HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2101  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2011, 6:14 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Another note, it appears that they are getting ready to hoist into place the first of many girders for the #7 westbound to #1 eastbound fly-over at the Cape Horn interchange.

Saw it just an hour ago driving home.
Yah, they are diverting Hwy 7 EB onto the WB lanes March 25-27 and April 1-3 for this work.

http://www.pmh1project.com/construction-...WeekendTrafficChangesLougheedHighway.pdf
     
     
  #2102  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2011, 7:41 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Webcam pic from today:

Weird how the perspective makes the 4 cables in the middle look like 2 cables (i.e. in the pic, east side has 6 cables, west side has 5 cables)


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The other cables are also [temporarily] being held by wires.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
     
     
  #2103  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 10:02 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Webcam pic from today - inner cables are up:


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
     
     
  #2104  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 10:54 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
Apparently the 3 lane section of Rte 1 just east of Port Mann Bridge, is now going to end west of the 152nd onramp (how it works is that the rightmost lane becomes exit only rather than being an optional exit lane and then ending 500m to the east)
Sudden-merging to the left out of an exit only lane on an uphill slope with likely only around 400m of signage before it actually happens... oh boy, I have a bad feeling about this

I forsee this becoming a problem as well. Not much room for a left turn lane there, it's probably going to be short.. there's still only one lane across that overpass... which means any traffic heading into the Fraser Heights vicinity or for Barnston Drive east could end up being blocked northbound if it gets busy enough. I think this is a really unwise idea, as this is one of the biggest movements present at this interchange and plenty of trucks use it too. For the very least it's only going to be like this for some 6 months. To me the closure of 100th @ Hwy 15 was probably the biggest loss... that was one of my favourite shortcut routes during Hwy 1 WB peak hours. At the very least 96th is open again.
     
     
  #2105  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 11:21 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
So that's for the eastbound collector/local lane?

May not be much of a problem, given that it's a collector/local lane.

EDIT - for construction - yeah, could get congested.
     
     
  #2106  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 11:56 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
It's going from this:

Code:
| | |
|   |
| | i\      / / /
|   i \    /   /
| | i<|   / / /
|   i |  /   /
| | i | / / /
|   i<|/   /
| | | i / /
|     i/ /
| | | i /
|     i>|
| | | i | _
|     i |  |
| | | i>|  |
|     i |  |
| | | i |  |
|     i>|  |<<<This part is uphill
| | | i /  |
|     i/|  |
| | | | | _|

To this:

| | |  / / /
|   | /   /
| | |/ / /
|   i   /
| | i | | _
|   i   |  |
|^|^i>|>|  |
|   i   |  |
| | i | |  |
|   i   |  |<<<UPHILL
|^|^i>|>|  |
|   i  /   |
| | i /   _|
So it becomes merge left or exit.

The biggest problems are that the merge is going to be happening with very short notice (first sign appears at 700M.... the second exit lane takes another 300M to appear so this may end up a problem for Surrey-bound travellers) and it's going to be happening during an uphill slope - as well, a lot of trucks using the outer lanes are going to have to merge there now.
     
     
  #2107  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 12:26 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
But it's just for construction, so you have to expect slower traffic etc. (even if it is for a year).

I guess the shift is to create a workzone down the middle of the right-of-way?
     
     
  #2108  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 1:55 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
Actually I'm also fairly concerned about the safety here. I've been told that the westbound setup has already caused a lot of accidents... I'm predicting no less than the same with eastbound now with the kind of merging/movement that now has to happen over such a short distance and going uphill. You can eventually fix traffic, you can eventually fix damaged cars, but take it too far and you'll end up with problems you can't ever fix...
     
     
  #2109  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 5:22 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,203
Well it may be less safe than previous, but I doubt its worse than the Boundary on ramp, southbound Dollarton on ramp or westbound Capilano Rd. on ramp.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #2110  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 7:29 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
it can;t ba any worse than the changes to the grandview exit - i still see people suddenly realize they shouldn't be exiting and slow down and or try to merge Left ASAP
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #2111  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 7:58 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
The Grandview exit one is actually fairly well signed (1200M I believe). It also does not go uphill and I don't think it serves nearly as much trucks either. Highway 1 westbound may be taking in traffic to the Port of vancouver, but highway 1 eastbound there is taking in traffic from Deltaport, (via existing "NFPR"), Richmond, and Vancouver to the rest of Canada and perhaps even the US via Rte 15.
     
     
  #2112  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2011, 2:02 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Another recent shot showing the height of the new towers transposed against the original:

[

Source: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5297/5554445982_32f3df7eee_z.jpg
     
     
  #2113  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2011, 6:22 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Looks like the north tower is practically topped out as well.
I guess the difference in location for the footings on the south side are whether they are north or south of the railway tracks.
     
     
  #2114  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2011, 6:30 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047

That picture, that contrast ... Wheeeeeeew ...
     
     
  #2115  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2011, 8:18 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
Anne Murray: Is the Gateway Program the only vision for B.C.’s Lower Mainland?

