HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4721  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 12:22 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by djh View Post
Who knows what happened behind closed doors? We're hearing the press releases. For all either of us know, they both couldn't come to a mutually-beneficial agreement. So it was a good business decision on Telus' part not to sign any proposed contract.

Don't try to turn a non-partisan comment a political opinion, please and thank-you.
Wow... a conspiracy theorist on top of a revisionist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4722  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 12:40 AM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Wow... a conspiracy theorist on top of a revisionist.
Now you're making needless hyperbolic statements, and calling names on top. Not necessary and not very civil. No history was "revisioned".


The point is, we don't know how this went down, so to say "the government" cancelled it is speculation. I simply said it was a good business idea for Telus not to sign a contract with the government if they would not get much name recognition. You're implying the Government held all the contractual strings and "pulled the plug", as if you know so for a fact. Do you know that's what happened? If so, please state your source.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4723  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 12:41 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,429
The article clearly states that Telus was not happy with the withdrawal of the offer.

Did you read it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4724  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 12:54 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
It takes two to make a deal, Telus had strict conditions, the province wouldn't give on them so there was no deal. Telus had just as much influence on that outcome as did the province. Of course Telus isn't pleased with the withdrawal, I suspect neither is the province. They couldn't agree, I fail to see how anything djh said is inaccurate. Telus was wise not to sign a contract that they wouldn't be able to maximize name recongintion on.
I personally can't defend the province on this one, they felt the BC Place namesake was worth more then $40M, not suer I agree. If they have another offer on the sidelines then I'm willing to change my mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4725  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 1:31 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,182
Air Canada pays 1.5 million per year for the naming rights for the home of the Toronto Maple Leafs and Raptors, which has much much higher media exposure than BC Place. On the surface it seems shocking that Pavco would turn down 2 million per year, but I'm sure there's more to the story.

It's a bit of an older list, but here's where the article is with a list of naming rights.

http://espn.go.com/sportsbusiness/s/stadiumnames.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4726  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 1:39 AM
NewWester NewWester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
I think we missed out on some hilarity: it could have been "bell pitch at telus stadium"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4727  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 2:59 AM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
I'm happy that it's staying BC Place... I really do hope though that the extra interior advertising possibilities is really worth the same $2 million a year. Seems pretty stupid, though - if the government was hardline about keeping the original name, why would they even start negotiations in the first place? How could it get to such an advanced stage when there is such a fundamental impasse? Doesn't make sense
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4728  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:00 AM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
wow. the first image gives us a nice view of cosmo and the hilton site on robson, but an even better view of how colossally stupid it would be if canadian metropolitan properties were allowed to obstruct the iconic water view of the stadium with that conceptual china television-style building. i don't at all support more parkland there, instead hoping to see a golden gai or something, or at least some canals, but man, i also really hope not to see that view obstructed by a tower, no matter how nice.

the second one give us a sense of how completely canada hockey place (hehe) would disappear from the landscape behind all the developments planned around it. not a huge loss imo, but certainly a noticeable one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4729  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:21 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaperTiger View Post

And to equate naming rights to a stadium to selling rights to schools and libraries is a total red herring.
Lol ok how exactly is it a red herring? All are built with tax payers money so why not sell naming rights to recoup those costs? So it's ok to name bc place telus place but not yvr to telus airport? What's the difference? Both are 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 tacky
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4730  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:22 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,429
I understand the emotional desire to defend more unique and individual naming such as Fenway. But BC Place? Come on! That's already the name of our whole entire province! It's not going to be lost in the sands of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4731  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 4:38 AM
cc85 cc85 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Island City
Posts: 451
Would you support a bid for Miller Genuine Draft to purchase naming rights to BC Children's Hospital for 50 million? Imagine all the publicity! 50 million dollars can do a lot for sick kids!

How about taking a wild ride along the Trojan Highway (formerly the STS Highway)?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4732  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 5:00 AM
Waders Waders is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,361
The Vancouver Sun's article seems to give some detail what led to the decision. Telus wants the stadium to be named Telus Park and "Telus’ demand that all public reference to BC Place should cease".

