HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1441  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 11:09 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallBob View Post
Not including New York city, Toronto's second to none in U/C or proposed high-rises! (In NA) Chicago is starting to get a bunch of new proposals lined up but there a couples years out yet.
Including New York, we're second to none in U/C or proposed high-rises in North America.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1442  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 11:28 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
Well under-construction i know we are killing it. Didnt know we have more proposals than New York.

Thats a cool fact.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1443  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 11:53 AM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
But not nearly as tall..
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1444  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 1:20 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
True enough, but the context was under construction and proposed developments. - I hesitated at first when responding, given that New York was constructing more massive developments than Toronto at the very top end, so felt that was enough to give them the pass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1445  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 6:54 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 10,950
Why isn't Toronto constructing more massive developments?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1446  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 7:03 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
We don't have the demand/capacity for the type of Office Towers being constructed at World Trade Center?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1447  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 8:50 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 10,950
Is that a question or a statement?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1448  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 8:59 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
We don't have the demand/capacity for the type of Office Towers being constructed at World Trade Center?
Not as such. But a number of companies are consolidating their numerous offices around the GTA into one building, so it wouldn't surprise me if, in the next five years or so there will be demand for a supertall office complex for one or two companies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1449  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 9:05 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 10,950
Also, office space isn't the only reason to build large projects. There are a number examples around the world and even here in NA (Trump Chicago?) in which super talls are not office, or only partially office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1450  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2012, 9:30 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,513
4 major office towers have been constructed in 4 years, and 2 more in construction. Surely Toronto is punching above its weight... at least in terms of quantity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1451  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2012, 9:29 AM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
The Shard is mixed-use, same with John Hancock. That's the sort of thing I'd like to see be a supertall in Toronto, and the type of thing I think would make it possible.

NO BALCONIES though.
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1452  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2012, 2:50 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Surely Toronto is punching above its weight... at least in terms of quantity.
Based on what? Don't forget that due to the recession in '90s there wasn't any significant office construction in Toronto for almost a couple of decades. I've got to imagine that there was a backlogged demand for space as a result.

I think it's telling that Brookfield is moving ahead with Bay-Adelaide East. I'm sure that Brookfield has a solid grasp of the health of Toronto's office market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1453  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2012, 6:15 PM
whiteford's Avatar
whiteford whiteford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
4 major office towers have been constructed in 4 years, and 2 more in construction. Surely Toronto is punching above its weight... at least in terms of quantity.
Toronto is building tones of stuff. most cities in north America could only wish to have one tenth of what is being built in Toronto. or even Calgary for that matter. driving around Calgary is like driving around one big construction site it seems. haha
__________________
North Battleford!?!.... jeez how did this happen?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1454  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 3:42 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post


from 3Dementia/maldive at ut.
Remember when this was just a vision of the future? This was from 2009.

Today, virtually everything in that rendering (with the exception of Signature Tower and 45 Bay, which don't make huge impacts from that angle, and a slightly shorter and newly designed One Bloor) has either been built or is well under construction. This will essentially be Toronto's skyline in a couple of years.

Perhaps we need another update to include all the proposals since then that will make a big impact from that angle. There are too many to count, but the ones that are already in sales include: Ten York, Massey Tower, 88 Scott, INDX, Karma, Casa II and Chaz on Charles. Those not in sales or which may still be a couple years off include: 50 Cumberland I & II, 50 Bloor, 460 Yonge, 501 Yonge I & II, 880 Bay, 43 Gerrard, 480 University and 90 Harbour I & II.

My dream of an unbroken wall of skyscrapers from the lake to Yorkville is surely coming to fruition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1455  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 4:08 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Wow that's even missing quite a bit too... Picasso would also be visible from this angle, yes?
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1456  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 4:34 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
Wow that's even missing quite a bit too... Picasso would also be visible from this angle, yes?
I suppose it would be, along with a lot of other projects in the Entertainment District, but I don't know if it will be tall enough to breach the skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1457  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 5:15 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
This rendering from Traynor from two years ago is probably the most accurate depiction available of Toronto in 2014/2015 if we include only those projects that are already under construction (minus 880 Bay, plus Southcore Delta, plus RCMI Tower, plus a height increase to FIVE, plus a bunch of stuff in the Entertainment District).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traynor View Post
Here you go guys. This is the view of the North/South skyline from the West looking East. The Lake is on the far right and Young and Bloor is on the far left. I labeled one of the renders so Phil can see where everything is going. I also finished projects like the FCP re-clad, Ritz and TIFF just to clean the pic up.

The original photograph by Ramako is on the bottom.

Enjoy






(Original courtesy Ramako here on SSP http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...179351&page=45 )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1458  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 5:19 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Alright, I'm kinda on an old future renderings kick now. This is Traynor again from two years ago. This is almost exactly what the classic view of the skyline will look like in a year or two (plus L Tower):


Quote:
Originally Posted by Traynor View Post
I revised one of my renders from a while back.

I increased the heights of ICE I and II. As well I added Infinity 4 and the Southcore complex of the Delta Hotel and Bremner Tower.


(Original Courtesy Caltrane74)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1459  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 6:17 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The Dartmouth skyline across from Halifax is in the process of changing dramatically. The current Dartmouth skyline is pretty limited, but SekishikiMeikaiHa recently posted a photo that shows the first almost completed phase of King's Wharf (two buildings -- one white building is visible next to the RBC building). Soon there will be four highrise buildings, which is a big change for Dartmouth, and so far they look surprisingly good.



Next year the developer plans to start on the 30 storey main tower. There will be on the order of a dozen new buildings in total, plus there is a development site across the street that might be developed as a highrise. Downtown Dartmouth might see its population just about double over the next few years (King's Wharf has about 1300 units).

Here's a picture of the King's Wharf model. Two buildings on the left are just about complete and two more are about the start. The 30 storey tower is not shown. The blocks at the bottom of the photo show the beginning of the existing downtown area which corresponds roughly to where the pyramid-shaped highrise (actually designed by Arthur Erickson) is in the skyline shot above.


Source


The "iconic" tower. Not sure if this is a final design:


kingswharf.ca
Right on!
My old home town getting some action.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1460  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2012, 6:20 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
From Big Daddy at UT

Yorkville a couple years ago.



Yorkville of the future.. (including 50 Bloor and 1 Bloor East)



http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showthr...ciates)/page28
This is Great!
I love how the now dominating 4S will be dwarfed when this is reality.
I'm a big fan of 4S - but a bigger fan of growing taller.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.