By Anne Murray, March 29, 2011



“Gateway” is a word that has been working overtime. Synonymous with B.C.’s and Canada’s trade with Asia, it represents an ambitious vision for the movement and storage of goods and people, by land, sea, and air, promoted by a powerful coalition of transportation agencies. The Greater Vancouver Gateway Council has convinced federal and provincial governments to approve, fund, and fast-track multibillion-dollar highways and extensive rail and port developments. These massive investments are changing the landscape around the Lower Mainland forever.

Overlooked in the rush to move more trucks and container ships is a more balanced vision that values the attributes which make living in the Lower Mainland so attractive. That vision embraces all aspects of the natural and physical environment, including rural landscapes, air and water quality, and the birds and other wildlife that inhabit the Fraser estuary. It also values activities that depend on a healthy environment, such as farming, fishing, and outdoor recreation. It is the type of thinking that produced the Agricultural Land Reserve in 1973, the regional district’s Green Zone in 1992, and the Lower Mainland Nature Legacy Program in 1995. Many citizens support such a vision, but strong political leadership is currently lacking.

With a dearth of considered alternatives, the Gateway Program surges ahead. Its plan for the next two decades will see one million more cars on the road, a whole new port facility at Roberts Bank, more than a million additional container truck trips, and industrial land built out to the maximum. Gateway includes the $2-billion South Fraser Perimeter Road, a truck highway plowing through acres of farmland and rolling over habitat in Burns Bog, home to sandhill cranes, southern red-backed voles, and Pacific water shrews. A 1993 version of the Gateway plan, known as Transport 2021, admitted that the identified transportation corridors contradicted the goals of the region’s Livable Region Strategic Plan (set to be replaced by the Regional Growth Strategy).

The Gateway Program is a destabilizing influence on the ALR, already under siege from decades of development proposals. In 1968 and 1969, 4,000 acres of prime Delta farmland were expropriated for back-up lands for the Roberts Bank superport. Following the pro-ALR sentiments of the 1990s, these lands were offered for sale back to the original farming families. Now these same lands are being repurchased through a series of curious deals, particularly those along the B.C. Rail spur line to Deltaport, where rail yards and container storage are planned. Land speculators and agencies are driving up the price ahead of the bulldozers. For example, a 46-acre property beside the B.C. Rail line, sold by the Crown in 2002 for $575,000, was resold in 2008 for $3.5 million. Some of this property is now owned by B.C. Rail, purchased at a premium price. The assessed value of another piece of land, close to the route of the SFPR, jumped suddenly from $628,000 in 2002 to $4.3 million in 2004; by 2009, it was valued at $8.4 million. The Gateway plan calls for all “vacant” lands south of the Fraser to be made available for industrial use. Agriculture becomes even more challenging under these conditions, with the cost of land prohibitive for new farmers.

...

http://www.straight.com/article-383894/v...y-program-only-vision-bcs-lower-mainland
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #2116  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2011, 10:18 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
I can't tell if they've paved the new lanes or if it's ready for paving. Looks like the latter...

http://archives.earthcam.com/archives5/ecnetwork/ca/bc/burnaby/2011/03/30/1500.jpg
     
     
  #2117  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2011, 10:29 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
was not paved monday when I went past
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #2118  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2011, 10:37 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Looks like they've also ripped up the pavement at the old Grandview exit lane - presumably to shift all of the lanes to the north to create a bit more room for the HOV ramps to touch down.
     
     
  #2119  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2011, 12:35 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
...rolling over habitat in Burns Bog, home to sandhill cranes, southern red-backed voles, and Pacific water shrews.
Think of the voles and water schrews! Won't somebody please think of the voles and water schrews?!

Sorry, that article made me laugh out loud. I like how her map labeled the Hwy 1 expansion and SFPR as "proposed" and how the ALR completely covered all of the Tsawwassen Native Band's lands (which will definitely NOT be agricultural). Industrial land values skyrocketed when a brand new truck route was announced, well, duh! Not to mention all land pretty much skyrocketed in the period 2000-2008 everywhere in Vancouver, regardless of use. I really don't see how this article is important at all. Half of what she mentioned is already in the past or a foregone conclusion, what does she expect to happen? Also, expansion of the port at Roberts Bank makes a hell of a lot more sense (and is much better for the environment) than routing more train and truck traffic through the city to Burrard Inlet.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though, it is the Straight.
__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #2120  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2011, 2:24 AM
madmigs's Avatar
madmigs madmigs is offline
Crazy as a mad hatter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
Think of the voles and water schrews! Won't somebody please think of the voles and water schrews?!

Sorry, that article made me laugh out loud. I like how her map labeled the Hwy 1 expansion and SFPR as "proposed" and how the ALR completely covered all of the Tsawwassen Native Band's lands (which will definitely NOT be agricultural). Industrial land values skyrocketed when a brand new truck route was announced, well, duh! Not to mention all land pretty much skyrocketed in the period 2000-2008 everywhere in Vancouver, regardless of use. I really don't see how this article is important at all. Half of what she mentioned is already in the past or a foregone conclusion, what does she expect to happen? Also, expansion of the port at Roberts Bank makes a hell of a lot more sense (and is much better for the environment) than routing more train and truck traffic through the city to Burrard Inlet.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though, it is the Straight.
While it looks like an old infographic, it looks remarkably similar to the official ALR map: http://www.alc.gov.bc.ca/mapping/alr_maps/Metro_Vancouver/Index_Map_Metro_Vancouver.pdf
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.