Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainpathology
So this is what choice they have:
1.) A company which was given the responsibility to develop this area years ago says "hey we have a great idea on how to redevelop this station" after RTD essentially yanked the redevelopment from them to ask for specific requests for proposals. Now says "public market" "grand lobby" "lots of people coming through". Given what they've turned their original proposal for the area around Union Station has become those will likely be a Chili's-to-go, a hot dog stand and the same people there after they are done as are there now.
2.) A company lead by the person who saved an entire block of historic Denver architecture, turned it from an abandoned, crime ridden blight into Larimer Square.
Wow.. yeah I can see why this is SUCH a difficult brain teaser type choice for RTD.. 
|
Well said, sir.
The issue to parties involved is timing. When can the decision be made with the least public reaction. The parties involved, RTD, and, private partners, are highly sophisticated players of the public mood. I suspect that based upon how many decisions have been made on the basis of 'back room' power broker discussions over the years with Fastracks, TRex, the DUS line, the DUS Developement, etc., that this type of choice making is the rule.
The 6/6 RTD Board tie is comical: the old 'we truly care, and, it's so difficult for us' gambit.
Remember, all parties who made big bucks in this wierd public-private hybrid will want public praise and recognition inspite of the mess the public is left with, for power brokers, IMO, have only one weakness: their profound egoes.Part of 'pulling something off' is the applause they seek from the 'stupid masses' they fooled.