HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2012, 10:50 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
There certainly is a beauty to northern Ontario, but it's also quite humbling driving through it in -35C. You realize very quickly how much trouble you're in if you run out of gas or the car breaks down. We had the heat on full blast the whole time, but my feet never really warmed up. I had to massage them continuously to avoid frost bite. I ended up sitting cross legged on the seat and covered with blankets for about 3 days straight.

Don't do that trip in a VW during winter; the heater just isn't strong enough.
And when did you do this that it was -35 for three days straight? Most of us put mitten warmers in our boots if it's a problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
There really isn't any room for additional lanes along the existing Highway 17 ROW without a lot of blasting. I wouldn't be surprised if entirely new ROWs weren't considered for such a project.
What will likely happen is a new two lane ROW will be built, and the existing highway will be the east-bound lane. At places they could be half a mile apart; since intersections are so few and far between, it won't be a major issue that they're not exactly parallel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Because of where I live though, the remoteness aspect of Northern Ontario isn't at all dissuading. I'm used to it.
Yes, well someone from Southern Ontario might not be used to it. And we've forgotten about another important aspect: Cost of gas. You're going to have to fill up at least twice to drive through Northern Ontario and our gas prices are among the highest in the country.
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2012, 10:56 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
What will likely happen is a new two lane ROW will be built, and the existing highway will be the east-bound lane.
I find that unlikely. Ontario doesn't like to do things that way if current freeway construction and dual carriageway projects are any indication. What I would expect is for the current road to become safer with more passing lanes over the years, and for more passing lanes and bypasses to be added along the way.
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2012, 11:56 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Ontario doesn't have terrain like that anywhere else. Short of diverting the highway tens of miles away from its old location, they won't have much choice in many places.
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 12:26 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Ontario doesn't have terrain like that anywhere else. Short of diverting the highway tens of miles away from its old location, they won't have much choice in many places.
Which is why I think that 17 will probably never been completely twinned. It will be straightened and improved, as it always is, but twinning in most places between Sault St. Marie and Nipigon....probably not.
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 12:53 AM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Ontario doesn't have terrain like that anywhere else. Short of diverting the highway tens of miles away from its old location, they won't have much choice in many places.
In some of the tightest areas (Lake Superior Park, Nipigon to Schreiber) they may have to go with a narrow 4-lane ROW with a concrete median barrier. Most likely a lower-than-ideal design speed as well (and that would force the speed limit to stay at 90 km/h in a few spots).
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 1:10 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
I think that may be a possibility for most of that part of the route, but I wouldn't expect completion before 2050....if then.
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 6:15 AM
J-MAN's Avatar
J-MAN J-MAN is offline
high expectations
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Winnipeg
Posts: 556
This video was taken on the eastern Perimeter hwy just outside Winnipeg then ends on the eastbound Trans Canada.

Video Link
__________________
I am not ashamed to say I have Aspergers, Schizophrenia, and Anxiety.
___________
My Saint Andrews (in winter) Photo thread (Jan 2012).

My Hoar Frost Photo Thread (Feb 2012).
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 3:38 PM
catkat catkat is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbeaumont View Post
I really don't understand the fuss about going through the US. I drive back home to the Edmonton area every year, I've tried going by the US a few times but every time I always get stuck in some kind of traffic in Chicago or Minneapolis which makes me lose any time I would have gained going through that way anyway. At least going by Canada I don't have to worry about sitting in bumper to bumper traffic in Thunder Bay or Kenora. I much prefer going by my own country and supporting my own economy, and at the same time seeing new developments happening across the country at the same time. Yes, I agree some parts aren't too exciting, like Highway 17 around Ignace and Upsala, but other areas more than make up for it.
Thats why you avoid Minneapolis by staying on i-90 instead of i-94

As for Chicago, you can completely bypass their brutal traffic by taking the Indiana Toll Road

problem solved

I've done cross country through the US and Canada. I-90 is vastly superior to the Trans Canada in terms of travel time
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2012, 3:42 PM
catkat catkat is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewjm3D View Post
London to Windsor is a flat snoozefest, I'm not a fan of seeing miles and miles ahead, it makes the drive feel that much longer. I'd rather cross in Niagara but I usually lose out to whatever google map was printed out for the trip.
Errr Niagara is at the other end. You must mean Sarnia
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 6:38 AM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by catkat View Post
Thats why you avoid Minneapolis by staying on i-90 instead of i-94

