 18000 seat range.

How are site lines in the Bell Centre? they hold around 22 000 and have about the number of boxes Ken King is looking for.
We'll never see another Bell Centre (never say never, but still...).

The reduced seating is less about boxes, and more about the fact that nosebleeds just don't pay for themselves. At least not unless the building lasts 50 years (which is unheard of these days).
__________________
Suburbs are the friends with benefits of the housing world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #956  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2012, 9:12 PM
Joborule Joborule is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 179
Looks like renovating McMahon is the plan for Flames ownership.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/Selling+nam...Stadium/7479587/story.html#ixzz2AwMXVzTP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #957  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2012, 11:04 PM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
Looks like renovating McMahon is the plan for Flames ownership.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/Selling+nam...Stadium/7479587/story.html#ixzz2AwMXVzTP
Only $15m....sounds like more of a bandaid than a long term solution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #958  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2012, 11:11 PM
monocle's Avatar
monocle monocle is offline
cow orker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Article says possibly a $100MM reno eventually, and new stadium "a long shot".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #959  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2012, 11:14 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,138
They say the renos are mostly involving the washrooms and stuff like that. King admits it needs at least $100 million or we need a new stadium, and a new stadium is a long shot.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #960  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2012, 11:29 PM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
Oh didn't see that quote, I should have read it more thoroughly.

Pretty soon Regina and Winnipeg will have brand new top class stadiums; it would be a shame if we here in Canada's wealthiest city could not come up with something at least as nice if not better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.