Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim
And what's amazing is that this is right on track, I remember back in '04 when simple 27 storey condos took forever to go up and were controversial due to their 'outrageous heights'!!
|
It's interesting how attitudes have changed in some cities during the past decade. Back around 2004 I think a lot of people were used to having their neighbourhoods remain more or less static because there had been so little construction since 1990 or so.
I've also noticed, in Halifax at least (and Vancouver's been like this for longer), the quality of new projects has gone up a lot and the public consultation processes have improved. Some of the terrible 1970s-era planning rules have also been eliminated; in a lot of cities pretty much the only things they'd talk about with new buildings were height maximums, density maximums, minimum setbacks, parking minimums, etc. It was all slanted to favour suburban-style development and there was very little emphasis on qualitative aspects of architecture and urban design. It's not surprising that cities with rules like that built a bunch of ugly boxes from about 1970-2000, and those terrible buildings are a big contributing factor to NIMBY sentiment today.