Quote:
Originally Posted by BevoLJ
This isn't in Austin. At least until it is annexed a few years from now. So I don't think they can do anything about the roads. All of those talks are being done with the county.
I can understand the whole point behind the corporate welfare. That the governments shouldn't be subsidizing these companies. And even more that the $25mil will be going to the UK not staying here in the US. But to expect that the developers build the roads is a stretch to me. That to me is the job of the governments (in this case the county and state.) Having the state give that money to get F1 to come here, and then having the developers do the state (and county's) job by building the roads just seems backwards. lol. What is next? Is the developers going to be expected to provide security and fire protections too?
|
No it isn't a stretch at all. There already is a taxpayer-paid road, FM 812, out there that is perfectly adequate for the amount of traffic demand currently on it. Here is a 2010 congestion map showing the segment in grey meaning "uncongested:"
http://campotexas.org/pdfs/Roadway%2...0in%202010.pdf
F1 wants their fans to have quick access in and out of the facility. Their is no constitutional right to quick and speedy ingress and egress to private motorsports facilities the last I checked. To me that is a luxury that they should pony up for because in a normal workweek that extra capacity is just a waste. Also not paying for a road upgrade will force the developers to find a more creative set of solutions, or not depending solely on capacity improvements for the performance they consider mandatory.
And it really doesn't matter if it the county or the city b/c in the end they will have to either take money from other projects or try to pass a bond package to pay for it. I guess it could matter if you live in the county and it was paid for by the city but that is really a zero sum game.