HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7301  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2012, 5:22 AM
kpexpress's Avatar
kpexpress kpexpress is offline
In urbansim we trust
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 782


16th and G st
     
     
  #7302  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2012, 5:37 AM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,669
^^^ Das whats up. No details just a fatty rendering huh K? I'm so down with verticality in the East Village. Where else are struggling youths going to live. They have to get out of their parents house sometime. I say pack them in to micro apartments in 30 floor plus towers! It would be like living in the dorms all over again.
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
     
     
  #7303  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2012, 5:56 AM
Chapelo's Avatar
Chapelo Chapelo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 324
La Jolla Commons Tower II is proceeding at breakneck speed. Looks like we'll be at street level soon, some of the rebar columns are already poking up.


http://www.earthcam.com/client/hines/
__________________
We spread out and occupy the cracks in the urban streets.
     
     
  #7304  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2012, 6:19 AM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,151
16th and G looks decent. I would live there.

And screw La Jolla Commons, I have no patience for that down-sized box project.
     
     
  #7305  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2012, 5:28 PM
eburress's Avatar
eburress eburress is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDfan View Post
16th and G looks decent. I would live there.

And screw La Jolla Commons, I have no patience for that down-sized box project.
I'm kinda with you on this. This project was cheapened in every possible way. Cheap design, cheap materials. I shouldn't be surprised given where the project is located (Miramar adjacent) and the state of the local economy, but I blame them for raising our expectations with (seemingly) well-designed, soaring towers, Mandarin Oriental hotels, etc.
     
     
  #7306  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 12:03 AM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpexpress View Post


16th and G st
Is this in lieu of the 38 story building that is/was slated to go at 16th & G?
     
     
  #7307  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 12:56 AM
kpexpress's Avatar
kpexpress kpexpress is offline
In urbansim we trust
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
Is this in lieu of the 38 story building that is/was slated to go at 16th & G?
I guess. I wasn't sure of what was previously proposed for this site. This is an AVRP designed and owned project.
     
     
  #7308  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 3:19 AM
OneMetropolis's Avatar
OneMetropolis OneMetropolis is offline
99.9%-Urban .1%-Me
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 339
New MTS map and trolley routes

I personally love the new changes to the mts, less wait time in downtown, (which was always hell) easier to go to my classes at Mesa now thank goodness.


__________________
Where you wished you were "SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA"

FINAL FANTASY XIII-2 "Don't play with Lightning"
     
     
  #7309  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 8:43 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpexpress View Post
I guess. I wasn't sure of what was previously proposed for this site. This is an AVRP designed and owned project.
Ugh what a downgrade.

     
     
  #7310  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 4:07 PM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,385
Oh man, that's sad. I like that current design, but a tall sleek tower would've been so much better in that location.
__________________
Portlandia
     
     
  #7311  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 9:20 PM
mongoXZ's Avatar
mongoXZ mongoXZ is offline
Pipe Layer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 316
I don't mind the new design, bright rainbow colors and all. The original one looked to be more of a filler until they made a more detailed design anyways.
     
     
  #7312  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 10:19 PM
staplesla staplesla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 326
Condo, office tower plans OK'd for Santa Fe Depot

Bosa, Irvine plans call for three projects on balance of 17-acre site

Two condo towers and a high-rise office building downtown worth $649 million received new endorsements Wednesday as Civic San Diego kept alive a 30-year-old development agreement for the Santa Fe Depot property.

Under the 10-year plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission Thursday and the City Council next month, Bosa Development plans a 41-story, 232-unit tower, estimated at $149 million, at the southeast corner of Pacific Highway and Broadway and a 36-story, 285-unit tower, estimated at $200 million, at the southwest corner of Kettner Boulevard and Ash Street....

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/04/new-condo-office-tower-agreement-okd-santa-fe-depo/

     
     
  #7313  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 11:03 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,955
Bosa to the rescue again.
     
     
  #7314  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 6:01 AM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,669
Buck Yeah! I heart Nat Bosa. Kind weird how the 36 floor tower has more units. Lets do dis.
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
     
     
  #7315  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 7:54 PM
TGBinSD's Avatar
TGBinSD TGBinSD is offline
Time to musk up
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: A whale's vagina
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by staplesla View Post
Bosa, Irvine plans call for three projects on balance of 17-acre site

Two condo towers and a high-rise office building downtown worth $649 million received new endorsements Wednesday as Civic San Diego kept alive a 30-year-old development agreement for the Santa Fe Depot property.

Under the 10-year plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission Thursday and the City Council next month, Bosa Development plans a 41-story, 232-unit tower, estimated at $149 million, at the southeast corner of Pacific Highway and Broadway and a 36-story, 285-unit tower, estimated at $200 million, at the southwest corner of Kettner Boulevard and Ash Street....

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/04/new-condo-office-tower-agreement-okd-santa-fe-depo/

hell yes! great looking towers
     
     
  #7316  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 8:30 PM
mongoXZ's Avatar
mongoXZ mongoXZ is offline
Pipe Layer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 316
So Ariel Suites (already under construction), 2 BOSA projects, Lane Field, and the Irvine company Tower should be rising up in the Columbia District soon!
     
     
  #7317  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2012, 2:12 AM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
How bout those Chargers...bump
     
     
  #7318  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2012, 6:11 AM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,151
What about them? They're going to move to LA in a few years. If we're lucky, maybe they'll call them the "Southern California Chargers" and save us some of the embarrassment of losing an NFL team (not that we have obligation or the means to build them a new stadium).

Aside from that, the Bosa projects are nice. Just aesthetically of course. They won't do much in terms of making Pacific Highway, or the Columbia District any more active (how many snowbirds and retirees are going to be buying second homes this time?...) but at least they're pretty.

I want 11th and Broadway, 9th and Broadway, and to 15th and Island to start moving! Those are going to be crucial to expanding our city's activity downtown.
     
     
  #7319  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 1:26 AM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDfan View Post
What about them? They're going to move to LA in a few years. If we're lucky, maybe they'll call them the "Southern California Chargers" and save us some of the embarrassment of losing an NFL team (not that we have obligation or the means to build them a new stadium).

Aside from that, the Bosa projects are nice. Just aesthetically of course. They won't do much in terms of making Pacific Highway, or the Columbia District any more active (how many snowbirds and retirees are going to be buying second homes this time?...) but at least they're pretty.

I want 11th and Broadway, 9th and Broadway, and to 15th and Island to start moving! Those are going to be crucial to expanding our city's activity downtown.
The Chargers won't move to LA. This is just posturing to get a new stadium. Every city that has needed a new stadium has used the same LA crutch. The reason I know it will never happen is because LA has always hated the Chargers because they are former rivals. LA fans would rather root for UCLA and USC. Not going to happen.

I do agree with you though that there is plenty to be down about in this city.
     
     
  #7320  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 1:31 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,385
I don't think they're going anywhere either. What happened to all the hype around a stadium in LA? Oh yeah, it died.
__________________
Portlandia
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.