As for Chicago, you can completely bypass their brutal traffic by taking the Indiana Toll Road

problem solved

I've done cross country through the US and Canada. I-90 is vastly superior to the Trans Canada in terms of travel time
If you drive to Vancouver from Southern Ontario, take I-80. It's a bit longer (120 km or so), but shows a lot more diverse scenery, and in winter, you're further south, so you can avoid the chance of snow from time to time.
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 7:13 AM
Andrewjm3D's Avatar
Andrewjm3D Andrewjm3D is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by catkat View Post
Errr Niagara is at the other end. You must mean Sarnia
No, Niagara.
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 3:35 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
If you drive to Vancouver from Southern Ontario, take I-80. It's a bit longer (120 km or so), but shows a lot more diverse scenery, and in winter, you're further south, so you can avoid the chance of snow from time to time.
Driving westward, take the I-80 until, say, Salt Lake City, and then the I-84 up to British Columbia?
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 3:55 PM
toaster toaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 332
I read somewhere once that 17 is being slowly upgraded to freeway as far North/West as North Bay and Sudbury (from 417s current terminus in Arnprior), but no specific timeline or anything was given.
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 4:28 PM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
I would be surprised if it were twinned past Pembroke/Petawawa.
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 4:36 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,794
To my knowledge, the MTO hasn't made any announcements regarding the future extension of Hwy 417 beyond Arnprior. That said... it only makes sense that they'll keep going further west with it. Maybe Renfrew by 2020?
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 4:58 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Suspension bridge part of 11/17 four-laning
Highway expansion rolls ahead

Ian Ross | Northern Ontario Business | 23 January, 2012

The four-laning of Highway 11/17 between Thunder Bay and Nipigon will include the construction of Ontario's first cable suspension bridge.

...


Ontario's first cable suspension bridge will be over the Nipigon River.

“This is a unique location,” said Doug Cooper, the Ministry of Transportation's (MTO) head of planning and design in Thunder Bay. “ ... The Nipigon River is a world-renowned brook trout area and there is a spawning area where this bridge is.

“Our environmental requirements forced us to stay close to the existing bridge and within our existing right of the way, and stay out of the water. ... ”

...

The Highway 11/17 four-laning work is part of the Ontario government's $618-million budget for the Northern Highways Program.

...

Although the entire series of projects, which began in 2010, are expected to take 10 years, Cooper said if funding continues to arrive at the current rate, it could be wrapped up within the next eight years.

...

The Nipigion bridge and its approaches are part of four projects now in the design stage, including a 13-kilometre stretch between Highway 527 and Mackenzie Station Road, a 12-kilometre piece from Red Rock Road No.9 to Stillwater Creek Bridge, and an eight-kilometre section between Birch Beach Road and Highway 587.

As far as any talk of four-laning Highway 17 east of Nipigon, along the rocky and hilly shores of Lake Superior, Cooper said those discussions are way off in the future.

...

http://www.northernontariobusiness.com/I...on-bridge-part-of-11/17-four-laning.aspx
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 5:37 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,794
^ Are there any construction photos kicking around of the twinning going on along Highway 11/17 between Hodder and Hwy 527? Not that I am expecting the highway to look any different then any other twinned highway, but it would still be nice to see an update.
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 5:53 PM
Andrewjm3D's Avatar
Andrewjm3D Andrewjm3D is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,702
Nice to see they are making that sort of investment.


But it's not the first Cable suspension bridge in the province. It may just be the largest one that's fully in Ontario.

Built in 1912 so it hits 100 this year. Located just north of the Toronto Zoo.
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 6:19 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewjm3D View Post
But it's not the first Cable suspension bridge in the province. It may just be the largest one that's fully in Ontario.

Built in 1912 so it hits 100 this year. Located just north of the Toronto Zoo.
That is very cool and all, but that is a suspension bridge ... which is not the same as a cable stayed bridge ... which is what has been proposed for the Nipigon River.

Changing Gears, I'd like to present the evolution of a six-lane highway. This is the Windsor to Tilbury section of Highway 401, some of these photos were taken back in 2004/2005, but if your a construction junkie like me, you'll love this stuff:

December 2004:


September 2005:


October 2005:


Construction was completed late in 2006:
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2012, 7:10 PM
catkat catkat is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Windsor is very much like Detroit in that they both use concrete as road surfaces more than the GTA. I rarely see driveways poured with concrete in the GTA, its always ashphalt or brick, but down in Windsor concrete driveways are the norm. Ontario's small portions of concrete highways are also in close proximity to Michigan (Windsor and Sarnia)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.