HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2861  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2011, 7:59 AM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I don't mind having a few buildigs much taller than those around it - it adds variety.
I think that CityGate in uniformly placing all of its tall towers on the water side of the complexes messes up the look of the area more than an oddball tall tower will.
I couldn't agree more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2862  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2011, 7:52 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,731
A good example of a tower standing among shorter medium rise buildings is the Portico development on Granville Street between 5th, Hemlock and 7th. The tower is about twice the height of anything around it but it works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2863  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 3:55 PM
SEFC's Avatar
SEFC SEFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12
Interesting Photo Album

Mostly shots of the NEU. Plus some captures of PDFs from the city website.

http://s1134.photobucket.com/albums/m604/Hammard2011/SEFC/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2864  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 12:31 AM
ablefire ablefire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 52
Very nice. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2865  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2011, 6:28 AM
madmigs's Avatar
madmigs madmigs is offline
Crazy as a mad hatter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 298
Millennium Properties has crashed and burned again on another property...

Quote:
The high-end West Vancouver development linked to the troubled Olympic Village has gone into receivership.
Millennium Properties' Evelyn Drive project had seen a number of delays, before they eventually defaulted on the mortgage.
Vancouver-based Bowra Group has been appointed as receiver, with their mission to sell the property.

West Vancouver Mayor Pamela Goldsmith-Jones says the project is an important one to her community, "Council and the community have worked very hard for seven years to provide this new neighbourhood opportunity and we wish for it to come to fruition, and see it built. We're now hopeful that that's going to happen, and I think it's good that this is public now so that we can continue."
Millennium had already pre-sold 31 of the 109 units.
This news follows last year's appointment of a receiver for their Olympic Village site.
http://www.cknw.com/Channels/Reg/NewsLocal/Story.aspx?ID=1385778
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2866  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 5:54 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,142
Class action suit launched by several OV buyers, alleging amongst other things, shoddy workmanship:

...In some cases, doors will slam into each other if they're opened at the same time. In others, residents aren't able to open their closet doors if anything larger than a double bed is placed in the master bedroom.

"Not being able to fit a queen-sized bed in a master bedroom is a major design flaw," McMillan said.

Other residents have had problems with persistent leaky ceilings and faulty heating. A video released by the owners shows water dripping from light fixtures and smoke alarms.

"One guy's had his entire ceiling ripped out because they can't figure out why his heating system doesn't work," McMillan said....

http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local..._110316/20110316?hub=BritishColumbiaHome
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2867  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:56 AM
madmigs's Avatar
madmigs madmigs is offline
Crazy as a mad hatter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Class action suit launched by several OV buyers, alleging amongst other things, shoddy workmanship:

...In some cases, doors will slam into each other if they're opened at the same time. In others, residents aren't able to open their closet doors if anything larger than a double bed is placed in the master bedroom.

"Not being able to fit a queen-sized bed in a master bedroom is a major design flaw," McMillan said.

Other residents have had problems with persistent leaky ceilings and faulty heating. A video released by the owners shows water dripping from light fixtures and smoke alarms.

"One guy's had his entire ceiling ripped out because they can't figure out why his heating system doesn't work," McMillan said....

http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local..._110316/20110316?hub=BritishColumbiaHome
It's sounding more and more like the design and workmanship in the OV really isn't anywhere need the level it should be, even for the regular stuff that every condo has. Which leads me to think that all the equipment and things to improve efficiency, etc were also installed with the same lack of quality workmanship. And that is really unfortunate, as its giving really bad impressions about where we are at with current technology and that its just not worth it to try and be more "green". It's essentially giving the perfect scenario to those that try to say that in order to be green, we have to sacrifice our quality of life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2868  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 5:22 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Who was the GC on the project ? This suit & issues with the buildings made the news here in Edmonton this morning

I wonder if it's something relatedto timelines or the bidding process for these types of buildings. Calgary's Olympic village is practically a tear down at this point as they were built extremely poorly then not kept up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2869  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:14 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Looks bad:

• Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2870  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:18 PM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
Shocking stuff. Do these people bother to hire a building inspector, or even look at the place before they buy??? I'm sure the timelines had at least a part to play in this matter.

"...In some cases, doors will slam into each other if they're opened at the same time. In others, residents aren't able to open their closet doors if anything larger than a double bed is placed in the master bedroom."
<<< This to me sounds like an architectural f-up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2871  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:27 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
A lot of times inspectors don't catch the issues that crop up until all the equipment is operating. Sounds like some architectural screwups, lots of low bid awards to inferior contractors coupled with accelerated timelines, cashflow problems and probably some municipal gerrymandering.

