HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2012, 1:10 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,388
Nice.
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2012, 4:18 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
That's good to hear, hopefully this will help stimulate some major development in that area. There are too many parking lots and underdeveloped lots in that area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2012, 5:17 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
This is good news, I think. Although I doubt we will actually see that many towers, the view, especially of downtown, is potentially one of the Lloyd District's biggest assets for residential.

That is an awesome map! I actually like how they lowered the max height on Broadway - keeping it a buffer between wealthy Irvington and the commercial area to the south, perhaps it will also help preserve it as a commercial street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 8:29 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Metro chooses Hyatt for OCC Headquarters Hotel


Last edited by PacificNW; Sep 5, 2012 at 4:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2012, 10:43 PM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,388
2015 eh?
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 7:23 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacificNW View Post
I'm guessing that's just a schematic design, not how the hotel would actually look. The detailing wouldn't be done until they decide whether they want a single hotel or two, and then settle on a site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 12:42 PM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
what would be the advantage (to the company) of two separate hotels?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 1:32 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by bvpcvm View Post
what would be the advantage (to the company) of two separate hotels?
Easier to shut down one building when it isn't needed? I use to work for a hotel that would shut down entire wings when the travel season was slow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 3:17 PM
pbd pbd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 20
Also the hotels may be at different price points. So a portion of the rooms are really high end and a portion is less expensive and under a different name. Like half Marriot half Courtyard by Marriot for example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 4:50 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
If they decide to split it into two hotels, not a bad idea IMO, as it does give different price points and can attract more groups, I hope they incorporate it into one building like Williams & Dame are doing with their Courtyard/Residence Inn in LA.

http://wddcorp.com/projects/index.php?neighborhood=south-park&project=26
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 5:28 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
I agree, one building would be better than two. I imagine they'd be sharing facilities anyway... conference rooms, kitchens, maintenance, etc. Maybe have two separate lobbies, if that's how they want to market it, but keep all the rooms stacked in one tower. It's just as easy (if not easier) to shut down individual floors in the off-season as it is to shut down an entire building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 6:27 PM
Sioux612's Avatar
Sioux612 Sioux612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 541
Such a huge disappointment, especially when you consider the Weston design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 7:33 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,109
The people on oregonlive are not happy.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 7:44 PM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
The people on oregonlive are not happy.
They never are.
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2012, 8:32 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,603
edit: Actually, I think I'm more interested in discussing the architecture than what the idiots who reside on Oregonlive all day every day have to say.

Those renderings, however preliminary, are pretty mediocre but not surprising. I'm guessing the team wanted to play it as "safe" as possible, i.e. make it look affordable to Metro and not make any waves among the local media or populace, neither of which are particularly sophisticated when it comes to architecture. It has that boxy, quasi-traditional thing going on that we ("we") seem to love.

I do think it is interesting that they seem more focused on the blocks north of the CC. I wonder what the background is on that; does it matter at all that Metro just spent several million dollars developing that plaza to the east? I think that project turned out pretty nice -- if the hotel were to catalyze the blocks between MLK and Grand north of 84 in such a way that that plaza became more of an urban space surrounded by mixed-use, that would be awesome.

It would be nice to see 100 Multnomah back on the table, too. That whole area from the mall to the river is such a clusterf***...hope I live to see the day when it's been transformed back into some semblance of urban fabric...

Last edited by tworivers; Sep 6, 2012 at 12:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 12:20 AM
PDX City-State PDX City-State is offline
Well designed mixed use
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: under the Burnside Bridge
Posts: 1,589
The Westin design didn't include any meeting space or amenities--so really wasn't a true convention center hotel.

I would love to see a nice building, but that's secondary to doing something that starts bringing some dollars to this area. Not putting the convention center downtown was one of the worst mistakes the city every made. Having something there that adds the number of rooms needed--and the other amenities will help tremendously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 12:39 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX City-State
The Westin design didn't include any meeting space or amenities--so really wasn't a true convention center hotel.

I would love to see a nice building, but that's secondary to doing something that starts bringing some dollars to this area. Not putting the convention center downtown was one of the worst mistakes the city every made. Having something there that adds the number of rooms needed--and the other amenities will help tremendously.
Actually the Westin proposal had 36,000sq ft of meeting space + another 22,000sq ft in prefunction. It was an ideal complementary hotel to the OCC.

http://library.oregonmetro.gov/files/hvs_study.pdf

If the OCC was downtown it would kill blocks and blocks of street life. Can you imagine the 19 loading bays fronting a downtown street?

Being up against the freeway, next to MAX, now streetcar, and a quickly growing Lloyd District, it's in the perfect spot. The views of downtown from the upper floors are spectacular! The growing district will transform the experience for people coming to a convention.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 12:45 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,388
Yeah, having OCC downtown would be a disaster (where the hell would they even put it?). It's location now is perfect, that area just needs to be built up a bit.
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 1:36 AM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
There were a number of proposals for the convention center. A couple would have placed the center downtown but the Lloyd District location won out...

Last edited by PacificNW; Sep 6, 2012 at 5:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2012, 5:17 AM
Mr. Walch Mr. Walch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 120
Even with the bland design I am still excited. The Lloyd District's ship may finally be coming in. 600 new hotel rooms. 200 new apartments on the same block and 60 more to the west. 780 and a whole lot of new retail a few blocks to the east. 100 or so more along broadway to the north. That sound like the critical mass needed to get a lot of other property owners off the side lines and into the game. Who knows, maybe some day the full block Burger King might go away. Like some one mentioned before, Llody could be the new Pearl. I only wonder if Portland has the demand to support major development in Lloyd, Conway, SoWa, North Pearl and the post office site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.