Also, the following might be a factor to the decision.
Quote:
Bell, the minister, said killing the deal now lets PavCo sell advertising sponsorships on the inside of the building that he thinks will amount to more than $40 million over the same 20 year term...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4733  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 5:48 AM
touraccuracy's Avatar
touraccuracy touraccuracy is offline
Registered Loser
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,569
come on people, they're not idiots and they need money so clearly they valued those naming rights differently than telus did.

maybe telus wanted a deal that restricted other corporate advertising inside, and the gov't figures they can still sell the naming rights to someone else AND sell interior advertising for a combined amount greater than 40 mil. the province obviously feels they can get more money somehow and this is the sort of thing that is well researched and discussed before hand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4734  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 2:48 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Wow... a conspiracy theorist on top of a revisionist.
I hardly think someone saying that what goes on behind closed doors of a boardroom not being reported makes them a conspiracy theorist. One would have to quite naive to assume that everything that is discussed in a boardroom makes the public realm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I personally can't defend the province on this one, they felt the BC Place namesake was worth more then $40M, not suer I agree. If they have another offer on the sidelines then I'm willing to change my mind.
I'll quote this as it's about exactly how I feel regarding this deal. No way I would value nostalgia at $40M but I dont know the full story so I'll just have to wait and see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Lol ok how exactly is it a red herring? All are built with tax payers money so why not sell naming rights to recoup those costs? So it's ok to name bc place telus place but not yvr to telus airport? What's the difference? Both are 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 tacky
Well there is some truth to what you are saying there is most certainly a difference between a sports stadium and a library. One is an inherently business related sports centre, the other is a cerebral place of learning.

In terms of naming the airport, I don't really have a problem with it, although I'd expect far more than $40M given the international exposure naming an airport would bring.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4735  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:15 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,430
Lol ok just to be clear I never said libraries

I find city's selling naming rights to hinges as tacky and cheap. If yvr was named after a corporation it would make Vancouver look like some destitute desperate for cash city
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4736  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:18 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waders View Post
The Vancouver Sun's article seems to give some detail what led to the decision. Telus wants the stadium to be named Telus Park and "Telus’ demand that all public reference to BC Place should cease".

Also, the following might be a factor to the decision.
Kind of like how PavCo said "It's ok that we didn't get the casino development, we'll get a bunch of other investment in the area to cover the same amount of money..." How's that working out?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4737  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 3:19 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
In terms of naming the airport, I don't really have a problem with it, although I'd expect far more than $40M given the international exposure naming an airport would bring.
Don't airports with obtuse names already confuse travelers enough? If it were named the HSBC airport, that sounds like it could be anywhere
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4738  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 4:10 PM
TwoFace's Avatar
TwoFace TwoFace is offline
Dig-it
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
Don't airports with obtuse names already confuse travelers enough? If it were named the HSBC airport, that sounds like it could be anywhere
Airports don't get named after fast food restaurants or banks, rather historical figures like Trudeau, Pearson, Kennedy etc..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4739  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2012, 8:59 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by touraccuracy View Post
come on people, they're not idiots and they need money so clearly they valued those naming rights differently than telus did.

maybe telus wanted a deal that restricted other corporate advertising inside, and the gov't figures they can still sell the naming rights to someone else AND sell interior advertising for a combined amount greater than 40 mil. the province obviously feels they can get more money somehow and this is the sort of thing that is well researched and discussed before hand.
That's what the statements made by the Government seem to infer (they wouldn't be allowed to disclose specific terms and conditions).

That seems odd if other third party advertisers were banned from inside "Telus Park"
(i.e. Rogers Arena has lots of third party advertising inside - that's the whole reason for the pixelboard displays ringing the stadium
(maybe Telus demanded terms tied to its supply of the pixelboards?))

If they sold off the exclusive rights to use those pixelboards (for 20 years) for a fixed fee, that would be a dumb move.
If they sold those rights at all (which wouldn't be advisable) it would have to be for a royalty (%age of the revenue), not a fixed fee.

Sounds like someone in Government actually read the contract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4740  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2012, 6:37 AM
Steveston Steveston is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 472
Frankly, I'm rather sick of the whole corporate naming of arenas and stadia. Call me old fashioned, but I long for the days when you could actually tell where the stadium was located by it's name. I knew that "Three Rivers Stadium" was in Pittsburgh, "Taylor Field" was in Regina, "The Forum" was in Montreal, and "The Orange Bowl" was in Miami. Where the heck is the "Edward Jones Dome", "M & T Bank Stadium", "The Prudential Center", or "Scotiabank Place"?

Gimme "BC Place" over "Telus Park" anyday of the week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.