Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74
Unless you think people on this board are retarded or can't read, there is nothing in my post here which is a lie.
|
Considering Panama City has 17 200 meter towers BUILT, that right there is "a lie", although can be forgiven because you forgot to include buildings w/out drawings in your diagram search.
The rest of it, such as 33-15, is very disingenuous, because you are basically implying that Toronto is currently twice the size of Panama City. It makes sense to hear that you are in advertising. While you aren't necessarily telling boldfaced lies (except the one I just pointed out in the preceding paragraph), you frame your information to cause the average person who reads it to believe in falsehoods. I guess "I'm sorry" that I went ahead and did some research behind your statistics.
Say what you want, but the numbers actually say that not only CAN Panama touch Toronto, it's actually CURRENTLY ahead of it.
http://homepages.ipact.nl/~egram/skylines.html
Maybe not in a few years, but the crux of my original argument has been that some posters (cough, Caltrane) are portraying Toronto to be CURRENTLY bigger than it is. In this case, 16 of your 33 are proposals, and 5 more have not CURRENTLY hit the 200 meter mark. I have no problem with you saying that it WILL be much better, but I do have a problem when you assert that it already is.