HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #13681  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 3:53 PM
meh_cd meh_cd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 571
I have what I assume is the entire document they are talking about, and the people on this site, WiredNewYork, Skyscrapercity, and elsewhere all know more about the building than the document shows.

Hell, Zen posted a similar diagram YEARS ago. NY Post needs to shut up.
     
     
  #13682  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 4:22 PM
The Grand Architect's Avatar
The Grand Architect The Grand Architect is offline
Grand is Golden!
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 303
Let's concentrate on the construction and getting this tower up to 1,776 feet first before we start arguing about the podium glass.

Oh and about progressive collapse:

If a floor collapses, how would one "clean up the mess"?? It's great that we learned a few lessons from 9/11, but we need to implement them.
     
     
  #13683  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 4:46 PM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by meh_cd View Post
NY Post needs to shut up.
After reading the article, I have to agree that it is yellow journalism and fear-mongering at its best.

After the Post goes on to admit that the plans released were "scrubbed" of potential secrets and confidential information they immediately say this:

Quote:
Still, this isn't the first time the PA has accidentally exposed supposedly secret building plans for the World Trade Center site.
Which basically means that this event was a release of secret plans, but you just admitted that it wasn't a secret? Why is it included with other possible times secrets have been released?

Bad writing, bad reporting, bad journalism and a Non-Story,ramped up to make it seem important, to fill blank space in a newspaper.
__________________
_______________________________________
This is the Internet and is only the place for huge egos, narcissistic belief structures, imflamitory opinions, jumping to conclusions and knee-jerk reactionary thinking.
Any clear-headed, rational comments or balanced viewpoints will be considered Trolling and you will be reprimanded.
     
     
  #13684  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 5:00 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Grand Architect View Post
If a floor collapses, how would one "clean up the mess"?? It's great that we learned a few lessons from 9/11, but we need to implement them.
When one designs a building to withstand a disaster, one designs the building to stand only long enough to safely evacuate the occupants.

Basically, a material property of steel what is called a 'modulus of elasticity.'
What this means is that a steel member will have a certain strength when it is rolled out of the mill and installed in the building (notated as Oe on the graph). However, when great force stresses the member (say from an earthquake or an airplane impact), the member deflects and actually becomes stronger (notated as Ob on the graph). When the steel deflects further than that point, failure is iminent. This means that once steel has deflected, it may still stand but it cannot be deflected again.



Building safety design accounts for the standard strength of the steel, expecting that the modulus of elasticity of the steel will meet expected disaster loads forced on the building BUT with the understanding that once the building has survived the disaster, the steel is effectively damaged and no longer safe for continued occupancy. The building will likely need to be demolished.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
     
     
  #13685  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 5:42 PM
Kanto's Avatar
Kanto Kanto is offline
Twin Towers crusader
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 197
Thank you very much for your explanations folks. I'm glad to hear that they made precautions to prevent a disaster like 9/11. These buildings are a top target for terrorists. It's good to hear that this time they'll be prepared. I 100% agree that redundancy is the most important aspect of a skyscraper.

I'm also happy that the first non-government tenants showed up. That's what the WTC needs.

Before 9/11 I never imagined that a steel building could progressivly collapse. I thought only concrete and brick buildings could collapse this way. Then again, before 9/11 I never thought that somebody would hit a skyscraper with a plane. I mean, that's just insane.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post
Interesting. You don't even know the basic structure that the new buildings will be constructed with, yet in the other thread (WTC hypothetical musings), you claimed you understood "the complexity of the site".
I never issued such a claim. I only said that I know that building a skyscraper at that site is a complex process. I never said that I know the details of the building's structure. One reason for my topic is to find out if there are any technical or economical problems with my idea. If you know any details that would affect my idea, please visit my topic and post them there
     
     
  #13686  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 6:53 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is offline
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
When one designs a building to withstand a disaster, one designs the building to stand only long enough to safely evacuate the occupants.

Basically, a material property of steel what is called a 'modulus of elasticity.'
What this means is that a steel member will have a certain strength when it is rolled out of the mill and installed in the building (notated as Oe on the graph). However, when great force stresses the member (say from an earthquake or an airplane impact), the member deflects and actually becomes stronger (notated as Ob on the graph). When the steel deflects further than that point, failure is iminent. This means that once steel has deflected, it may still stand but it cannot be deflected again.



Building safety design accounts for the standard strength of the steel, expecting that the modulus of elasticity of the steel will meet expected disaster loads forced on the building BUT with the understanding that once the building has survived the disaster, the steel is effectively damaged and no longer safe for continued occupancy. The building will likely need to be demolished.
That's essentially the point in my post on the last page. The key is to design and construct the building to allow the building occupants to safely evacuate in a reasonable amount of time. Afterwards, the building (especially if it's hit by a jetliner flying at 300+ mph) will likely be too damaged to be considered safe for occupancy and to the surrounding environment, so it needs to be taken down.

And to expand on the graph you posted for those who want to learn a bit. This is called a stress(σ)-strain(Ɛ) curve.
- Stress is calculated as the force (F) on a material divided by the cross-section area (A) of the material (F/A). Essentially, it's the amount of force a material experiences.
- Strain is the amount a material stretches or compresses (I) divided by the original length (L) of the material (I/L). Essentially, it's how much a material can deform.
- The modulus of elasticity (E) is the slope of the stress-strain curve up to the elasticity limit (e).

