HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2461  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2011, 5:51 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Thank you for the pictures and unbiased report Dmajackson. I am sure that the Harbour Solutions project has had a positive effect on the Halifax Harbour. Your pictures and pictures by others provide the evidence of a successful wastewater treatment project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2462  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2011, 2:14 PM
-Harlington-'s Avatar
-Harlington- -Harlington- is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Halifax-Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,097
I think its definitely better than it was, everytime im near the waterfront it does seem like it got a lot clearer.

although you still wouldnt catch me swimming in there yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2463  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2011, 6:38 PM
Northend Guy Northend Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Halifax
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
Someone had posted that recently, but can't remember when or what thread. The site is on Portland, below five corners, across from the Tim's. Sounds good
I don't think it's the same site. The site I am referring to is right at 5 corners. My understanding is that it will be replacing something that is already there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2464  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2011, 8:02 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phalanx View Post
Yeah, the system seems quite flawed... given that it seems to back up just about any time there's a storm. And the fact that one of the collection stations occupies a chunk of prime real estate downtown will always annoy me. Surely there could have been other locations?
I mentioned this as well in a comment on the cbc.ca news story. Last time I checked I received over 45 thumbs down for saying "job poorly done". It appears that the few of us on here are they only group of people that feel a sewage treatment plant doesn't belong directly in the downtown.
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2465  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 6:55 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstaleness View Post
I mentioned this as well in a comment on the cbc.ca news story. Last time I checked I received over 45 thumbs down for saying "job poorly done". It appears that the few of us on here are they only group of people that feel a sewage treatment plant doesn't belong directly in the downtown.
Most of the folks that post on CBC.ca don't have a clue. I wish we could educate people through this forum. Its a terrible spot for the plant, I hope something can be developed over top of it some day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2466  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 10:47 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
There are two issues regarding the wastewater treatment plant:
1) The location of the wastewater treatment plant
2) The effectiveness of the wastewater treatment plant

If the argument is that the wastewater treatment plant is not effective then most people won't accept that argument, since all they have to do is look at the harbour and see the big improvement.

Regarding the location, I also wonder why that location was chosen but I haven't seen stories in the newspaper recently about odours coming from it. It doesn't look that much out of place next to the Halifax Dockyards.

In my opinion, the Mayor and Councillors who supported the wastewater treatment project deserve a lot of credit. And of course, there are many HRM staff members who worked on it behind the scenes. It seems to be a great success at a manageable cost.

When I consider the benefits of Mayor Kelly's term and Councillors, I consider the following as positives:
1) The harbour cleanup
2) The skating oval
3) BRT expansion
4) Significant employment growth
5) The Canada Winter Games event was a great success within a manageable budget.

Negatives
1) the Commonwealth Games result; in my opinion, it should not have been axed but instead the budget cut drastically. Then if Halifax didn't win the bid to be the host Commonwealth city, there wouldn't have been the lasting black eye on the municipality.
2) Slow movement on building an economical stadium and attracting a CFL team.
3) Too many development opportunities were turned away.

I consider the HRM_by_Design to be both a negative and positive. The planning and implementation were a great achievement but the height controls are too restrictive. It hasn't provided the building boom that it was intended to achieve.

Last edited by fenwick16; Jun 25, 2011 at 12:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2467  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 12:03 PM
JET JET is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northend Guy View Post
I don't think it's the same site. The site I am referring to is right at 5 corners. My understanding is that it will be replacing something that is already there.
I can't think of anything right at five corners that would be replaced. There are three nice old homes, a large apartment building and a duplex (small lot) on the five corners. Lets hope that it's not the nice old buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2468  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 12:23 PM
JET JET is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,040
the facade on mitchell's enviro on Gottingen st is coming down today. There is an excavator digging on the empty lot across the street next to the Company House
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2469  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 12:47 PM
terrynorthend terrynorthend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
I can't think of anything right at five corners that would be replaced. There are three nice old homes, a large apartment building and a duplex (small lot) on the five corners. Lets hope that it's not the nice old buildings.
Are they referring to the Portland/Pleasant intersection, or the Portland/Canal intersection down the hill? I've heard both of these intersections refered to as five corners by different people. I could see something replacing the old Moffatt's Pharmacy building, or maybe the building beside Bluebell Cabs...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2470  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 1:59 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrynorthend View Post
Are they referring to the Portland/Pleasant intersection, or the Portland/Canal intersection down the hill? I've heard both of these intersections refered to as five corners by different people. I could see something replacing the old Moffatt's Pharmacy building, or maybe the building beside Bluebell Cabs...
Five corners is the intersection of Portland and Pleasant and at one point Albert street used to come into it as well, hence the 5 corners.

