Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed
Have an emergency plan for that, and make damned sure it works. The nature of the emergency is irrelevant - "trains can't go down 7th" is what you call it. And it happens all the time.
|
This.
Even for planned outages on weekends when ridership is much lower the shuttle service is a complete joke.
From the Herald article this morning:
"But how could a backup contingent of some 40 city buses - every roadworthy bus Calgary Transit had in its garages - possibly come close to replacing a daily cavalry of 42 three-car trains going through the downtown during the morning peak?"
I give CT credit for throwing everything they had at the problem, but clearly everything they had wasn't nearly good enough. I also appreciate that CT is really at the mercy of the funding they receive, and given the current state of that, I don't anticipate this sort of thing to be zero-impact.
That said, CT's failure to communicate is as evident as ever. It's immediately obvious that 40 buses fighting through rush hour traffic are not going to come anywhere close to providing adequate service in lieu of the train. This is not a surprise, so TELL PEOPLE THAT: "There are shuttles running between x and y, but capacity is very limited. Expect major delays or try an alternate routing to your destination." How difficult is that?
My wife got on the bus yesterday morning and the driver said *nothing* about any sort of problem at all. If he had, she might have just stayed home and worked remotely.
Honestly. If you know there's a major weakness in your network, the solution is NOT to direct as many people as possible toward that weakness. Give people the best information you can as early as you can so that they can make an informed decision about finding alternatives.
And no, saying "you should have subscribed to the twitter feed" does not make it okay. That doesn't really help someone standing in a mob waiting for a shuttle that you already know has no realistic chance of dealing with the volume in any meaningful way.
And finally, why Lions Park and Erlton? Why not Sunnyside and Victoria Park? If nothing else it would reduce the walking distance for those that chose to do so. Lions Park to a point in the middle of downtown is 3.9km which is a 46min walk according to google. Sunnyside is half the distance and only 24min. 22 minutes unnecessarily wasted times a few thousand people adds up to a lot of lost productivity. Even if you need to run the shuttles from Lions Park for some operational reason, you could let those that choose to walk stay on the train until Sunnyside.