Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram
If both buildings get demolished, I can see the site getting at least the same height as the existing Hotel & Apartment buildings using 'grandfathered' building envelope rules - especially if the site stays with the same owners.
|
Firstly, from what I understand, if it's demolished and a whole new development permit is submitted, there's nothing to grandfather - it would be a whole new development, so as others have implied, they'd lose the rights to the previous height and would have to abide by whatever height restrictions apply now on that site - i.e., probably 4-6 stories.
Secondly, since it appears that the developer is at or near bankruptcy, who would pay for the demolition and all of the requirements that come with an asbestos-site demo? Does the city pay for this and go to the courts to get the money back from the owner, or what? If the developer is broke and the site is a hazard, then surely it can't be left up?
I'm interested in this one. I regularly walk past Douglas Park, about 10 blocks up Cambie from this site. A house burned down last month - it made the news because a hoarder lived there and he died because he couldn't get out due to the massive amount of cr@p in the way. When I walked by the next morning it looked like a scene from a horror film. When I went by the day after, the demo crew were there, and there were "Asbestos Hazard" signs up - ***while the digger was kicking dust into the air and polluting the surrounding houses***. So I wondered who authorized that, and who is paying for it?
(of note, only 1 of the demo guys had any kind of mask on...)