Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan
I'm pretty sure that Silverstein Properties would be aware of pretty much any change orders that arise, since they are acting as the owners of the building (even if they don't technically own it). They're just not in the business of updating their websites to sate the interests of skyscraper enthusiasts who are interested in all sorts of major and minor construction details. Nor is it the business of the Port Authority to do so with their own website.
Basically, we can observe and report the updates that are posted on these websites, but we shouldn't rely on them as being completely accurate or current. And we certainly shouldn't be using them as rock-solid sources to back up our opinions and claims. After all, what was the last project of any kind in which the owners and construction company were forthright with keeping the public informed of exactly what they were doing, and when they were doing it?
|
Silverstein Properties not the owner or operator of 1 WTC at all. The 2006 deal with SPI gave 1 WTC and 5 WTC back to the Port Authority to own, build and manage. 1 WTC is owned by the PA, being built by Tishman as an agent for the PA and all contracts for the building are authorized by PA Board. It will be managed by a JV of durst/PA. SPI has nothing to do with 1 WTC, many many things have changed in it's design since SPI turned it over to the Port.