I believe what is being referred to here is just down Portland Street from five corners. There was a public meeting a few weeks ago regarding a 40 or 60 unit 4 storey building to be built where the fire was a few years back. Here is the street view of the site.
http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=Dartmouth,+...BiYMGBbfEuJyaptaA&cbp=12,142.36,,0,-3.31
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2471  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 2:06 PM
JET JET is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
The site for the 4 storey apartment building at 222 Portland Street:

Just down from the pleasant/albert/portland five corners. Good potential there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2472  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 11:26 PM
spaustin's Avatar
spaustin spaustin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Downtown Dartmouth
Posts: 706
Geez the Knotweed sure loves a vacant lot. That fire wasn't that long ago and it looks like it's already well on its way to filling it in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2473  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 1:52 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by spaustin View Post
Geez the Knotweed sure loves a vacant lot. That fire wasn't that long ago and it looks like it's already well on its way to filling it in.
One thing HRM does better than any place in the nation is to encourage the growth of weeds. It's the dandelion/knotweed/creeping charlie capital of Canada.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2474  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 2:16 AM
TheNovaScotian's Avatar
TheNovaScotian TheNovaScotian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 247
The developer bought the blue and yellow houses in the picture, the lot for the yellow house is actually quite large, so he now owns quite a large chunk of prime downtown dartmouth property. I'm hoping that at the public meetings because the developer is going to need a DA, that the city allow the developer to maybe add a few stories to make it more economical to use good materials and make sure its not set too far back from the street hopefully maintaining the feel of the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2475  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 11:30 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
One thing HRM does better than any place in the nation is to encourage the growth of weeds. It's the dandelion/knotweed/creeping charlie capital of Canada.
True, if you need some good examples just stroll through the Public Gardens.
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2476  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2011, 12:20 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empire View Post
True, if you need some good examples just stroll through the Public Gardens.
Which is tragic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2477  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2011, 12:42 PM
eastcoastal eastcoastal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
There are two issues regarding the wastewater treatment plant:
1) The location of the wastewater treatment plant
2) The effectiveness of the wastewater treatment plant

If the argument is that the wastewater treatment plant is not effective then most people won't accept that argument, since all they have to do is look at the harbour and see the big improvement.

Regarding the location, I also wonder why that location was chosen but I haven't seen stories in the newspaper recently about odours coming from it. It doesn't look that much out of place next to the Halifax Dockyards.

In my opinion, the Mayor and Councillors who supported the wastewater treatment project deserve a lot of credit. And of course, there are many HRM staff members who worked on it behind the scenes. It seems to be a great success at a manageable cost.
Effectiveness: The Federal Government requires Secondary Level treatment, Tertiary is better, and the most responsible course of action, this project only achieves Primary.

Let's not pat ourselves on the backs for finally treating our sewage as it flows directly into our harbour. Do we really want to tell the world we are backwards enough to feel like Primary treatment is a progressive accomplishment for a capital city in the developed world in the Twenty First Century? We can do better.

Location: While there is no stunning urban context for this to fit into at this point, are we really at the stage where we feel like living up to the low standards of the dockyards is a positive? What about the idea that the city leads by example, and that this was an opportunity to use a piece of civic infrastructure to advance an agenda of great city planning? We can pretend that the values espoused by HRMbyDESIGN were not in place yet, but they are hardly new concepts.

