HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Montreal Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• Montreal Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2011, 4:44 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,774
I never liked this one from my hometown. The ice rink is somewhat cool, but the building is so screamingly mediocre 90s...

I much prefer 1250 Rene-Levesque (at least, the east-facing side)


wikipedia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2011, 8:10 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 23,161
always liked this building

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2011, 11:49 PM
stormkingfan stormkingfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PhilaPA
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by staff View Post
Hopefully Montréal will get a new tallest soon.
If this is as tall as the city allows, the only way Montreal could get a new tallest is if it were built near Rue Notre-Dame Ouest and Rue University, which is at a lower elevation than 1000 Rue de la G.

Some time ago, I noticed a proposal for twin 60-storey towers near the end of Autoroute 10.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2011, 11:52 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,933
That pipe dream is long gone. There is presently no publicly known tallest building proposal in Montreal. A 197m building is our tallest proposal right now.


Sadly, for the haters, Le 1000 will be our tallest for another long while, I'm afraid.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2011, 1:31 AM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
I don't see anything wrong with it. It is fairly ascetically pleasing and unique.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2011, 11:18 PM
stormkingfan stormkingfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PhilaPA
Posts: 503
I think it's fine, too. It's got its own kind of character.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2011, 11:53 PM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,607
I like it! Of course, I like anything postmodern, but I think the building is perfectly fine. Maybe it could be a tad thinner or perhaps a spire, but personally I wouldn't change it. I think it also commands the skyline quite nicely:


Source: media.cns-snc.ca


Source: kuoni.co.uk


Source: city-data.com


Source: quebecporcelainartists.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.