Quote:
Originally Posted by dpenner
good point forgot to mention that, i wonder if the lots across from the CMHR (parcel 3 was it called?) will be zoned with height restrictions if there is ever development on them
|
I think that Parcel 4 and others are ones that should not have height restrictions. What they should have is restrictions enabling only well thought out multi-purpose developments.
There is nothing that these parcels would be blocking if they were built as high rises. Unless one would use the argument that it is blocking the rest of the skyline, but it really doesn't take a genius to see the flaw in that argument.
I agree, waterfront is beautiful because of the restrictions in place. The beauty in this case comes from the restrictions. However, while walking around after many heated debates with other forum members concerning modern architecture and high rises within the Exchange, I have come to the conclusion that I wouldn't mind a well planned building within the exchange (high-rise or not). This is as long as the proper time is taken to make sure it fits with the niche of the surrounding area. However the Waterfront should be saved for the archetype which has already been established; mid-rise condo's overlooking the river.
On a side note, I am excited to point out that for the first time I have recieved "Top Comment" status on WFP's website!