HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7341  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2012, 7:02 PM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,669
Has anyone been to Ruocco Park? How is it. So the County Admin Building Park is finally starting... What about construction to revamp the waterfront? Am I wrong in assuming that it has officially "started"?
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
     
     
  #7342  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2012, 9:16 PM
kpexpress's Avatar
kpexpress kpexpress is offline
In urbansim we trust
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
Has anyone been to Ruocco Park? How is it. So the County Admin Building Park is finally starting... What about construction to revamp the waterfront? Am I wrong in assuming that it has officially "started"?
I'm going to the park right now actually!
     
     
  #7343  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2012, 9:23 PM
kpexpress's Avatar
kpexpress kpexpress is offline
In urbansim we trust
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 782
http://www.ccdc.com/images/stories/downloads/ccac/Basic_Concept_Drawings_web.pdf

Quite possibly the worst project ever proposed in Downtown San Diego! 700+ units!
     
     
  #7344  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2012, 11:04 PM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,384
What's wrong with it?
__________________
Portlandia
     
     
  #7345  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2012, 11:27 PM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,749
NFL in LA

Just saw on today on nbc's football night in America that LA city council voted 9-0 in favor of a 75,000 seat football stadium in LA. Front runners being SD, Oakland, St. Louis. Construction could start in 2013, completion by 2016 season.
     
     
  #7346  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 12:15 AM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Looks like the city has a year or two to make the stadium deal happen. Hopefully enough of the old codgers fighting this will have retired and left the city by then...finally letting go of their illusions of selling their homes at bubble prices.

Last edited by spoonman; Oct 1, 2012 at 1:09 AM.
     
     
  #7347  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 1:08 AM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Are any of you following the feasibility study of a streetcar line to the zoo? The line is proposed to extend from Smart Corner to Zoo Dr. I'm curious why the line doesn't continue to University and Park. That isn't too much farther, and would add serious ridership. Maybe that will happen as a next step?
     
     
  #7348  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 1:35 AM
bushman61988's Avatar
bushman61988 bushman61988 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: National City
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpexpress View Post
http://www.ccdc.com/images/stories/downloads/ccac/Basic_Concept_Drawings_web.pdf

Quite possibly the worst project ever proposed in Downtown San Diego! 700+ units!
Really? Worst project ever? I think the Hilton Bayfront looks worse... at least this one almost "hidden" between two huge towers. And I think it's great that it has 700 units, the more, the better I think.

That said, it's a boring project and I can't stand the piece of exposed concrete... it's so ugly and lazy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
Are any of you following the feasibility study of a streetcar line to the zoo? The line is proposed to extend from Smart Corner to Zoo Dr. I'm curious why the line doesn't continue to University and Park. That isn't too much farther, and would add serious ridership. Maybe that will happen as a next step?

No, I haven't heard about this lately? Where are they discussing this?
     
     
  #7349  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 2:14 AM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo the Dog View Post
Just saw on today on nbc's football night in America that LA city council voted 9-0 in favor of a 75,000 seat football stadium in LA. Front runners being SD, Oakland, St. Louis. Construction could start in 2013, completion by 2016 season.
This is a non story Leo. Of course the City Council was going to approve it. They weren't approving any public money. Whoever buys AEG has to pay Anschutz, spend 1.5 to 2 billion to demolish the convention center and build the stadium. Buy 40 to 50% of an NFL team and possibly pay a relocation fee or some other kind of franchise fee. So this is far from a done deal and we don't even know if AEG is going to sell maybe no one will be willing to meet Anschutz's asking price.

Mark Davis is going to sell his share in the Raiders, the Davis family has all of its wealth tied up in the franchise they own. Show me one other owner of a pro sports team in the same situation? There is none because they all were rich from some other business interest before they bought a team. The Davis family will only be mega wealthy once they sell their only asset (the Raiders).
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
     
     
  #7350  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 3:27 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpexpress View Post
http://www.ccdc.com/images/stories/downloads/ccac/Basic_Concept_Drawings_web.pdf

Quite possibly the worst project ever proposed in Downtown San Diego! 700+ units!
Ugly yea but not worst.

