HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4181  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 2:12 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 8,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
I'm sure it meant to say getting from Coquitlam City Centre to Lougheed in 15 minutes.
Of course! I'm so dense.
     
     
  #4182  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 3:46 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Hmm... why is Bombardier of all things being forced to bid on a project that it'll technically win by default? I mean, it's the only company capable of providing the ALRT cars other than Kawasaki, and they are not on the list... =S
     
     
  #4183  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:07 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,039
Please correct me but are they needed for the construction of the guide-way and stations. Seems to me we would only need Bombardier for the rolling stock.

Anyways, if you were to re-read what is posted above today 15 minutes is the length of journey, for it also states that the trains will operate with 3 minute head-ways during peak periods to start.

Fantastic news, getting my camera revved up already for taking some pictures once construction starts!
     
     
  #4184  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:12 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
Canada line all over again? Bombier looses since there bid is higher even though they will give big discounts but aren't allowed to include in the bid. Sigh. Canada Line just feels so corporate and non Vancouver.
     
     
  #4185  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:18 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Hmm... why is Bombardier of all things being forced to bid on a project that it'll technically win by default? I mean, it's the only company capable of providing the ALRT cars other than Kawasaki, and they are not on the list... =S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Please correct me but are they needed for the construction of the guide-way and stations. Seems to me we would only need Bombardier for the rolling stock.

Anyways, if you were to re-read what is posted above today 15 minutes is the length of journey, for it also states that the trains will operate with 3 minute head-ways during peak periods to start.

Fantastic news, getting my camera revved up already for taking some pictures once construction starts!
The rolling stock is not part of the tender:

Quote:
TransLink will provide the vehicles, fare collection and fare gate equipment required for the Evergreen Line but the contractor will have to make sure the vehicles run seamlessly between the old and new parts of the Millennium Line and make sure the facilities can support the fare collection system.
     
     
  #4186  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 5:18 AM
Xerx Xerx is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 198
Providing the reaction rails perhaps?
     
     
  #4187  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 5:54 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,679
Just reading all these posts. So essentially, by "early 2012", all those prep work (i.e. North Road widening, CPR track relocating) will start happening and once the contract is awarded by summer, construction of the actual Evergreen Line will begin shortly after?

Am I misinterpreting or misreading anything? So essentially starting "early 2012", we'll be seeing some actual digging, physical signs of progress and all?

Just need to be sure if I got this right...
     
     
  #4188  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 6:34 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerx View Post
Providing the reaction rails perhaps?
That's just a piece of metal bolted to the middle of the track. Nothing special - can be easily made to spec.

Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
Just reading all these posts. So essentially, by "early 2012", all those prep work (i.e. North Road widening, CPR track relocating) will start happening and once the contract is awarded by summer, construction of the actual Evergreen Line will begin shortly after?

Am I misinterpreting or misreading anything? So essentially starting "early 2012", we'll be seeing some actual digging, physical signs of progress and all?

Just need to be sure if I got this right...

Sounds right.
That work is "by others" - so they'll be under separate tender and given the "small" scope of each project, can probably be awarded quickly.
     
     
  #4189  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:57 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,395
I would say within 4-5 months we should see some action!
     
     
  #4190  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 11:20 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,578
Here are some interesting tidbits in the summary of the scope of the project in the RFP.

Quote:
SUMMARY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SCOPE
 Obtaining necessary permits, approvals and authorizations, including those required pursuant to applicable federal and provincial regulatory requirements and legislation
 Site preparation including, where applicable, demolition of existing buildings
 Design and Construction of Guideway along the approximately 11-kilometre-long Alignment, including a combination of elevated and at-grade Guideway for approximately nine kilometres and approximately two kilometres through Bored Tunnel
 Design and Construction of an expansion of the existing Lougheed Town Centre Station and five new Stations and associated facilities
Design and Construction of a Vehicle Storage Facility
 Design, supply, installation and integration of Systems
 Road and other civil works required to accommodate the Project
 Utility relocations and other Utility Work
 Traffic Management, including maintenance of residential and commercial access along the Alignment
 Integration of the Evergreen Line with the Existing SkyTrain System including the existing Systems and the Existing SkyTrain System vehicle fleet
 Testing, commissioning and integration of all Evergreen Line components including necessary coordination with TransLink personnel
So the 3 platform station at Lougheed is for sure. And a storage facility? It also mentions that they need to plan for 3 potential future stations. Hmmmm, I wonder where they are.
     
     
  #4191  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 3:19 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
It sounds like the Columbia to Lougheed section will be a shuttle.

I wopnder if the expo Line serice in 2016 shorrt trurns at Metrotown?
     
     
  #4192  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:20 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
Sigh. Canada Line just feels so corporate and non Vancouver.
Umm, why exactly?

Because it doesn't run on elf tears and unicorn farts?
     
     
  #4193  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:43 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,169
Any reason why they wouldn't construct the station with the millennium spur ending in the middle allowing passengers to disembark from either side of the train to go into Coquitlam or Vancouver?

In this sort of configuration:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Sorry if it has already been discussed but I don't remember seeing anything about it.
     
