HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5401  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 5:34 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
What office aspect? Because I've been saying for years that there should be an office tower built on the Cal Plaza 3 site (be it Cal Plaza 3 or some other office tower) that would house civic center workers since a lot of the buildings in the Civic Center are outdated.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #5402  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 5:43 PM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
What office aspect? Because I've been saying for years that there should be an office tower built on the Cal Plaza 3 site (be it Cal Plaza 3 or some other office tower) that would house civic center workers since a lot of the buildings in the Civic Center are outdated.

There was some deal- I forget the specifics exactly, that a federal office building of 400,000 feet would be built along with the courthouse, and the current, 1930s courthouse would be renovated into creative office space.
     
     
  #5403  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 6:11 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
There was some deal- I forget the specifics exactly, that a federal office building of 400,000 feet would be built along with the courthouse, and the current, 1930s courthouse would be renovated into creative office space.
That's interesting. The office building was supposed to be on the same lot as the courthouse, but there doesn't appear to be any room set aside for it. Maybe they're opting for a different location.

Honestly though, I'm not a big believer in the property trade-off proposed in the deal. I'm not sure why any developer would want to pay $50 million out of the pocket, just so they can spend even more renovating an 80 year old courthouse.
     
     
  #5404  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 6:16 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,288
^ Agreed. I think that deal is pie in the sky and dead on arrival, to cram two cliches into the same sentence.

The structure of the deal - proposed by the City Council, if I remember correctly - was to place the 400,000 sq. of office space, built by a private developer, on the same block as the courthouse, to be leased out to the City and/or County. In exchange, the developer would get a somewhat sweetheart deal on the current County Courthouse, which may require $250 million in seismic upgrades to get a certificate of occupancy again. Many experts came out and said that that deal is likely not feasible.

As for why this design doesn't take that office requirement into account is likely because this design was commissioned and completed prior to City Council dreaming up that office swap deal.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #5405  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 7:06 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
What an eventful 7 days it's been, right?
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #5406  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 1:29 AM
112597jorge 112597jorge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
Illithid Dude, no one knows what the winning bid is just yet. At least none of us in the general public. Did anyone else notice that they added a shortened Cal Plaza 3 to their render below? As that takes actual effort to produce this, I wonder if this is an error, or if they know something we don't. Frankly, I'd be shocked if it were the latter. I can see not wanting to draw the Broad in there, as that would be a pain in the ass, but adding a building that's not there? That just seems weird to me.
that might also be the Zen Tower.
     
     
  #5407  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 1:34 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by 112597jorge View Post
that might also be the Zen Tower.
No, it's definitely Cal Plaza 3. Same shape as 1 and 2, and Zen Tower is on the other side of the street.
     
     
  #5408  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 6:14 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,288
Zen Tower was proposed for the NE corner of 3rd and Hill. The tower in question is located at the NE corner of 4th and Olive, where Cal Plaza 3 was proposed, and Angels Knoll currently sits.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #5409  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 9:14 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
The base of Apex is no longer terra cotta. It's now a soft cream color. Much more classy looking.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hunterkerhart/8045436634/sizes/l/in/photostream/
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #5410  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 9:41 AM
Kingofthehill's Avatar
Kingofthehill Kingofthehill is offline
International
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,046
I am not sure what to think of that "Dallas white" color. The orange base gave it some edge and character.
     
     
  #5411  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 2:37 PM
RuFFy's Avatar
RuFFy RuFFy is offline
FlyyyFALiiFe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 364
IMO the Orange base was too dark. It made it appear a little dank. While I'm also not sure what to think of the lighter color, it highlights the base of the building more than the Orange did. It seems to have a greater presence with the lighter color.
     
     
  #5412  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 2:47 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,288
I too preferred the orange, but can live with the off white. Now, if only they would build the second tower...
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #5413  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 3:10 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
^ Right. I'm much more interested in whether or not the second tower gets built as opposed to the color of the base.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #5414  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 4:46 PM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
^ Right. I'm much more interested in whether or not the second tower gets built as opposed to the color of the base.
Absolutely. Supposedly theres a good chance it will be built..
     
     
  #5415  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 4:53 PM
ziggy331's Avatar
ziggy331 ziggy331 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Downtown LA
Posts: 144


In other news, looks like Pure Juicery is out at 7th/Metro, Wetzels is in.
     
     
  #5416  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 7:03 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
I know there is no actual food in them but a Cheese Pretzel Dog is a perfect subway meal.

__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #5417  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 9:27 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
Wokers on the 8th and Hope site today. Looks like they're just marking stuff off.
     
     
  #5418  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 10:40 PM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,454
Damn I've been meaning to try that juice place too.

O well, Wetzels deliciousness it is. I hope they do well.
     
     
  #5419  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 11:09 PM
RST500 RST500 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
Zen Tower was proposed for the NE corner of 3rd and Hill. The tower in question is located at the NE corner of 4th and Olive, where Cal Plaza 3 was proposed, and Angels Knoll currently sits.
Was the Zen canceled and if so what is the status on that lot?
     
     
  #5420  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2012, 11:38 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Zen hasn't made a peep in years one way or another so who knows really?
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.