In this case, as with most, the "two of three" principle probably applies

Cheap
Fast
Good

I'm guessing they went with cheap & fast

Last edited by 240glt; Mar 18, 2011 at 6:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2872  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:42 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
I'm not terribly surprised with the bedroom size issues or the doors banging into each other. Anyone that took the time to look when walking through the suites should have been able to notice this. Definitely a little more difficult when buying off of a piece of paper but if you are investing this much money into something you would think you would take a better look at which way the doors are opening and get measurements for the room sizes. I sure as hell did when I bought a pre-sale unit.

They were tricky though when walking through the suites that many of the bathroom and closet doors were taken off of their hinges to make the units feel more open. I never did see a queen size bed in any of the units apart from those in Canada House though, the bedrooms are tiny.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2873  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 6:46 PM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
Obviously there are both design and construction issues.... Shoddy construction is sadly nothing new, but I'm really shocked at the design issues, and whoever was the architect needs to be held accountable.

But surely most prospective buyers would notice the design flaws before they buy??? I suppose the fit of a bed might be hard to visualize, but as for the rest of the flaws... three doors swinging into each other, windows opening against concrete, poor door sills or crooked glass would be obvious on any walkthrough. These things are impossible to hide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2874  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 7:39 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,814
Alot of those things (small rooms, doors conflicting) are typical foo downtown condos.

The leaks in the ceiling are not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2875  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 8:33 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,131
haha maybe they should just give the housing away to the homeless protestors haha

the units i saw in person of course were perfect but there are a lot of issues you can see from just the outside walking around
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2876  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 8:54 PM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,978
Yeah, I don't understand how people didn't notice the obvious flaws on the plans - e.g., a bedroom not big enough to fit a queen-sized bed.

Out of interest, for those that bought after the building was complete, did the salespeople allow prospective buyers to tour the specific suite they were interested in? Not just a showroom, but the exact suite that you're buying?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2877  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 9:57 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
There are a few issues there that are obviously not acceptable.

But there's a lot of stuff pointed out in the video that is simply due to a natural settling that occurs in buildings as they age, especially in their initial life.

Note regarding cracks, minor deficiencies, etc. I am a tenant at "The Village" obviously not the highest-priority resident of development yet I have had people in to fix deficiencies, of which there were some, within days and generally accommodating my schedule. Granted, while Millennium still owned the village I understand there were a lot more issues with have deficiencies dealt with promptly. With E&Y/COV this has not been the case, in my experience.

Re some of the leaks shown. I suspect that those are largely capillary mat issues (the heating/cooling system) and were probably inadvertently punctured, possible by the owners!

As for doors opening into each other and so forth. Some of what was on the video obviously need to be fixed. But others are just a matter of size and having the best of both worlds... unless you want endless wasted hallway space you may have multiple doors that can not be opened at the same time. Get over it.

As for the bedroom size, again, it's a bit of a catch 22. Firstly, welcome to condo living, where you DON'T have much bedroom furniture other than your BED and maybe some NIGHT TABLES. Second, if in some of these suites, especially the smaller ones you were given a larger bedroom, such as one with a king bed and room for a "5 piece bedroom set" you wouldn't have room for more than a single chair in your living area. Living space is in my opinion more important than bedroom space and if the tables were turned you'd agree!

5 percent of one circular column being cut off at the base. Oh not, call the seismic police, the buildings coming down!



I repeat, there's a few issues there that are obviously not acceptable, but the vast majority of that stuff is a) just condo living and b) what you would get with the majority of developers in this day and age.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2878  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 9:58 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
I don't know. A lot of people will overlook the details when wealking through a new place, and something lie a door installed not in the proper orientatino could be over looked. That's not that big a deal..... I'd be more concerned about the obvious plumbing, heating, drainage and possible structural deficiencies as well as the shoddy finishing work (that once again may not be obviosu until a suite is occupied)

Either way it sounds like a fiasco, as it was from the get go, and the city is going to be on the hook. The high cost of holding an Olympic games I suppose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2879  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 10:09 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,131
in the past olympic games - didn't the athlete villages usually become student housing? i think its only a recent thing where they make the athlete villages become market housing in an attempt to recoup costs isn't it?

as for size and doors - i have visited plenty of condos downtown that are so small i just can't imagine living in one - i was at one place and the bedroom fit a bed and nothing else at all no dresser no nothing - the closet was barely accessible because they had a huge bed - you definately have to downsize or pay a lot more for liveable space
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2880  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2011, 10:41 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,057
British Columbia has long been known as a "make a quick buck" place. I recall living in a new apartment building, and my front door opening was sloped, so that there was a thin triangular space that peaked over the opening side of the door and let in noise.

Just quick, shoddy, do-the-minimum-and-go-for-a-beer workmanship.

We had the leaky condo issue several decades back, and they (the leaky condos) were everywhere.

It's largely lack of pride, and selfish laziness (or vice versa) that's the underlying factor. A mentality that lacks a sense of civility, and crassly thinks only of its own interests is largely at the root of much of this ... sadly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.