The city should have used this project to be a little more forward thinking than: "Well, it only reaches the first level of treatment, although we know that the federal government is going to require at least the second level in the future, this is good enough. I suppose it's no worse than pseudo-industrial military dockyards, and I know that this is really one of the few 'gateways' to downtown, this is good enough. We are only Halifax."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2478  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2011, 1:37 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastcoastal View Post
Effectiveness: The Federal Government requires Secondary Level treatment, Tertiary is better, and the most responsible course of action, this project only achieves Primary.

Let's not pat ourselves on the backs for finally treating our sewage as it flows directly into our harbour. Do we really want to tell the world we are backwards enough to feel like Primary treatment is a progressive accomplishment for a capital city in the developed world in the Twenty First Century? We can do better.

Location: While there is no stunning urban context for this to fit into at this point, are we really at the stage where we feel like living up to the low standards of the dockyards is a positive? What about the idea that the city leads by example, and that this was an opportunity to use a piece of civic infrastructure to advance an agenda of great city planning? We can pretend that the values espoused by HRMbyDESIGN were not in place yet, but they are hardly new concepts.

The city should have used this project to be a little more forward thinking than: "Well, it only reaches the first level of treatment, although we know that the federal government is going to require at least the second level in the future, this is good enough. I suppose it's no worse than pseudo-industrial military dockyards, and I know that this is really one of the few 'gateways' to downtown, this is good enough. We are only Halifax."
All well said, and I believe that what you said has merit. But I believe it is being referred to as advanced primary treatment and there is the capability to upgrade to secondary treatment - http://www.halifax.ca/HWWTF/Myths.html. It should also be noted that advanced primary treatment in Halifax will be far more effective than such a system in Toronto that doesn't have ocean currents to disperse the discharge from the treatment facilities. (and unless all sea creatures start using toilets with wastewater treatment facilities then the ocean will always contain some biological discharge).

One question - if secondary treatment would have improved the harbour quality by an additional 10% then would residents have wanted to spend the much higher cost of such a facility? As is often the case, municipalities and individuals have to accept what they can afford. I am sure that many people would like to live in mansions, but instead live in smaller homes that they can afford. I don't want to sound sarcastic, but talk is cheap. I feel that the HRM got the best that it could afford. However, if residents are willing to pay much higher taxes then there is room for improvement.

On a related topic, the Cogswell interchange is a blight on the community and should be removed as soon as possible. This area looks far worse than the wastewater treatment plant - http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=halifax,+ns...8JPFRA4DKD80ybipg&cbp=12,136.55,,0,-2.81 . The Scotia Square Trade Mart looks worse than the wastewater treatment plant, in my opinion. The wastewater treatment plant is hardly even noticeable from Barrington Street.

Last edited by fenwick16; Jun 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM. Reason: corrected my spelling
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2479  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2011, 2:43 PM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,204
The location of the sewage treatment plant is a blight on downtown. The building was designed to hide an extremely cheap facade. This location is the gateway to downtown and all efforts should have been exhausted to locate it elsewhere. I think the original location was under the bridge but a property dispute canned that location.

There certainly was no effort to engage the public on ways to improve the usefulness or appearance of the structure. If the STP is not an objectionable operation then let's put a bus shelter on the top or perhaps a tourist bureau welcoming people to downtown.

The effectiveness of the plant is still up for debate. I walk along the boardwalk at noon and it is still hit or miss if the water is clear. There are still the occasional floatables and murky water. The murky water is not always due to storm water swamping the plant but can be any host of discharged liquids. An outfall below Summit Place still discharges a light grey product on occassion. Generally it is better but certainly not guarnteed. For +400 million we should be seeing clearer water most of the time.
__________________
Salty Town

Last edited by Empire; Jun 27, 2011 at 11:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2480  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2011, 2:43 PM
Northend Guy Northend Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Halifax
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
Just down from the pleasant/albert/portland five corners. Good potential there.
The drawing I saw says its 230 Portland St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.