Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto
That Portland video shows just how slow LRT is when it is operating in the middle of the street without the barriers which Calgary and Edmonton use.
No wonder it takes LRT 29 minutes to go from Columbia and Interstate (the start of the street running section) to downtown Portland, vs 10 minutes in a car.
And they wonder why transit modal share is so bad in Portland. Could this be one of the reasons?
Calgary and Edmonton did it right. Other cities have not followed.
|
Portland has 126,000 people using its TriMax service every day. For an American transit system that is highly successful.
Calgary and Edmonton are the only cities in Canada to implement Light Rail, a comparison to American cities is simply disingenuous. American cities are built and grew in a very different fashion than Calgary and Edmonton. The urban cores are deserted, they have built a strong inter-state freeway system, they have a greater emphasis on suburban employment centres which are scattered across the city.
I don't know Edmonton very well, but I do know Calgary well. Calgary did not develop in this fashion. The urban cores is highly developed, with the CBD being the primary employment node. The city has encouraged the urban core to remain the primary employment centre through various policies. The city has also encouraged greater LRT use by discouraging automobile usage. The city hasn't built a single urban freeway, the city has limited parking in the CBD. At the same time Calgarians are Canadian and for odd reason Canadians just seem to take transit a lot more than Americans.
The real reason for the success of Calgary's LRT has more to do with factors which do not actually include the LRT itself. If you have the time see if you can dig up statics on old express bus network which Calgary ran along the current LRT corridors you will likely see very high ridership on those as well.