Quote:
Originally Posted by kwajo
I don't know if that's strictly true, as there is a lot of new/renovated residential in Uptown Saint John, taking advantage of existing infrastructure.
|
Actually, strictly, not true.
In my humility, I will acknowledge the recent residential proposals, including the one completed building beside the cruise ship terminal (though I will criticise tenant affordability) -- but I will disagree with you of it being "a lot;" in fact, it will take more than a handful of downtown developments to begin curbing the city's debt incurred from sprawled infrastructure in the past, as well as the current suburbia still going up in Saint John's proximal, unamalgamated communities. It will be some time still before Saint John sees a return on the cost of maintaining the uptown's infrastructure.
It is also about bringing in jobs to this urban centre for these assumed would-be residents.
I agree with you in the sense that this is a good first step. If the province permits it, the city can work toward bringing its urban development into the majority. Suburban development, though I don't advocate for it, doesn't have to be halted completely.
And I surely hope it is not at all necessary for Moncton to economically hit 'rock bottom' before it finally begins building inward and upward. I am wondering how strong a kick in the stomach it'll be to the city when Moncton High is relocated and the downtown sees a sharp drop in population, and its associated spending within downtown businesses.
Having a downtown school is such a powerful asset for bringing in more residential, which in turn will attract more businesses and jobs, collectively raise more tax revenue via density, and in turn will be more easily justifiable to spend money on park and landscaping renovations to make the entire space more livable -- to attract even more residential...