The key area to steel's stress-strain curve (which is what's shown) is the section up to the intersection of σe and Ɛe, which is the elastic limit. A steel section can be stretched up this point, and it will go back to its original length once the force is released. For the most part, you want to design your steel members so that they don't encounter forces above the elastic limit, since you want all the members to remain the same length. In all structural design, you need to design for a certain factor of safety above the typical maximum loads, so you choose the member sizes accordingly (size means both the length and the cross-sectional area).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanto View Post
I never issued such a claim. I only said that I know that building a skyscraper at that site is a complex process. I never said that I know the details of the building's structure. One reason for my topic is to find out if there are any technical or economical problems with my idea. If you know any details that would affect my idea, please visit my topic and post them there
Actually, I quoted what you wrote word-for-word. And part of understanding "the complexity of the site" is knowing, at the very least, the basic structure of the building. Actually, you should understand a lot more than the basics if you're trying to push for your favored design. That way, you can make rebuttals and criticisms based on informed opinion.
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied
     
     
  #13687  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 7:27 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,983
Now that it's going to be filled with a bunch of Conde Nasties instead of bankers, maybe it will be less of a target.
__________________
From my head via my fingers.
     
     
  #13688  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 7:36 PM
Kanto's Avatar
Kanto Kanto is offline
Twin Towers crusader
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post
Actually, I quoted what you wrote word-for-word. And part of understanding "the complexity of the site" is knowing, at the very least, the basic structure of the building. Actually, you should understand a lot more than the basics if you're trying to push for your favored design. That way, you can make rebuttals and criticisms based on informed opinion.
I know you quoted it, but you have misunderstood what I meant. As I said before, I meant the complexity in general, not details. Though I would like to know more details, where do you think I could find them.
     
     
  #13689  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 8:02 PM
C.Lan C.Lan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
Now that it's going to be filled with a bunch of Conde Nasties instead of bankers, maybe it will be less of a target.
Wait, certain ones, specifically?
     
     
  #13690  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 10:09 PM
OptimumPx's Avatar
OptimumPx OptimumPx is offline
Basket Case
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
Now that it's going to be filled with a bunch of Conde Nasties instead of bankers, maybe it will be less of a target.
They didn't (and still don't) care who or what was in the buildings...just that people were in the building.
__________________
If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.
     
     
  #13691  
Old Posted May 19, 2011, 11:31 PM
Obey's Avatar
Obey Obey is offline
BROOKLYN
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimumPx View Post
They didn't (and still don't) care who or what was in the buildings...just that people were in the building.
The Twin Towers were targeted because they symbolized the financial capital of world. So his point is that Conde Nast, who owns magazines, won't be a target. This is topic so lets stop.

I'm guessing not a lot of steel has gone up because of the massive amount of rain here.
     
     
  #13692  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 8:21 AM
Crolo's Avatar
Crolo Crolo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 16
I just love this Building, I just can't wait when it's done!
     
     
  #13693  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 5:02 PM
NYYskyline NYYskyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 58


This is my favorite out of the three. I like how the New York Skyline is coming.
     
     
  #13694  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 10:09 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,576
This thread has gone into a tail-spin. . . let's keep all the side-bar discussions and subsequent debates off this thread. . . if you can't help yourself go start a thread in the buildings section discussion WTC. . . this discussion is specific to the One World Trade Center tower under construction. . . post photos. . . comment on the design. . . but please keep things of an opinionated and editorial fashion out of this thread. . . thanks. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #13695  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 11:03 PM
Totojuice's Avatar
Totojuice Totojuice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 91
Time for checkboxes!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYYskyline View Post


This is my favorite out of the three. I like how the New York Skyline is coming.
Is it just me or is it time for the check box diagram? With those cranes, the structure is definitely the tallest thing in lower manhattan now.....

Can't tell you guys how happy this is making me. Not to be sentimental, but my spirit grows with every foot of this tower. And having caught Osama is going to make the 10 year anniversary really feel like the first time in a decade our city doesn't have a dark cloud hanging over it.

Does anyone on the forum know if the pools willl have built-in beams to permanently recreate the towers of light every year?
     
     
  #13696  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 11:05 PM
JSsocal JSsocal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 717
They don't, but every year they recreate them atop the brooklyn battery tunnel parking garage, and that isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
     
     
  #13697  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 11:22 PM
STR's Avatar
STR STR is offline
Because I'm Clever!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
what.....?
Brilliant satire. Though, since I didn't get it either, I just assume it was so brilliant it flew right over my head.

Anyway, here's some of the leasing plans released the other day. The full set covers the sublevels up through the first floor and up to 6M, plus level 93 & 93M. I skipped 4-6M because I got bored of snapshotting pdf images. Some highlights are the way the connections from ground level to the sub-levels, the old north tower footings visible on B4, the freight entrance on B3, and the way the escape stairs transition from the core to the perimeter on the 2nd floor.









__________________
There are six phases to every project 1) enthusiasm, 2) disillusionment, 3) panic, 4) search for the guilty, 5) punishment of the innocent, 6) praise for the non-participants. - Guy Tozzoli
Build your own Model Skyscrapers** New York City 2015 3D Model W/ New WTC ** World Trade Center (1971-2001) 3D Model
     
     
  #13698  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 3:06 AM
bunky's Avatar
bunky bunky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 91
Pic from 5/11/11. Weather has been lousy since.



http://www.flickr.com/photos/9451351@N03/5741336657/in/photostream
     
     
  #13699  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 3:34 AM
C.Lan C.Lan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 82
It's been raining like crazy, hopefully that hasn't stopped the progress of this too much. Always expected around now, but this Spring had a bit more rain than usual... With the next few weeks, maybe it will be more visible on the skyline. You can always hope!
     
     
  #13700  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 3:38 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.Lan View Post
It's been raining like crazy, hopefully that hasn't stopped the progress of this too much. Always expected around now, but this Spring had a bit more rain than usual... With the next few weeks, maybe it will be more visible on the skyline. You can always hope!
its gonna be a sunny weekend
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.