HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Three World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2021  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 1:56 AM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,921
NOOOO! How could they get rid of the x bracing! its looks faceless now! WHAT FOOLS! it could have been a recognisable new york icon.

Id reather it not even be built in the first place now, just leave it with 1 and 4 and put some mall in between it. im pissed now
     
     
  #2022  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 3:55 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post
Id reather it not even be built in the first place now, just leave it with 1 and 4 and put some mall in between it. im pissed now
Yeah, you really don't know what the rebuilding is about. It's not about if something doesn't fit your taste, don't build it. New York lost 11msf of office space a decade ago. This tower will be just a portion of that, but it must be rebuilt. Besides, I doubt just throwing a "mall" in between the towers would look any better or any more suited for the site and Manhattan in general.
     
     
  #2023  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 5:59 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,460
Well North One, someone's a little tardy to the party I don't really mind the loss of the bracing. I think that this assists in making the tower look more like it's part of a cohesive complex. It would be as if one of the two shorter buildings flanking the approach to Rockefeller Plaza from 5th Avenue were built in a totally different design style. It would then take away from the overall effect of the complex and distract from the overall feeling. Not to say that this was an unattractive proposal before, or that it diminished the effect of the complex. I'm just saying the loss of the bracing didn't hurt anything, IMO.
     
     
  #2024  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 7:14 AM
ChicagoSpire2000 ChicagoSpire2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
STR, I know it's probably stupid of me to tell you as you probably already know, but don't get rid of your original 3WTC renderings in the possibility this is all just a joke! X)
     
     
  #2025  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 5:21 PM
JesseNewYorkCity JesseNewYorkCity is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 129
Does anyone know if there will be a light at the top of the 175 Greenwich building like the John Hancock Center in Chicago?
     
     
  #2026  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 5:36 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,117
Since people keep asking questions about the New W.T.C. light scheme I thought I should post some pictures from the World Trade Center website.







There you go folks now enjoy.
Link: http://www.wtc.com/media/images/s/the-vision-world-trade-center
     
     
  #2027  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 9:59 PM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
Since people keep asking questions about the New W.T.C. light scheme I thought I should post some pictures from the World Trade Center website.







There you go folks now enjoy.
Link: http://www.wtc.com/media/images/s/the-vision-world-trade-center
GE like spot lights would be nice.
     
     
  #2028  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 10:49 PM
JesseNewYorkCity JesseNewYorkCity is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
Since people keep asking questions about the New W.T.C. light scheme I thought I should post some pictures from the World Trade Center website.







There you go folks now enjoy.
Link: http://www.wtc.com/media/images/s/the-vision-world-trade-center


So I guess that's a no Looks like building beside it has some what of a "round lighting" like the John Hancock Center has.
     
     
  #2029  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 11:00 PM
Servo's Avatar
Servo Servo is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 33
I do like how 4 WTC's lighting scheme compliments the rest of the site.
     
     
  #2030  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2011, 12:38 AM
Fishman92 Fishman92 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 236
I don't mind what they do with 3, i just can't wait to see 2 wtc' diamonds lit.
     
     
  #2031  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2011, 1:51 AM
JesseNewYorkCity JesseNewYorkCity is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishman92 View Post
I don't mind what they do with 3, i just can't wait to see 2 wtc' diamonds lit.

Same here! It will be so awesome when they get it built if they film behind the scenes of the top of how the WTC 2 building is lit.

For some reason lately, I have had an obsession with knowing what the roof of buildings look like..
     
     
  #2032  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2011, 6:57 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,055
     
     
  #2033  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2011, 4:19 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,055
Thanks to hoveringcheesecake at WNY.



     
     
  #2034  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2011, 8:30 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,055
     
     
  #2035  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2011, 1:16 PM
The Grand Architect's Avatar
The Grand Architect The Grand Architect is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 303
So does anyone know what happend to that cracked 2nd crane?
     
     
  #2036  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2011, 2:05 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,291
     
     
  #2037  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2011, 3:31 PM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
The problem with 3 WTC is it has too much detail. The Other towers are plain, but unique in their own way. The braceing on the tower is very cool, but dosnt belong in the complex. Maybe it would be better off without the exterior braceing.
The man was psychic!


(That post goes all the way back to 2007)
     
     
  #2038  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2011, 4:20 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,055
And so, the core rises...





http://evsdatacenter.netfirms.com/kpitv/silver.htm

Won't be long until B3 for the east bath tub is one single floor.
     
     
  #2039  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2011, 6:23 PM
STR's Avatar
STR STR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,078
Facade detail of new 3WTC model.



Old model vs new. While I'm obviously still working on the details of the latter, it's enough to show off overall differences between the designs.


Like I said before, I think they've chopped the height down to 1,170' total. I'm tired of counting floors and measuring proportions, so if someone else can reconcile this official render from RRS with a 1,240' height, I'd be curious to hear your reasoning.


Last edited by STR; Jul 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM.
     
     
  #2040  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2011, 8:54 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,117
Why would they shave the height of the building?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:36 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.