Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote
It is funny no one in the city ever thinks about the Rail yards in another way.
Look at it like this, we all know you are not going to get a high tax base from it due to the fact poverty in its extreme is on both sides. Making Natives equal??? Hell they get more free bee's then anyone else. For that part I would suggest NO MORE NATIVE STATUS, you are a Canadian and you will be part of society and work just like every other culture does and not live off making babies and welfare. Simple. The days of past when these reserves were made and all this are gone, when a country goes to war and takes over the other, they don't give handouts to the loser. Sorry if that is harsh, but thats life and there is not one living Native person around that lived in those times. It is time to move on. Then people in general would respect Natives a lot more, but by feeding them handouts you will never get respect. And in the end you will get poverty.
Now getting past that, you have an two underpasses on the yards, and two bridges, 3 if you count the sorta freeway. Now people always complain about getting from one end of the city to the other. Take a close look on a map all the way from transcona to centerport, you will see a nice clear path for a actual freeway right across the city, and best of all, the over passes and underpasses are in place. If you bring this into the picture you have a lot of traffic flowing across the entire city ( I would connect it to center port and eventually to Hwy1 via Dugald Rd. Now Housing infill people say, WHY? Why can it not be ligth industrial? This would solve the above part of the poverty equation, you would bring jobs into and area that is now, well just box cars and such. Sure put in some Small apt blocks as large ones in poor neighborhoods tend to get infested fast with the wrong people. And no more Welfare Infill, I have no problem with a Habitat style way of building, that also makes the poor part of the people and city want to keep their homes, or condos clean and neat as they have to pay for them. But when you hand something for free , you can look at your own kids, and see they really do not respect or appreciate it for long.
Also in this mix would be a nice Rapid transit system, right from the Airport and to Transcona ( big dream I know ) Also a lot of green space as green space is a key to a happy neighborhood, Playgrounds for kids etc.
The city needs to think out of the box, not think grand schemes and think what works best. And what most other cities do when they have land stretching across the entire city..
Just my thoughts on this.
|
Setting aside the inconsistencies, internal contradictions, and incoherence of this post (the railyard should be turned into a freeway, from Transcona, with light industry and apartments for the right kind of people and parks - you know, for the kids - is that right?) and leaving the breathtakingly poor comprehension of local history for someone with far more patience than myself to sort out, do you really think the phrase is "free bee's"? Like - bees at no charge?
What's the etymology of this slang for you? Back in the olden days, pioneer bee keepers would unfairly offer some bees to some folks for free and others at a cost? Is the crux of the complaint that these bees were treated as hand outs yet simultaneously not used to their full potential? Is honey quality part of the consideration? Bees. Of course.
If the railyard could be moved, if CPR was interested, motivated, if the capital was there to support vision, this would be quite the opportunity, or multiple opportunities: a few hundred acres of undeveloped space minutes away from downtown to build into virtually any kind of new community? Urbanists should be all over this.
Nice column TV, especially the way you captured the low density v. high tax burden death cycle we're on. Cool that the Free Press is taking this up. Weird that it's not getting much attention here. Is it just too far in the future? Is there just too much other stuff going on?