     
  #4194  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 4:45 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
Here are some interesting tidbits in the summary of the scope of the project in the RFP.



So the 3 platform station at Lougheed is for sure. And a storage facility? It also mentions that they need to plan for 3 potential future stations. Hmmmm, I wonder where they are.
The PDFs showed reserved spots in West Port Moody, Falcon, and Lincoln
     
     
  #4195  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:08 PM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 861
Quote:
Sigh. Canada Line just feels so corporate and non Vancouver.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Umm, why exactly?

Because it doesn't run on elf tears and unicorn farts?
The Canada Line branding doesn't fit. The colour scheme, typography, symbols and information design don't conform to Trans-Links standards. I understand Canada Line is operated by a separate company but it's still part of Trans-link and the look and feel should seamlessly integrate with the rest of the system. The Canada Line has a very conservative and bland look.

Not to mention the stations were built to minimum standards. All stations look identical, but the real issue is the platforms are too short to accommodate future expansion and most stations only have up escalators, which is a pain especially for airport travellers with luggage.

At the end of the day the line is functional and as a regular user I'm very happy with it for the most part, but some aspects could be better.
     
     
  #4196  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:22 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjoeda View Post
The Canada Line branding doesn't fit. The colour scheme, typography, symbols and information design don't conform to Trans-Links standards. I understand Canada Line is operated by a separate company but it's still part of Trans-link and the look and feel should seamlessly integrate with the rest of the system. The Canada Line has a very conservative and bland look.

Not to mention the stations were built to minimum standards. All stations look identical, but the real issue is the platforms are too short to accommodate future expansion and most stations only have up escalators, which is a pain especially for airport travellers with luggage.

At the end of the day the line is functional and as a regular user I'm very happy with it for the most part, but some aspects could be better.
The short stations are un-Vancouver? The city where small is somehow holy? Say it isn't so!
     
     
  #4197  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:40 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjoeda View Post
The Canada Line branding doesn't fit. The colour scheme, typography, symbols and information design don't conform to Trans-Links standards. I understand Canada Line is operated by a separate company but it's still part of Trans-link and the look and feel should seamlessly integrate with the rest of the system. The Canada Line has a very conservative and bland look.

Not to mention the stations were built to minimum standards. All stations look identical, but the real issue is the platforms are too short to accommodate future expansion and most stations only have up escalators, which is a pain especially for airport travellers with luggage.

At the end of the day the line is functional and as a regular user I'm very happy with it for the most part, but some aspects could be better.

I use the Canada Line everyday now, and I actually love it! To me the stations are clean and very functional, all I want from a station! (trust me, the vast majority of metro stations in the world are conservative / bland, look at any JR or Hankyu station in Japan).

I actually prefer the rolling stock (for someone over 6 feet tall the leg room is great and the wider cars make it feel far more comfortable physiologically IMO)

As for capacity, I am not worried at all, I believe that it has been shown on here several times that ridership can comfortably nearly triple if the third C cars are added and the trains are run at their minimal headways (of course this will require the ordering of more A/B cars as well).

Also, not having down escalators is quite common on most metros i have ridden, unless they are hub stations. With that said, outside of the airport stations, Bridgeport, Waterfront and Vancouver City Centre should all have down escalators, the rest don't need them, the elevators are enough. (maybe Broadway when the M line is extended and it becomes a true hub).

Overall i would give the C-line a score of 8 out of 10, which is pretty good. (comparatively I would only give Seattle's new LRT line a 5 out of 10)

In fact, nothing — more now than transferring at Waterfront form a nice C-Line car to — old Mark 1 Expo line car with layers of newspapers thrown throughout it. (that being said I do love the new Mark 2 cars, and would rank them on par with the C-Line cars).

just my 2 cents, i feel when it comes to mass transit we get spoiled in Metro Vancouver (especially in North American terms). The C-Line is better and more "big city" IMO than any of the new LRT projects built throughout the US.
     
     
  #4198  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:42 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,039
Anyways, back on track, it looks like to me according the this diagram that Officedweller posted that the M line will not be a shuttle between Columbia and Lougheed but will interline with the Expo Line and run from Waterfront to Lougheed.

     
     
  #4199  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 7:49 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
If the minimum headways are 90s on the c line than capacity won't be an issue for a while. even 108s (combined e&M line would be a 65+ % increase in capacity, so the short platforms are not that much of a problem.
     
     
  #4200  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2011, 8:03 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Any reason why they wouldn't construct the station with the millennium spur ending in the middle allowing passengers to disembark from either side of the train to go into Coquitlam or Vancouver?

In this sort of configuration:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Sorry if it has already been discussed but I don't remember seeing anything about it.
That would function well for transfers in both directions, but would require them to build over/demolish the pre-built north guideway and switch (which are currently configured for a "side platform" arrangement.

Your arrangement would also require criss-crossing of trains east of the station (although the original plans for the routings also involved criss-crossing of trains, so that may not be a big deal).

The RFP asked for innovation in the bids - so maybe (hopefully) one of the proponents will suggest this.
One aspect I would hope they preserve is the ability to run through trains bteween New West and VCC-Clark.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:03 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.