Too bulky
     
     
  #7351  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 5:13 AM
eburress's Avatar
eburress eburress is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneHugo View Post
Ugly yea but not worst.

Too bulky
Not the ugliest either. That's Vantage Point.
     
     
  #7352  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2012, 6:32 AM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,151
Not in love with Blue Sky (prefer it to Mondrian, however). Im in conflict over it though.

I do want as many units downtown as possible. How those two towers end up equaling 700+ units, I have no idea.

I don't mind the shorter height, whatever gets built there is going to be over-shadowed by symphony and vantage anyways.

It is boring, not La Vita status though.

I would approve it, I just don't see it as terrible enough for a no. For that locale anyways. If this was on the bayfront, I'd scream a bit.
     
     
  #7353  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 1:02 AM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
This is a non story Leo. Of course the City Council was going to approve it. They weren't approving any public money. Whoever buys AEG has to pay Anschutz, spend 1.5 to 2 billion to demolish the convention center and build the stadium. Buy 40 to 50% of an NFL team and possibly pay a relocation fee or some other kind of franchise fee. So this is far from a done deal and we don't even know if AEG is going to sell maybe no one will be willing to meet Anschutz's asking price.

Mark Davis is going to sell his share in the Raiders, the Davis family has all of its wealth tied up in the franchise they own. Show me one other owner of a pro sports team in the same situation? There is none because they all were rich from some other business interest before they bought a team. The Davis family will only be mega wealthy once they sell their only asset (the Raiders).
Agree with everything. LA is making progress though and won't be without a team for much longer. Hopefully it's the Raiders. I hate their fans....they'd fit in perfect if they move back to LA.
     
     
  #7354  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 5:44 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,012
     
     
  #7355  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 5:46 AM
eburress's Avatar
eburress eburress is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo the Dog View Post
Agree with everything. LA is making progress though and won't be without a team for much longer. Hopefully it's the Raiders. I hate their fans....they'd fit in perfect if they move back to LA.
I too hope that is what happens. It almost seems to me with LA in his back pocket, Spanos doesn't have to try very hard...spend very much. With LA off the table, it's as if he would have no excuse but to commit to San Diego.
     
     
  #7356  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 5:52 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,384
Can you imagine the Chargers and the Raiders sharing the same stadium?








__________________
Portlandia
     
     
  #7357  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2012, 6:26 AM
kpexpress's Avatar
kpexpress kpexpress is offline
In urbansim we trust
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by eburress View Post
Not the ugliest either. That's Vantage Point.
At least Vantage Pointe doesn't have 4 levels of exposed parking screened by a green wall, that won't be kept up and will die off, that's anchored by a shitty shimmering wall that they stole from the Sparkles van.

This is the worst project proposed in downtown on the books currently. You guys need to look more into the ground level... or lack thereof.
     
     
  #7358  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2012, 5:25 AM
Lipani Lipani is offline
It could be worse!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Lane Field hotels approved by port
First phase could open by early 2015
Written by Roger Showley

Lane Field, once home to the minor league Padres at the downtown water’s edge, could welcome hotels by early 2015 following final approval Tuesday by the San Diego Unified Port District.

The project at the northeast corner of Broadway and Harbor Drive now goes to the California Coastal Commission, possibly next month but more likely early next year.

Port commissioners praised the design as an improvement over the “cereal box” look first seen in July but agreed with nearby condo tower residents that underground parking would be preferred.

The site, where the Padres played from 1936 to 1957, has been a parking lot for more than 50 years as the port awaited a landmark development for this key gateway spot on the North Embarcadero.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/oct/09/lane-field-hotels-approved-port/
     
     
  #7359  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2012, 6:06 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,012
Well it doesn't look THAT bad I guess...
     
     
  #7360  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2012, 6:17 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is online now
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneHugo View Post
Well it doesn't look THAT bad I guess...
I think it will look a lot better when built.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:39 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.