HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1201  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 12:12 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,084
Foster looked around, saw the essence of Vancouver's built fabric, from the brutalist exposed concrete of the 70's and 80's west end to the current all too pervasive glass and metal trend, and melded them together in an expressive but subtle way, using more European sensibility than we Canadians can appreciate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1202  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 4:37 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,131
did he even design it? he sold his firm a while back - basically sold his name to the firm that bought him out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1203  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 4:46 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
The concrete wasn't intended... it was originally going to be metal-clad, but they had to cut costs and lower the price range. — to have bought early.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1204  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 9:45 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
Foster looked around, saw the essence of Vancouver's built fabric, from the brutalist exposed concrete of the 70's and 80's west end to the current all too pervasive glass and metal trend, and melded them together in an expressive but subtle way, using more European sensibility than we Canadians can appreciate.

That's sort of what I think, too, although this post post will generate its percentage of boo's and hisses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1205  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 5:34 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
The concrete wasn't intended... it was originally going to be metal-clad, but they had to cut costs and lower the price range. — to have bought early.
I dont think most buyers care what the exterior of a building looks like... how else could you explain the high sales levels in half the buildings in yaletown
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1206  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 10:46 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
The concrete wasn't intended... it was originally going to be metal-clad, but they had to cut costs and lower the price range. — to have bought early.

Metal clad? That might have been even worse. It sounds bizarre at any rate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1207  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 11:21 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
I dont think most buyers care what the exterior of a building looks like... how else could you explain the high sales levels in half the buildings in yaletown
A truly profound statement on Vancouver real estate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1208  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2011, 12:19 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post

Metal clad? That might have been even worse. It sounds bizarre at any rate.
I'm assuming he meant Alucabond or a similar product, its a common, if somewhat expensive, clading material. I could see a white or similar light colour looking pretty sharp on the exposed concrete, but then again I dont have much of an issue with the exposed concrete as is.

It doesnt look great in the recent pics, but if you look back to some of the earlier pics taken on sunny blue sky days it isnt really that bad. IMO of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1209  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2011, 5:25 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
A little bit of Jameson peaking out behind the other buildings, from my room at the Fairmont Pacific Rim.


Vancouver by s.yume, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1210  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 3:08 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,760
Holy wasted rooftop patio, Batman.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1211  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2011, 3:50 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,034
I know, but it looked great n Fantastic Four during the wedding scene!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1212  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2011, 10:08 AM
Sprawl Sprawl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I know, but it looked great n Fantastic Four during the wedding scene!
Or did it?

source

The magic of cinema...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1213  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2011, 6:29 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,731
Photo update | March 24th, 2011

(Copied and pasted from the downtown updates thread)

Jameson House from Granville Square. This may well be my favourite perspective on the project. The flat east-facing secondary elevation of the tower is a phenomenal precedent for an alternative architectural expression for high-rise residential buildings which would entirely capable of serving as a building's primary architectural expression. Just compare it to the Terminal City Club tower on the right side, which is very typical example of a secondary elevation of painted concrete and window wall.

Taken by SFUVancouver, March 24th, 2011.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1214  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2011, 1:15 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
I love that side of Jameson House and I really hope more DT residential buildings take design cues from it. The glass looks amazing and the balconies look great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1215  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2011, 5:36 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by galeforcewinds View Post
I love that side of Jameson House and I really hope more DT residential buildings take design cues from it. The glass looks amazing and the balconies look great.

Excuse me. Just to check, are you talking about the east (flat) side of the building, as in the photo above? Or the west "stylish front face" side? Thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1216  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2011, 11:08 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post

Excuse me. Just to check, are you talking about the east (flat) side of the building, as in the photo above? Or the west "stylish front face" side? Thank you.
I like both the curved and flat sides. We're not going to see many curved side style buildings, but I really wouldn't mind more buildings inspired by the flat side. As I said, at the very least The glass looks great and I like the inset balconies as opposed to the usual protruding balconies we see in Vancouver.


The only view I don't like, as with many people, is the three quarter view of thr curved side with all that exposed concrete. I don't mind concrete but I think they should have added one more panel of glass, even if it was just spandrel (as long as it looked the same) to the curved sections to make the concrete part of the curves not so overbearing. Also it wouldn't look so bunker like if it were 10 stories taller, which IMO would give the whole building a sleeker appearance.

Overall I'd give it a 7/10, 8.5/10 considering it's in Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1217  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2011, 2:23 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by galeforcewinds View Post
I like both the curved and flat sides. We're not going to see many curved side style buildings, but I really wouldn't mind more buildings inspired by the flat side. As I said, at the very least The glass looks great and I like the inset balconies as opposed to the usual protruding balconies we see in Vancouver.


The only view I don't like, as with many people, is the three quarter view of thr curved side with all that exposed concrete. I don't mind concrete but I think they should have added one more panel of glass, even if it was just spandrel (as long as it looked the same) to the curved sections to make the concrete part of the curves not so overbearing. Also it wouldn't look so bunker like if it were 10 stories taller, which IMO would give the whole building a sleeker appearance.

Overall I'd give it a 7/10, 8.5/10 considering it's in Vancouver.
Good points.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1218  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2011, 11:08 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by galeforcewinds View Post
I like both the curved and flat sides. We're not going to see many curved side style buildings, but I really wouldn't mind more buildings inspired by the flat side. As I said, at the very least The glass looks great and I like the inset balconies as opposed to the usual protruding balconies we see in Vancouver.


The only view I don't like, as with many people, is the three quarter view of thr curved side with all that exposed concrete. I don't mind concrete but I think they should have added one more panel of glass, even if it was just spandrel (as long as it looked the same) to the curved sections to make the concrete part of the curves not so overbearing. Also it wouldn't look so bunker like if it were 10 stories taller, which IMO would give the whole building a sleeker appearance.

Overall I'd give it a 7/10, 8.5/10 considering it's in Vancouver.
Agreed ! ! Your assessment of it and mine seem to chime. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1219  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2011, 7:05 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
They've removed the hoarding and should be ready to pour the sidewalk sometime next week or so. Was able to walk up and look inside, looks like there is still quite a bit of work to do in the lobby and a few of the lower glass panels are caked in cement, think they might require replacement. Being able to walk along it though it really makes the project shine, they did a great job at the street level where it really matters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1220  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2011, 3:26 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
Great, thanks for the update.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.