Quote:
Originally Posted by i-215
Agree re: housing types. As an apartment renter, I can't understand how someone can argue I'm a "higher crime" neighbor than if I lived in a house.
Good to see a mixture of housing types.
|
This was a big issue that came before Planning Commission when I still worked for Payson City. The chair of the commission was a life long resident in his 60's or 70's and was very adamant that apartments were high crime and low income areas, which having seen the apartment selection in Payson I can understand why he would think that.
This particular proposal was for a high end, brick and stucco finished 3 level, multi-building complex with rents around $650+, managed by Pinnacle. The entire commission and council new that I lived in SLC and commuted down to work (yes not green at all). While in Commission meeting we asked what types of individuals they wished to have move into the city, of course young marrieds and young professionals was the answer. To which I replied, "as you all know, I live in SLC and commute down, there are several reason for this; 1, I already own a home in SLC, 2, my social life is in SLC, but 3, and most importantly, there is no place for a young professional like myself to live in Payson City, I refuse to move into the low rent apartments that are available and I am not in the market to buy a second house." One other thing that many government officials and citizens even more so, don't realize is that national retailers need a specific amount of roof tops within a certain distance in order to even considering opening a new location. Apartment buildings provide these rooftops and provide additional disposable income that many paying a mortgage may not have.
There are so many mis-conceptions regarding rental units, particularly apartments, in the cities that are nearly exclusively single family homes or town homes.