HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3661  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 7:40 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
At least they can remove the height restriction on downtown now....
     
     
  #3662  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 7:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
^yup... new zoning already allows (subject to NAVCAN) up to 200m from 150m.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3663  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 7:46 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by graupner View Post
Nova Scotia was painful, no joke about it. I'm never going back there.
In all fairness, the last time you complained about NS you said you were living in Sydney. That is like if I spent a winter in Chicoutimi and then started ranting on SSP that Quebec sucks. Really your complaint seems to be that Sydney sucks. A lot of people could have told you that before you moved there.
     
     
  #3664  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 7:50 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^yup... new zoning already allows (subject to NAVCAN) up to 200m from 150m.
Why nothing taller than 200 m? What other problem is there to overcome?
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3665  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 7:51 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
^realistically that is a height that most buildings would fit under.

You can always pursue a DC2 application for something taller.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3666  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 8:37 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
that is awesome....one of my favourite architects...this could be one of the coolest buildings in canada when its done.

well done teedot.
     
     
  #3667  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 10:03 PM
whiteford's Avatar
whiteford whiteford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
wow! that's so amazing.

I really like that plan. - Still though, I wanna see some tall towers.

even with no tall towers, this plan is bang on good. i really like this one.
     
     
  #3668  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 10:24 PM
lake of the nations's Avatar
lake of the nations lake of the nations is offline
Utilisateur enregistré
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sherbrooke
Posts: 2,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
It looks like a larger, enhanced version of the 2-22 Ste-Catherine (in Montréal)!


©Société de développement Angus
The 2-22 of Quartier des Spectacles
     
     
  #3669  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2011, 11:39 PM
mhy mhy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38
Quote:
Awesome. This project hits all the right notes, from the massing to the ecology, etc. If anything, the suggestion of tall towers sound really boring in comparison... "oh look we can't contain the greedy developers from dropping in their spandrel boxes"
     
     
  #3670  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 12:08 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Guy, do you have your Guy Fawks mask and sleeping bag ready for the protest tomorrow?

Lol!
     
     
  #3671  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 3:49 AM
Travis007's Avatar
Travis007 Travis007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,213
Edmonton's City Centre airport redevelopment looks impressive. Beautiful mix of fine modern mid-rise architecture and landscaping. Great way to plan a human scaled, urban neighbourhood.

Ryerson's new student centre is going to have a great impact on Yonge Street. Should initiate higher quality retail and redevelopment of insignificant buildings, like those silly two storey buildings just north of it.
__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #3672  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 3:54 AM
Travis007's Avatar
Travis007 Travis007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,213
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2011/10/14/cppib-oxford-waterpark.html

CPP, Oxford team up on new Toronto bank tower

CBC News Posted: Oct 14, 2011 10:25 AM ET




Quote:
Two of Canada's largest pension plans are teaming up to build a new office tower in downtown Toronto that's slated to be the headquarters for Canada's largest bank.

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and Oxford Properties, the real estate arm of OMERS will build RBC WaterPark Place, a 30-storey office tower on Queens Quay between Bay and York Streets in Toronto's financial district.
Quote:
Construction is expected to begin by the end of the year and be completed by the third quarter of 2014.
Quote:
The building will have 930,000 square foot and the Royal Bank of Canada has signed on to be the anchor tenant, headquartering its domestic banking business in the LEED-certified building.

RBC will occupy 550,000 or 60 per cent of the 930,000 square feet. Their space alone will house some 4,000 employees.
http://business.financialpost.com/2011/10/14/rbc-trades-bay-street-for-bay-view/

RBC: On the waterfront



Quote:
Royal Bank of Canada, the country’s biggest bank, said Friday it is moving the headquarters of its domestic operations from a smattering of locations across the city to a sparkling new home on the north side of Queens Quay — outside the traditional Bay Street corridor bounded by Queen Street to the north and Front Street to the south.

The new 30-storey skyscraper to be developed by Oxford Properties, a unit of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board will be just a few blocks south of the Royal Bank’s corporate headquarters at the storied intersection at Wellington and Bay Streets.
Quote:
The tower will also have more than 50,000 sq. ft. for retail services and amenities and a view of Lake Ontario. It will be connected to Toronto’s PATH walkway system through an elevated, enclosed pedestrian bridge linked directly to the Air Canada Centre and Union Station.

Designed by Toronto-based WZMH Architects, construction of the tower is to begin in late 2011, which completion scheduled for the third quarter of 2014. Neither the cost of RBC’s lease nor construction costs were disclosed.
__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #3673  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 4:23 AM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
Really? Doesn't RBC have enough office space in their two ginormous gold towers? That building looks rather ordinary and small, for the country's largest bank.
     
     
  #3674  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 6:05 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^realistically that is a height that most buildings would fit under.

You can always pursue a DC2 application for something taller.
That few or no buildings will likely reach 200m or more isn't a reason to have a 200m height limit. That's like banning the construction of 50 m swimming pools because it's not likely to happen.

What's the real reason for the 200m height limit? So that no one will propose one?
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3675  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 6:32 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Really? Doesn't RBC have enough office space in their two ginormous gold towers? That building looks rather ordinary and small, for the country's largest bank.
Don't forget RBC Centre at 183 meters built just 2 years ago.
     
     
  #3676  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 6:43 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,423
I hate glass now!
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
     
     
  #3677  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 3:39 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
I didn't mind the first rendering of the new RBC tower, but the second one looks boring. I am actually more surprised with the location they choose.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #3678  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 5:04 PM
G.S MTL's Avatar
G.S MTL G.S MTL is offline
MTL♥
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by kool maudit View Post
i bet. it's really hard not to totally freak out and bug you all the time, but i know how it is.

still.... this is killing me. i look it up every day. i tell people at work about it.
tell people what?? whats going on?? is there a big proposal coming to MTL? i mean regardless if it is built downtown like near CIBC or LE 1000 it wont be more than 200m... i mean now if something like 260m or 300m was in the works then im very very interested!...dont get me wrong 190m to 200m ill take it lol but whats all this secret talk?...whats going on!!!!!? lol
__________________
Montreal, Pearl of Canada.
Population: 4.5 Million
     
     
  #3679  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 5:52 PM
mike474's Avatar
mike474 mike474 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 600
the Edmonton redevelopment looks incredible. Is there anything else like this in North America?? Seems like a proposal that actually embraces the human scale of old rather than making a few pandering concessions. I'd take quality streetscape over towers any day.
     
     
  #3680  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2011, 6:00 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
^sure, but not at this scale. Think olympic village on steroids, without the financial wazoo, and with more street interaction.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:49 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.