Quote:
Originally Posted by Old&New
The theater would also be on the Kearns property. The stage of the theater would sit where the Kearns parking garage is currently located, and the auditorium would fit North of that (see below). The Kearns parking would be replaced many times over by an underground parking garage below the tower and theater lobby.
As for the halt on the funding, have your city-council-contact talk to the chair of the city council (Soren Simonsen).
Click for large view
http://www.utahurbanforum.com/utah-performance-center-on-main-street-t25-30.html#p2885
The vision for Regent Street could also apply to 100 South in the case of a 100 south theater location. For example, if wicked came into town again, the Salt Palace could be lit up with green lights, and banners along 100 south could promote whatever show was playing. All the people passing on TRAX would see it too.
|
I've always been in favor of developing on the Southwest corner, but I don't think burying the UPAC in the middle of the block with no major street frontage is a good idea at all. So, again, I go back to my idea of having the office tower straddling/partially sitting on top of the UPAC. Any decent architecture firm that is known for their iconic buildings (SOM, Moshe Safdie, etc.), should be able to find a good solution for something like that. From that, we get both the UPAC and the office tower with prime street frontage; a taller tower; and a parking lot on a prime spot of real estate in downtown gets filled in; and we don't have to demolish any buildings. That is a win, win, win, win situation.
Why don't we contact the council members or contact the SL Tribune for an editorial post to start getting opposition to building on the propose location?!