Quote:
Originally Posted by testarossa50
I wish we could get some new apartments in Midtown that aren't super-high-end (I mean, there seems to be a endless number of people willing to pay $1,000/mo to live there; probably not so many willing to pay $1,600/mo), but this will definitely be cool. Apartments fill up fast usually and will put an extra ~500 people into Midtown walking around, going to restaurants, and so on.
Is it possible to get construction costs down to below $100k/unit by simplifying things a lot? When you go to cities like Hong Kong and Paris, most of the high-rise apartments aren't floor-to-ceiling glass with swimming pools and balconies and bocce ball and stuff. They are normal, middle-class buildings with normal-sized windows and so on. I want more of those.
|
A concrete slab room in an old building rents for $1,000++ in Hong Kong and Paris. Luxury apartments like we get in Atlanta here would rent for at least $5.00/SF. Construction costs, development costs, and the basis in the land are so high in those cities. In Midtown Atlanta and in Buckhead along Peachtree, land and construction costs can also be quite high but not that high. Lenders basically need units to rent out at at least $1.70/SF ( or some similar number). Translated, new construction 1-BRs are $1,500 and up ($2,900 in the Atlantic!), and 2-BRS start at about $2,000 and up.
Tax incentives can lower the cost of new construction, increase the return for the investors, provide comfort for lenders, and at the end of the day can even lower starting rents provided certain return metrics are met first. This is the scenario with Novare's Skyhouse.