HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3141  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 5:15 PM
Simpseatles's Avatar
Simpseatles Simpseatles is offline
Wannabe Urbanite
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Waterloo/London
Posts: 708
Yikes! Count me out as a fan of 88 Scott. I mean what's with those randomly placed glass box things? I also think the whole "old meets new" sort of concept is outdated, and looks about as well executed as Trump. And finally, you get more annoying boxes and setbacks that lead to... a bigger box to top it all off. This looks more like the top of a condo in North York or something. Anyways, just my 2 cents.
__________________
"Sometimes I wonder if the world's so small, that we can never get away from the sprawl.
Living in the sprawl the dead shopping malls rise like mountains beyond mountains and there's no end in sight." -Arcade Fire
     
     
  #3142  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 6:24 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Just had some Gin shots!!!



Awesome!


88 Scott is a go!!
     
     
  #3143  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 6:46 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
the tower has a faux-historicist massing.
what, so only 1920s and 30s buildings are supposed to have setbacks at the top, everything else ever built has to be a box?
     
     
  #3144  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 8:28 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,798
I think the glass portion of the tower is awesome, but i think the historic part of it shouldn't extend so high up in the tower... or be non-existent except for the .

and i think setbacks are great, especially at those heights,

One thing this tower does exceptionally is how the tower rises from the podium/historic part below.

how tall is this thing gonna be again? 170-180m?
__________________
Visualizing the future of Toronto's urban centres Website @FutureModelTO
     
     
  #3145  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 8:54 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
195 meters - or "Very Tall"
     
     
  #3146  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 10:08 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,598
why do you guys think there is anything historic about the design of this tower? all of it looks to be to be very contemporary to me.

do you think anything that isn't glass must be historic revival?
     
     
  #3147  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 10:13 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
The setbacks are reminiscent of the Art Deco Style in New York during the 1930's.

Plus, the base is actually a historic building, to a very mild degree.
     
     
  #3148  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2011, 5:38 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
460 Yonge comes in at 198 meters (Canderal Stoneridge)

From Toronto Planning's Mike in TO.

198 meters should get this one to at least #12 on the top 25 list.
     
     
  #3149  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2011, 7:57 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveve View Post
I think the glass portion of the tower is awesome, but i think the historic part of it shouldn't extend so high up in the tower... or be non-existent except for the .
It's the exact opposite for me. I'm disappointed that they watered this done with glass. It's such a strong handsome base; I had high expectations for the rest of it. The old beauty of the base should have extended right to the top.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3150  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2011, 3:46 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
460 Yonge comes in at 198 meters (Canderal Stoneridge)

From Toronto Planning's Mike in TO.

198 meters should get this one to at least #12 on the top 25 list.
oh man!, you think they're borrow some design cues from Aura since it's the same developer and right down the street,... they gotta look good together,
__________________
Visualizing the future of Toronto's urban centres Website @FutureModelTO
     
     
  #3151  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2011, 5:00 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I really would like to see another 100 skyscrapers on Yonge- get it all dark.

Make it all Bladerunner Style!
     
     
  #3152  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2011, 5:38 PM
vegeta_skyline vegeta_skyline is offline
Registered User, Maybe
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,257
Yes, Bay st. shouldn't be the only north-south skyscraper canyon. I think it's inevitable. Once southcore, the Entertainment District and the East Bay Front are fully saturated with new developments what other location would be more suitable for increased densities?
     
     
  #3153  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 5:10 AM
Travis007's Avatar
Travis007 Travis007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,213
460 Yonge Street, Toronto

Images provided by CanadianNational on UrbanToronto:



__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #3154  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 5:19 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
^^^

Very reliable source at UT says that 460 Yonge will be 198.5 metres.
     
     
  #3155  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 5:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Cool! two "Aqua" knock offs in the same city! Plus Soho Italia in Ottawa is also quite similar.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #3156  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 7:54 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
I really would like to see another 100 skyscrapers on Yonge- get it all dark.

Make it all Bladerunner Style!
Agree, as long as they're not all 100-250m. A few in the 250-450 m range would be nice.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3157  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 1:01 PM
Vaillant Vaillant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
^^^

Very reliable source at UT says that 460 Yonge will be 198.5 metres.
so that is about the same as Montreal bell centre proposal... i was sure this tower would have 70floors what happened?
     
     
  #3158  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 2:51 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Actually, I believe the developer was originally planning 55 floors. So Infact they have increased the size of this proposal.

The development you might be thinking of is the Menkes proposal on Harbour. Twin 70 floor towers, which they are doing the rezoning for right now.

Other possible sites on Yonge street with 70 floor plus speculation:

- 1 Yonge (Toronto Star)
- 1 Bloor West
- Holt Renfrew (twin towers)
- Cumberland Terrace
- Yorkville Parking Deck ( currently proposed at 56/46)
- 197 Yonge Street (super tall speculation rampant)
- Yonge and Dundas
- 60 Harbour
- 45 Bay ( not on Yonge I know, but closeby)
     
     
  #3159  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 4:17 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegeta_skyline View Post
Yes, Bay st. shouldn't be the only north-south skyscraper canyon. I think it's inevitable. Once southcore, the Entertainment District and the East Bay Front are fully saturated with new developments what other location would be more suitable for increased densities?
There are places on Yonge deserving of towers but, for the most part, towers should be significantly setback from the street to preserve the mid-rise nature.

The Entertainment district has space for hundreds of new towers and the east side of Downtown thousands.
     
     
  #3160  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 4:19 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Cool! two "Aqua" knock offs in the same city! Plus Soho Italia in Ottawa is also quite similar.
i completely agree. In fact, this tower is more Aqua than even One Bloor, because the roof is flat, and the silhouettes of the balconies are more random,

photo by me:


but i don't mind... still better than that 120 harbour/twin tower boxes a little to the north,
__________________
Visualizing the future of Toronto's urban centres Website @FutureModelTO
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:29 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.