HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2941  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2011, 3:14 AM
ablefire ablefire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 52
Thank you sacrifice333.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2942  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2011, 12:29 AM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
looks like $40-50 million bones eaten by the city. pretty tough. blame sullivan/rogers for the bad diligence, the millenium bros for over-ambition (and over-leveraging), the slide in wealth among potential speculators/investors, and maybe robertson/ballem for taking it on instead of just letting it sink (which in retrospect, could well have been the best course of action). intuitively, i'm guessing that this will be something dealt with in 2012.

...
The Olympic village will have a shortfall of between $40-50 million after all the units are sold and the construction loan paid off, Vancouver officials estimated Friday.

That shortfall is the first concrete confirmation that the city is unlikely to recover all of the $578 million it is still owed by the former owner, Millennium Developments.

http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Van...pic+Village+shortfall/4584930/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2943  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2011, 12:53 AM
ablefire ablefire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 52
If a $40-50 million loss on $578M is the full extent of it, and I very much doubt that it is, then it's a huge success. A 10% haircut on a white elephant balanced on a bridge of errors undermined by the global credit crunch would be a miracle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2944  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2011, 1:05 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Why blame Rogers/Sullivan, and not Senator Campbell? Think it's easy to estimate that current councils push to LEED platinum at the last minute and the bad press they branded about, cost the city more then a few dollarsas well, as does having hundreds of the rental units empty months for months after the fact.
This is a sad situation that could've been almost completely avoided were it not for politics.

Last edited by jlousa; Apr 9, 2011 at 4:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2945  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2011, 2:26 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,826
I hope Larry Campbell's unit is one of the leakers - poetic justice!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2946  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2011, 6:11 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
blame campbell too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2947  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2011, 12:57 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
and blame penny ballem, according to gary mason:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nati...e-230-million-and-rising/article1981177/

as usual, francis bula has a more rigorous take. http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized...ium-assets-taken-over-and-receiver-fees/ seriously, why does the globe even have mason on staff?

Last edited by flight_from_kamakura; Apr 12, 2011 at 1:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2948  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2011, 3:07 PM
johnjimbc johnjimbc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 766
Second what jlousa said. The negative politics on this, to which Gregor and company eagerly contributed, really destroyed the perception of the village at a critical time. And I say that as someone who doesn't dislike Gregor as many do.

I think there is plenty of blame to go around, but I would not hold them blameless.

Also, as unpopular as this opinion may be to some, the $40 - $50M loss, if that ends up being the figure, represents an amazingly good investment value. In one large project, Vancouver transformed the entire Southeast False creek area. And in doing so, the city has created a new tax base that will yield benefits to the city ongoing.

Just the infrastructure alone (roads, utilities, parks) would have been necessary to develop that area. Investments that might have taken decades to come to fruition, even in a booming city such as Vancouver, were accomplished in just a few short years. By injecting the boost now, it has already spurred major investment in the surrounding plots of land. That's pretty remarkable given the global slowdown of the past several years.

Cities thrive and grow because of these types of major investments.

It makes for good political fodder now, but thirty years from now all anyone will know is that during this time the false creek area emerged as the thriving center of a major metropolis.

That's how I see it, anyhow. I've seen cities spend far more for less tangible benefit. The OV seems like a wise investment by comparison.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2949  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2011, 4:38 PM
quobobo quobobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjimbc View Post
Also, as unpopular as this opinion may be to some, the $40 - $50M loss, if that ends up being the figure, represents an amazingly good investment value.
I really can't agree with that. There's no shortage of developers who could have stepped in and built similar condos in the area, without costing the public purse anything.

It's not a good investment if someone else would have gladly footed the bill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2950  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2011, 5:05 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Edit, it's much worse than I originally thought. Turns out many of Millennium's pledged assets were levered to the hilt and some are underwater now. Probably should have done some due diligence. The city really fucked this one, in so many ways.
__________________
Flickr

Last edited by wrenegade; Apr 12, 2011 at 6:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2951  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2011, 7:36 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
An excavator and pneumatic shoring drill are on site at Wall Centre False Creek's western parcel of land. That's a very good sign that construction is imminent.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2952  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2011, 8:22 PM
golog golog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
Edit, it's much worse than I originally thought. Turns out many of Millennium's pledged assets were levered to the hilt and some are underwater now. Probably should have done some due diligence. The city really fucked this one, in so many ways.
so do you think city council should hold on to them and hope for prices to go up enough that it covers the mortgage costs in the end?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2953  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2011, 10:26 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
An excavator and pneumatic shoring drill are on site at Wall Centre False Creek's western parcel of land. That's a very good sign that construction is imminent.
awesome news! thanks for the post ... wheres the pic?
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2954  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2011, 11:18 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodnorth View Post
awesome news! thanks for the post ... wheres the pic?
I didn't have my camera with me, just my three year old Blackberry with its magestic .4 megapixel lint encrusted camera. Plus I was on my bike and it had started to rain so I wasn't too keen to stop. Hopefully they aren't going anywhere so a photo with a proper camera in a few days' time should suffice.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2955  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2011, 6:48 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by golog View Post
so do you think city council should hold on to them and hope for prices to go up enough that it covers the mortgage costs in the end?
The Evelyn project in West Van is valued somewhere around $75M but is mortgaged for $116M. There is no way the market is going to recover that much.

There are lots of things I think the city should do with the Olympic Village. I'd start with getting rid of all of the social housing. There is no way they can break even though. No matter what happens the PEF is going to be out a huge chunk of money.
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2956  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2011, 4:14 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Birds Eye View of WCFC. Can't guarantee how long i can provide these for... but at least until December!


Untitled by sacrifice333, on Flickr

Matcon's busy prepping the site. There's a medium-sized excavator on the Eastern side of the property today as well.
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2957  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2011, 1:35 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
Fantastic. Thank you for the view. Eight months of phots from that vantage point of yours will be very welcome indeed.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2958  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2011, 7:00 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,826
Loved Mayor Moonbeam on Global trying to convince us the city didn't really lose that money they were supposed to get for the land, since they didn't actually get paid.

It's nice to see living proof that beautiful people can be dumb as a stick.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2959  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2011, 5:52 PM
Porfiry Porfiry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Loved Mayor Moonbeam on Global trying to convince us the city didn't really lose that money they were supposed to get for the land, since they didn't actually get paid.

It's nice to see living proof that beautiful people can be dumb as a stick.
As usual, you resort to superficial personal attacks without backing up your own position. So weak.

The asset was sold, payment fell through, and the asset was reclaimed. No cash was lost in that aspect of the transaction. You might argue that there's an opportunity loss, in that we could have retained the land for some other more lucrative purpose, but that's not quantifiable and is not a cash loss.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2960  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2011, 6:34 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porfiry View Post
As usual, you resort to superficial personal attacks without backing up your own position. So weak.

The asset was sold, payment fell through, and the asset was reclaimed. No cash was lost in that aspect of the transaction. You might argue that there's an opportunity loss, in that we could have retained the land for some other more lucrative purpose, but that's not quantifiable and is not a cash loss.
HA. Here's a personal attack you can take to the bank: you sound like a bloody accountant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:39 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.