Quote:
Originally Posted by Troubadour
Which raises the OT-but-still-interesting alternate history question, will the NY skyline ultimately be better or worse because of 9/11? Would Lower Manhattan have become a stagnant museum without the system shock? Would Midtown have become mediocre without the new energy thrust into the identity of New York? In fact, I think I'll start a thread on that.
|
Ugh. This has become horribly disrespectful. Its not about being better or worse. Its not "better" that 3000 people senselessly died. 9-11 scarred thousands of families, a city, and a nation. I highly doubt any victim or their family would consider a redecoration of the skyline as a value for their life or the life of a loved one, let alone 3000 fold.
This thread exists because this city, the US government, and the people of New York think that rebuilding the site is part of a national catharsis, of healing. The business community values replacing lost office space as part of the business of making one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in the world profitable. Lets be thankful that we are rebuilding in a way that dignifies this city and its victims, and not talk about peoples lives as if mass murder was under consideration as a mechanism for improving the skyline.
Click for massive image:

Source:
Maddow Blog, MSNBC
Click for massive image:

Source:
Maddow Blog, MSNBC
Click for massive image:

Source:
Maddow Blog, MSNBC