HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


80 South Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2012, 7:42 AM
lakegz's Avatar
lakegz lakegz is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,713
Here's what Robert W posted on ssc about this.






If you can make out the small writing, you will see that the height measurement that almost goes to the very top says 845 feet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2012, 11:18 AM
DesignerVoodoo's Avatar
DesignerVoodoo DesignerVoodoo is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 126
Go to Morali Architects page on Facebook, they have more drawings posted and keep updating them as the design process unfolds.
https://www.facebook.com/MoraliArchitects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2012, 11:46 AM
401PAS's Avatar
401PAS 401PAS is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakegz View Post
Here's what Robert W posted on ssc about this.






If you can make out the small writing, you will see that the height measurement that almost goes to the very top says 845 feet
This reminds me of 1 Madison Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2012, 12:30 PM
DesignerVoodoo's Avatar
DesignerVoodoo DesignerVoodoo is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 126
I took this from the Morali Facebook page.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by DesignerVoodoo; Jul 25, 2012 at 12:31 PM. Reason: I forgot to credit the source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2012, 11:31 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
That would make quite an impact . . . essentially Beekman Place right up against the East River (speaking in terms of height).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2012, 2:19 AM
sbarn sbarn is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,075
New renderings, more detailed renderings have been released for this one. I wonder how much this one is a reality. There hasn't been much news other than these images from the architect's website.




Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2012, 12:55 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbarn View Post
...I wonder how much this one is a reality...
I'm also having a hard time figuring out if this is a real proposal or a just vision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2012, 3:28 PM
Wheelingman04's Avatar
Wheelingman04 Wheelingman04 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,800
I hope it doesn't get built. I think it's ugly and would totally ruin the wonderful view from Brooklyn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2012, 8:11 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 35,026
This proposal is actually 904 ft. to top, according to the architect's website.

The original proposal was different, and was the 780 ft. figure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2012, 11:48 AM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,117
Hope they take this baby over 1,000 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2012, 2:14 PM
SD_Phil's Avatar
SD_Phil SD_Phil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,704
Reminds me, vaguely, of the Calatrava design:

Image Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2012, 9:48 PM
jd3189's Avatar
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,894
They're giving Calatrava a homage no doubt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 12:32 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,289
There's certainly a nod to the Calatrava design, but it's far inferior. The more I look at it, the more closely it resembles The Saya (One Madison Park) in midtown. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's just not nearly as good as it could have been with the Calatrava design. And in a city like NY, with as prominent a location as this, it's even more disappointing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 12:48 AM
NYC GUY's Avatar
NYC GUY NYC GUY is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 575
Not sure what looked so great about Calatrava's design that was ugly looking. The new one looks okay not great but okay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 12:53 AM
-Filipe-'s Avatar
-Filipe- -Filipe- is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 274
i think the new design is better then the old one, maybe in person it will look better..doubt it, but lets be honest, their both —, especially the old design belongs no where in this country maybe in asia or something i hate them both
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 1:49 AM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,175
they should add a 100 foot spire...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 2:10 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
they should add a 100 foot spire...
lol! spire, mast or antenna?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2012, 12:52 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
The design has only gotten better, and that's a good thing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by yankeesfan1000 View Post
I'm also having a hard time figuring out if this is a real proposal or a just vision.
I would say its no more vision than 80 South Street was.


Quote:
Cord Meyer Development is the owner of the property and currently working out the specifics of air rights it has purchased over the years, and whether one half (150K square feet) of residential building will be allowed. Morali Architects has been posting renderings on its Facebook page along with notes on a planned mixed-use tower for the address.
Sounds like it may or may not be as of right. If a special permit is need for the site, it would have to go through the approvals process. But since the tower is still in the planning stages, its too early to say. They could decide to go in an entirely different direction.



There's not as much difference in these two designs visually as you might initially think...










Comparison with another planned tower of similar height (56 Leonard)


Last edited by NYguy; Aug 18, 2012 at 1:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2012, 1:12 PM
DURKEY427 DURKEY427 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 212
i prefer the new 80 south street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2012, 3:19 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by DURKEY427 View Post
i prefer the new 80 south street.
Must have been crazy to think there was actual news
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:48 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.